SDG points tracker
Internal, for SDG PICs and units. Estimated points from the current narrations, THE Sustainability Impact Ratings 2027. Each SDG is scored out of 100; the bar shows how those points split. Pick a goal for its indicators, or switch to units for what each one still has to supply.
Secured (estimate)Still to gainDrafted, not estimatedSDG reports (17.3.x)Quantitative dataResearch, computed by THE
Pick a goal. The white line on each icon shows the share of its evidence points secured.
Pick a goal above to see its indicators.
SDG 1 · No PovertyEvidence indicators: ~33.1 of 46 points secured · quantitative 27 · THE-computed research 275 full points2 can be strengthened2 evidence missing1.1 Research on poverty 27 points · computed by THE from publications
1.2 Proportion of students receiving financial aid to attend university because of poverty 27 points
1.2.1Low income students receiving financial aidworth 27 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
1.3 University anti-poverty programmes 23 points
1.3.1Bottom financial quintile admission target3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the targets in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's decree or admissions rule reserving a stated share of new places (for example a percentage of intake) for applicants from the poorest household-income group, dated 2025 or 2026. 2. A public admissions page for a KIP-Kuliah or affirmative route stating the household-income ceiling and the target number of low-income students admitted in 2025 or 2026. 3. A pipeline programme for poor senior-high-school students, run by a named unit, with a target number of places and the 2025 or 2026 intake date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public admissions or news page stating the target or quota for poorest-household students, its size, the income threshold used, who set it and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a target to admit bottom-quintile (or more tightly defined) students | Done | In the narration, section 1.3.1.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 2 Tahun…, 2024-01-19) |
| Evidence of the target being applied (an admissions quota, a scheme's eligibility rule, a pipeline programme) | Done | In the narration, section 1.3.1.2, 5 sources (first: UKT Sarjana (tuition groups K0-K8, K0 for KIP-Kuliah recipients), 2026) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- UNESA's own written statement, such as a Rector's Regulation or an admissions committee decree, that it adopts the national 20 percent UKT Kelompok I/II and KIP-Kuliah floor as its own institutional admission target, rather than only the national regulation binding all PTNs. Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- UNESA's full count of new students placed in UKT Kelompok I and Kelompok II for 2025 and 2026, alongside the KIP-Kuliah (K0) counts already found, and the total new-student intake for SNBT 2025. Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
1.3.2Bottom financial quintile student success0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the targets in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's decree setting a minimum on-time graduation or completion rate for KIP-Kuliah and other low-income students, naming the owning unit, dated 2025 or 2026. 2. A faculty target to keep dropout of scholarship-holding students under a stated ceiling, reviewed each semester, with the 2025 or 2026 monitoring report. 3. A mentoring or at-risk alert scheme tracking low-income students' progress against a set graduation target, with dates and number of students followed. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the graduation or completion target for low-income students (the rate, the unit owning it, how progress is tracked) with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a graduation/completion target for bottom-quintile students | Needs data | Request 1 below: A stated completion, graduation or dropout-ceiling target specifically for KIP-Kuliah or other bottom-quintile/low… |
| Evidence of monitoring or intervention against that target (progress tracking, mentoring, at-risk alerts) | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether any unit (Direktorat Kemahasiswaan, the KIP-K student forum Formadiksi, or a faculty) tracks and reports… |
What is still needed
- A stated completion, graduation or dropout-ceiling target specifically for KIP-Kuliah or other bottom-quintile/low income students (for example a minimum GPA or maximum time-to-degree condition attached to keeping a KIP-K scholarship, or a target retention/completion rate the university sets for this group), dated 2025 or 2026. Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- Whether any unit (Direktorat Kemahasiswaan, the KIP-K student forum Formadiksi, or a faculty) tracks and reports completion or dropout outcomes specifically for KIP-K or low income students, with 2025/2026 figures. Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
1.3.3Low-income student support2.25 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0.25 | Maximum one point for free support, only 0.25 points for subsidised support. To raise it, see the Needs data criteria below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free support: a campus food bank or free meal scheme for low-income students, stating eligibility, the running unit, 2025 or 2026 dates and how many students were helped. 2. Free support: a free dormitory place, shuttle or legal aid desk for KIP-Kuliah or low-income students, with eligibility rules and 2025 or 2026 numbers served. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing free support (food, housing, transport or legal help) for low-income students, who qualifies, who runs it, the 2025 or 2026 date and how many were helped. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free support (food, housing, transportation, legal services, or a support centre) for low-income students | Needs data | Request 1 below: Free basic needs support for low income students (food, housing, transportation or legal services, or a dedicated… |
| Subsidised support for low-income students | Done | In the narration, section 1.3.3.1, 2 sources (first: Pengajuan Keringanan UKT Mahasiswa Lama UNESA Semester Gasal 2025/2026, 2025-06-17) |
What is still needed
- Free basic needs support for low income students (food, housing, transportation or legal services, or a dedicated support centre) that is either fee waived or eligibility limited to low income students, distinct from the university's general free exam breakfasts and Ramadan iftar which are open to all students and the public. Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- The number of students who used the UKT level reduction or instalment plan in 2025 and 2026. Ask: Direktorat Keuangan (finance)
1.3.4Bottom financial quintile student support3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the programmes or initiatives in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A named programme for low-income students combining tuition support, mentoring and academic coaching through to graduation, with eligibility, the running unit and 2025 or 2026 dates. 2. A tuition-fee reduction or UKT relief scheme aimed at students from the poorest households, with eligibility rules, number of recipients and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. A coordinated KIP-Kuliah recipient support programme (orientation, monthly mentoring, emergency fund) with a coordinator, participants and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing a continuous programme for poorest-household students (what it offers, how they qualify, the unit running it, numbers helped, 2025 or 2026 dates). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Programme or initiative targeted at bottom-quintile students to help them complete their studies (mentoring, coaching, tuition-fee reduction schemes, non-commercial loans) | Done | In the narration, section 1.3.4.1, 2 sources (first: Pengajuan Keringanan UKT Mahasiswa Lama UNESA Semester Gasal 2025/2026, 2025-06-17) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The number of students who received a UKT tariff-group reduction or instalment plan in 2025 and in 2026. Ask: Direktorat Keuangan (finance)
- Whether UNESA also runs a non-financial completion-support activity targeted at KIP-K or low income students specifically, such as mentoring or coaching through the KIP-K student forum (Formadiksi KIP-K), dated 2025 or 2026. Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
1.3.5Low or lower-middle income countries student support3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the schemes in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A scholarship offering free tuition and a living allowance to students from named low or lower-middle income countries, with 2025 or 2026 recipient numbers and countries. 2. A university international-student grant or tuition waiver for applicants from developing countries, listing eligible nationalities and the 2025 or 2026 intake. 3. A government-partner scholarship (for example for ASEAN or African students) hosted at the university, with the scheme rules and recipients' countries named. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the scholarship, the low or lower-middle income countries eligible, what it covers, and recipients from those countries in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Scheme offering free education, grants or scholarships to poor students from low/lower-middle income countries | Done | In the narration, section 1.3.5.1, 3 sources (first: KNB (Kemitraan Negara Berkembang) Scholarship, 2026) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- UNESA's own published list of KNB (and other international scholarship) recipients by nationality for 2025 and 2026, or the total headcount from World Bank low or lower-middle income countries. Ask: International Office (Kantor Urusan Internasional)
1.4 Community anti-poverty programmes 23 points
1.4.1Local start-up assistance3 / 3worth 5.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Maximum one point for free, only 0.25 points for subsidised support Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free assistance: a mentoring programme where lecturers coach local villagers and micro-entrepreneurs on starting a business, with participant numbers and 2025 or 2026 dates. 2. Free assistance: a training workshop for the local community on business planning and digital marketing, stating it is free, who attended and the 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Free assistance: open access to incubator facilities or workshop space for local community start-ups, with the rules and a 2025 or 2026 usage report. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing free start-up help (mentoring, training or facility access), who joined beyond students, how it supports sustainable businesses, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free assistance (mentorship, training workshops, access to facilities) to the local community for starting sustainable businesses | Done | In the narration, section 1.4.1.1, 5 sources (first: Menebar Sayap Kemandirian Protein Perkotaan: Lewat Sinergi Lintas Sektor, FKP…, 2026-06-19) |
| Paid/subsidised assistance for the same | Not needed | The top option is already claimed |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that the Jaran Kepang partnership and the Zero to Hero mentoring with APMMJ charge no fee to the community businesses or SMEs involved, and the number of businesses and individuals assisted in 2025 and 2026 Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Whether the FKP, DKPP and BRIDA agribusiness incubator planned for urban farmer groups and local youth (site visit 28 July 2026) has since opened and assisted an actual business start-up Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- The value of the DPPM Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2026 grant to UKM Telur Asin Krembangan and confirmation the auto egg steamer equipment was delivered Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Any 2025-2026 UNESA-run mentorship or training scheme open to local residents generally, with a standing name, eligibility rule and schedule, rather than one project tied to a single partner NGO or one faculty's placement Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
1.4.2Local start-up financial assistance0 / 3worth 5.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the assistance in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A seed-funding or grant scheme giving cash to local community start-ups, stating the amount, number of recipients and the 2025 or 2026 award date. 2. A community-service grant (for example from the national research ministry) where UNESA passes funds to village micro-business groups, with amounts and dates. 3. A matched-funding or small start-up capital programme for local entrepreneurs run by the university incubator, with selection criteria and 2025 or 2026 recipients. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing money (grants or seed funding) going to local community start-ups: the scheme, amounts, recipients who are not only students, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Financial assistance (grants, seed funding, matched funding) to the local community for starting sustainable businesses | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether UNESA's Business and Technology Incubator (Inkubator Bisnis dan Teknologi, IBT) or any faculty runs a… |
What is still needed
- Any 2025 or 2026 disbursement list of UNESA's own grants, seed funding, equipment grants with value, or revolving funds to local-community (non-student) start-ups, including any UNESA funding that directs how a partner's charitable funds (such as YBM PLN's) are allocated to specific community businesses Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- The value of the DPPM Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2026 grant behind the auto egg steamer for UKM Telur Asin Krembangan, and confirmation the equipment was delivered to the business Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Whether UNESA's Business and Technology Incubator (Inkubator Bisnis dan Teknologi, IBT) or any faculty runs a seed-funding, matched-funding or revolving-fund scheme for local-community start-ups (as distinct from student PMW/P2MW funding), and any 2025/2026 disbursements Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
1.4.3Programmes for services access3 / 3worth 5.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Maximum one point for directly supplied, only 0.25 points for indirect programmes Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Direct: a free training for villagers on clean water treatment, sanitation or safe cooking fuel run by a UNESA faculty, with participants and a 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Direct: a community nutrition or child stunting programme delivered by UNESA staff and students, with the community reached and 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing a training improving community access to a basic service (health, water, sanitation, housing, electricity), with partner, numbers reached and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Directly supplied training/programme improving access to a basic service (health/nutrition or standard-of-living service) for all | Done | In the narration, section 1.4.3.1, 1 source (first: Melalui Program "BESEK", Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Dampingi Ibu-Ibu Desa…, 2026-05-08) |
| Indirect programme (e.g. UNESA funds or partners with another provider) improving access to a basic service | Not needed | The top option is already claimed |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A KKN 2026 (Kabupaten Malang) sub-programme report naming a specific basic service (health, nutrition, sanitation, water, electricity or housing) with a participant or household count Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Whether a BESEK style nutrition or basic service training also ran in 2025, or a second 2026 session, with its own participant count Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- An institutional or LPPM level programme or policy document on improving community access to basic services Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
1.4.4Policy addressing poverty2.25 / 3worth 5.8 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 points for each level of local, regional, national and global policy making. To raise it, see the Needs data criteria below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local: a UNESA lecturer sitting on a city or regency poverty reduction coordination team, or a UNESA study used by the local government, with date. 2. Regional or national: UNESA contributing a poverty study or policy paper to a provincial government or national ministry, or joining a national poverty task force, dated 2025 or 2026. 3. Global: a UNESA contribution to a UN, ASEAN or other international poverty policy forum or working group, with the body named and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the government or global body, what UNESA contributed to poverty policy (study, formal role, hosted roll-out), the level reached and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local policy making on poverty | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Regional policy making on poverty | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| National policy making on poverty | Done | In the narration, section 1.4.4.1, 2 sources (first: Unesa Siap Berkolaborasi Wujudkan Kampung Anti-Miskin Kemensos RI, 2025-02-10) |
| Global policy making on poverty | Needs data | Request 3 below: Any UNESA role in a global or multilateral poverty policy framework or process |
What is still needed
- A formal role for UNESA with Surabaya city's Bappeda or its poverty reduction coordination team (TKPK), such as membership, a study, or input into city level poverty planning Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- A formal role for UNESA with East Java province's Bappeda specifically on the province's own RPJMD poverty reduction targets, distinct from the Kemensos ministry level MoU Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Any UNESA role in a global or multilateral poverty policy framework or process Ask: International Office (Kantor Urusan Internasional)
- UNESA's own Sekolah Rakyat's enrollment figure, separate from East Java's 26 school, 2,489 student provincial total Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Any research, problem mapping report or policy recommendation document that the Kampung Anti Miskin MoU has produced since it was signed Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
SDG 2 · Zero HungerNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~24 of 46.1 points secured · quantitative 26.9 · THE-computed research 274 full points2 full points, fix before upload4 evidence missing2.1 Research on hunger 27 points · computed by THE from publications
2.2 Campus food waste 15.4 points
2.2.1Campus food waste tracking0 / 3worth 7.7 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 7.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Monthly food-waste weighing log kept by the Smart Eco-Campus unit (USSC) for every campus canteen at Ketintang, Lidah Wetan and Kampus Magetan, listing kilograms of leftover and plate waste per outlet, with dated entries in 2025 or 2026. 2. Canteen tenancy or catering contract clause obliging each outlet to weigh and report its food waste to the university each month, with the clause quoted and the contract year. 3. Food-waste audit report of one canteen or faculty (for example the Faculty of Food Security or the Tata Boga practice kitchen) stating method, kilograms discarded and the 2025 or 2026 period, to evidence partial measurement. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming who measures food waste from food served on campus, what is weighed, which canteens, campuses or units it covers (the whole university for the top tier), how often, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Whole university | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Partial measurement | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any catering or tenancy contract that requires an outsourced caterer or canteen tenant to measure and report food waste… |
What is still needed
- Records or a report showing that UNESA measures (weighs or logs) the food waste from food served on campus: who measures (canteen operators, Smart Eco-Campus unit, a faculty or study programme), what is recorded (plate waste, kitchen waste, composted food), the unit (kilograms or tonnes), the frequency, and which canteens or campuses are covered, with 2025 or 2026 dates Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Any catering or tenancy contract that requires an outsourced caterer or canteen tenant to measure and report food waste (THE accepts this for outsourced food services) Ask: Unit to be identified
- Weighing records of the Graduate School canteen-area organic waste and of the 'Unesa Go Zero Waste' programme announced on 9 May 2026, if they separate food waste Ask: Sekolah Pascasarjana (graduate school)
2.2.2Campus food waste (total food waste, campus population)worth 7.7 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
2.3 Student hunger 19.2 points
2.3.1Student food insecurity and hunger3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points, fix before upload
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the programme in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Student food-security programme of the Directorate of Student Affairs, such as a recurring free-meal scheme for students identified as food insecure through a scholarship-office or survey screening, with its start date and 2025 or 2026 operation. 2. Student welfare survey that measures how many students skip meals or cannot afford food, with the follow-up programme (subsidised meals, meal coupons, food pantry) it triggered in 2025 or 2026. 3. Rector's decree or circular setting up a continuing programme of free breakfast or subsidised meals for low-income students, stating eligibility, budget and the units that run it. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the student food-insecurity programme, the unit running it, how at-risk students are identified or measured, what it provides and to whom, and dated activity in 2025 or 2026 showing it continues beyond a one-off event. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Programme on student food insecurity | Done | In the narration, section 2.3.1.1, 15 sources (first: Program Sarapan Bergizi Unesa: Energi Optimal bagi Mahasiswa untuk Belajar, 2025-01-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- How students at risk of food insecurity are identified or measured (survey, scholarship-office screening or referral), and whether any food support exists outside exam weeks Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- Number of students (not packages) reached per exam period Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- The narration text holds a note for the PIC: "The sources describe this breakfast as the university's response and do not describe a survey that screens students at risk of food insecurity, so this narration presents the programme as UNESA's continuing, coordinated response and lists the identification of at-risk students as an open point for the SDG PIC." Settle it and remove the sentence before upload.
2.3.2Students hunger interventions3 / 3worth 2.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Provision of intervention 1 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free nutritious breakfast (sarapan bergizi gratis) distributed to students taking the semester final exams, stating the number of portions, the faculties covered and the dates in 2025 or 2026. 2. Free iftar (takjil and buka puasa) meals for students on campus during Ramadan, with dates, portions and the unit that organised them. 3. Campus food bank, pantry or meal-coupon scheme for students in need, with the dates it operated, items supplied and how many students used it. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming each hunger intervention for students, who ran it, how many portions or students were reached, who was eligible, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Interventions to prevent or alleviate student hunger | Done | In the narration, section 2.3.2.1, 12 sources (first: Program Sarapan Bergizi Unesa: Energi Optimal bagi Mahasiswa untuk Belajar, 2025-01-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Number of students reached per day or per exam period (the 39,000 and 35,000 totals count packages and portions, not students), and any eligibility rule other than showing the student card and signing the attendance list Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
2.3.3Sustainable food choices on campus3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the choices in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Menu list of the campus canteens showing vegetarian and vegan dishes at every outlet, with the outlets named and a 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Canteen tenancy rule requiring every on-campus food tenant to offer vegetable-based dishes and to source produce from local, pesticide-free or organic suppliers, with the clause quoted. 3. Campus food outlet (such as a university mart or faculty canteen) selling vegetables and fish grown on UNESA's own hydroponic, aquaponic and bioflok farms, with product list and dates, to evidence selected outlets. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page listing the on-campus food outlets, the sustainable, vegetarian or vegan choices each offers, whether all outlets or only some are covered, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| All food outlets | Done | In the narration, section 2.3.3.1, 5 sources (first: Agrinesa Mart: Menenun Hilirisasi Riset dan Jiwa Entrepreneurship di Jantung…, 2026-01-06) |
| Selected food outlets | Done | In the narration, section 2.3.3.1, 5 sources (first: Agrinesa Mart: Menenun Hilirisasi Riset dan Jiwa Entrepreneurship di Jantung…, 2026-01-06) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Menus or tenancy rules of the main UNESA canteens and the food court showing vegetarian or vegan dishes and locally or sustainably sourced produce, and whether Agrinesa Mart has opened to all students and staff Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Which of THE's sustainability features (trusted sources, low pesticide, local economy) apply to each Agrinesa Mart product, and its list of local suppliers Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- All evidence comes from one unit (Fakultas Ketahanan Pangan). A university-level source or examples from other faculties would show the practice is UNESA-wide.
2.3.4Healthy and affordable food choices0 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the choices in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Student price list of every campus canteen showing balanced meals at capped prices, with the price ceiling and the date. 2. Healthy-canteen (kantin sehat) programme under which tenants follow a nutritionist-reviewed menu with fruit, vegetables and no sugary drinks, stating the outlets covered and the 2025 or 2026 period. 3. Subsidised meal scheme (for example meals at a fixed low price in one faculty canteen) with prices, the outlet and dates, to evidence selected outlets. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the healthy and affordable food choices, the prices or price cap, what makes the meals healthy, which outlets are covered (all or selected), and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| All food outlets | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Selected food outlets | Needs data | Request 3 below: Decision by the SDG PIC whether the free breakfast packages of December 2025 and June 2026 (balanced menu of… |
What is still needed
- The price list or a price cap for food at the main UNESA canteens, food court and tenants (with the date), showing that choices are affordable for students Ask: Unit to be identified
- What makes the choices healthy at a named outlet: nutritionally balanced menus, a healthy-canteen programme or certification, or a nutritionist's review of the menu, plus any requirement UNESA sets on its on-campus or outsourced food providers Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Decision by the SDG PIC whether the free breakfast packages of December 2025 and June 2026 (balanced menu of carbohydrate, protein, vegetables, fruit and milk, free to all students in exam weeks, prepared by the Boganesa catering unit) may be claimed as a 'selected food outlet' answer Ask: SDG PIC
2.3.5Staff hunger interventions3 / 3worth 2.4 of 100Full points, fix before upload
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Provision of intervention 1 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free iftar or lunch packages for lecturers and non-academic staff during Ramadan 2026, with dates, portions and the unit that organised them. 2. Staff food-parcel (sembako) assistance for lower-paid or contract staff, such as cleaners and security guards, stating the number of recipients and the date in 2025 or 2026. 3. Subsidised staff canteen or staff meal allowance scheme, with its terms, price and period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming each intervention supplying food to members of staff, who ran it, how many staff were reached, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Interventions to prevent or alleviate hunger among staff | Done | In the narration, section 2.3.5.1, 3 sources (first: UNESA Berbagi Takjil dan Buka Bersama Selama Ramadan 2026, Perkuat Kepedulian…, 2026-02-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Any food support aimed at staff in need (food parcels, subsidised staff canteen, pantry), and the number of staff who received free meals at the Ramadan events Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The narration text holds a note for the PIC: "These are occasional Ramadan events rather than a staff food pantry, which THE's guidance accepts when the support is direct and practical; the sources name no staff-only scheme, so the SDG PIC is asked to confirm whether one exists." Settle it and remove the sentence before upload.
2.4 Proportion of graduates in agriculture and aquaculture including sustainability aspects 19.2 points
2.4.1Proportion of graduates in agriculture and aquacultureworth 19.2 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
2.5 National hunger 19.2 points
2.5.1Access to food security knowledge3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Provision of access up to 1 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free training for local farmers or fish farmers on bioflok aquaculture, hydroponics or urban farming run by the Faculty of Food Security, stating the date, village, number of participants and that no fee was charged. 2. Community-service (pengabdian masyarakat) programme transferring post-harvest processing or food-safety skills to village farmers' groups in 2025 or 2026, with its funding source showing it was free. 3. Open online course, extension handbook or digital farming tool made available free to local farmers, with usage figures and the release date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the food-security or sustainable farming knowledge, skill or technology offered, the local farmers or food producers who received it, whether it was free, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Done | In the narration, section 2.5.1.1, 9 sources (first: Tim Akuakultur UNESA Latih Warga Trepan Lamongan Teknologi Fermentasi dan…, 2026-06-02) |
| Paid | Needs data | Request 1 below: Written confirmation that farmers and food producers paid no fee for each activity (only the Trepan report names a… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Written confirmation that farmers and food producers paid no fee for each activity (only the Trepan report names a UNESA-funded grant), and the number of farmers or fishers trained per activity Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
2.5.2Events for local farmers and food producers3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Provision of events up to 1 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Farmer field day or harvest event hosted by the Faculty of Food Security where local farmers and food producers met lecturers, government officers and each other, with participants counted and the date. 2. Workshop or knowledge-transfer forum for village farmers and fishers on sustainable agriculture and aquaculture, with programme, speakers, attendance and the free-entry statement. 3. Roundtable between the university, regional government and farmer groups on local food sovereignty (kedaulatan pangan), with the attendance list and 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming each event for farmers and food producers, what knowledge was transferred or who connected, the number of participants, whether it was free, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Done | In the narration, section 2.5.2.1, 7 sources (first: Menyemai Solusi dari Rumah Ibadah: Sinergi Keahlian dan Kemandirian Lokal…, 2026-08-15) |
| Paid | Needs data | Request 1 below: Participant counts for each event and written confirmation that farmers paid no fee (only the Trepan report names a… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Participant counts for each event and written confirmation that farmers paid no fee (only the Trepan report names a UNESA-funded grant) Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
2.5.3University access to local farmers and food producers0 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Provision of access up to 1 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Teaching farm, hydroponic or aquaponic garden or aquaculture ponds of the Faculty of Food Security opened to local farmers for trials and learning, with the arrangement, users and dates. 2. Food or microbiology laboratory services (product testing, quality checks) offered free to local food producers and SMEs, with the number of users and dates in 2025 or 2026. 3. Seed, seedling or fish-fry stock supplied by the university to local farmers to improve their practices, with quantities, recipients and dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the university facilities, technology or plant stock that local farmers and food producers can use, how it improves sustainable farming, whether it is free, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether access or testing services are free or paid, and any tariff or booking rule |
| Paid | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether access or testing services are free or paid, and any tariff or booking rule |
What is still needed
- Evidence that local farmers or food producers used a UNESA facility in 2025 or 2026 (Smart Agriculture Techno Park, aquaculture ponds, laboratories, plant or fish stock, testing services): who used it, what for, how often, and the dates Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Whether access or testing services are free or paid, and any tariff or booking rule Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
2.5.4Sustainable food purchases0 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the prioritisation in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Procurement regulation or circular of the Rector with an operative clause giving priority to local and sustainably produced food and agricultural products in university purchasing, with its date. 2. Canteen or catering contract clause requiring tenants to buy vegetables, fish and staples from local farmers, with the clause quoted and the contract year. 3. University mart or kitchen buying produce from UNESA's own campus farms and named local farmer groups, with the supplier list and purchase dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the rule or practice that prioritises local, sustainable food purchases, what is bought and from whom, the unit responsible, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Prioritisation of products from local, sustainable sources | Needs data | Request 1 below: A purchasing rule or practice that prioritises food from local, sustainable sources: a procurement clause, a canteen… |
What is still needed
- A purchasing rule or practice that prioritises food from local, sustainable sources: a procurement clause, a canteen tenancy requirement, university mart sourcing from named local farmers, or purchase of produce from UNESA's own campus farms, with what is prioritised (supplier list, quota or preference clause) and 2025-2026 dates Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Purchase records or contracts showing that the free breakfast (Boganesa catering unit), the Ramadan takjil or university events buy from local farmers or small food producers Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- Whether Agrinesa Mart buys produce from local farmers beyond the faculty's own products, with a supplier list Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
SDG 3 · Good Health and Well-beingEvidence indicators: ~38.4 of 38.4 points secured · quantitative 34.6 · THE-computed research 277 full points3.1 Research on health and well-being 27 points · computed by THE from publications
3.2 Number graduating in health professions 34.6 points
3.2.1Proportion of graduates in health professionsworth 34.6 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
3.3 Collaborations and health services 38.4 points
3.3.1Current collaborations with health institutions3 / 3worth 7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local: an on-going partnership with a Surabaya hospital or community health centre (Puskesmas) for student placements or joint health services, with activities across 2025 or 2026. 2. National: continuing work with the Ministry of Health or a national health body, such as a joint training or surveillance programme, shown with dated activities. 3. Global: an on-going collaboration with WHO or an international health organisation, such as a joint project, with named partner and dated activities in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the health institution not owned by UNESA, its level (local, national or global), what the on-going collaboration involves and dated activities in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local collaboration | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.1.1, 4 sources (first: Dosen Psikologi UNESA Edukasi Kesehatan Mental Siswa MTs Hasyim Asy'ari melalui…, 2026-04-15) |
| National collaboration | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.1.1, 4 sources (first: Dosen Psikologi UNESA Edukasi Kesehatan Mental Siswa MTs Hasyim Asy'ari melalui…, 2026-04-15) |
| Global cooperation | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.1.1, 4 sources (first: Dosen Psikologi UNESA Edukasi Kesehatan Mental Siswa MTs Hasyim Asy'ari melalui…, 2026-04-15) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that the RSUD dr. Moewardi Surakarta agreement (D5) has produced an actual internship placement, teaching session or joint research output in 2025 or 2026, beyond the signing itself. Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
- Whether the Faculty of Medicine's exchange with Khon Kaen University (D6) is governed by a standing MoU or is a first-time arrangement, and whether a similar exchange happened in 2025. Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
- Whether the Faculty of Medicine or another UNESA unit has a further 2025 or 2026 touchpoint with the East Java Provincial Health Office or UNICEF beyond the 23 September 2026 workshop (D7). Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
- A university-wide register of current MoUs and implementation agreements with health institutions, with their signing dates and durations. Ask: Direktorat Kerja Sama (cooperation)
- Whether a further 2025 or 2026 touchpoint (placement, joint activity or renewal) followed the partnership, since the Dean's remarks frame continuation as a hope. Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
3.3.2Health outreach programmes3 / 3worth 7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local communities: a student volunteer health outreach on hygiene, nutrition or elderly exercise in a Surabaya neighbourhood, with the date and number of participants. 2. Disadvantaged people: a free health screening or nutrition programme for low-income families or people with disabilities, with the organiser and 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Refugees or immigrants: a health education or check-up session for refugees or migrant workers living near the campus, with date, partner and attendance. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing a health outreach programme: topic, audience (local, disadvantaged or refugee), organiser, the 2025 or 2026 date and number of participants. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local communities | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.2.1, 7 sources (first: Melalui Program "BESEK", Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Dampingi Ibu-Ibu Desa…, 2026-05-15) |
| Disadvantaged people | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.2.2, 3 sources (first: Peduli Semeru: FK UNESA dan SMCC Salurkan Bantuan Layanan Kesehatan dan Edukasi…, 2025-11-28) |
| Refugee/immigrant communities | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any outreach programme to a refugee or immigrant community local to the institution in 2025 or 2026. |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026 outreach activity on family planning delivered to the local community, or confirmation that no such activity exists. Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
- Any outreach programme to a refugee or immigrant community local to the institution in 2025 or 2026. Ask: Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT
- Participant or beneficiary counts for the GERAK and SOCA Puskesmas sessions and the JIRONA screenings. Ask: Faculty of Medicine (FK)
3.3.3Shared sports facilities3 / 3worth 2.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free access to all facilities: a policy letting local schools and the public use the stadium, courts and hall free on a regular schedule, with 2025 or 2026 evidence. 2. Charged access only: a published tariff for the public renting the sports hall or swimming pool, with a regular schedule and 2025 or 2026 usage. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the sports facility, who in the community may use it, how often (regular), whether free or charged with the fee, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free access to all facilities | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.3.1, 4 sources (first: Dukung Gaya Hidup Sehat Masyarakat, UNESA Informasikan Perpanjangan Akses…, 2026-05-31) |
| Free access to some facilities | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.3.1, 4 sources (first: Dukung Gaya Hidup Sehat Masyarakat, UNESA Informasikan Perpanjangan Akses…, 2026-05-31) |
| Charged access | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether entry to the UNESA 5 Cup football competition and use of Lapangan Maospati was free or charged for the… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether free public access to the Lidah Wetan athletics track continued after 31 July 2026, the stated end date of the announced extension, and the fee the public pays if one now applies (an April 2026 report said a public fee was planned but not yet set; a Google Maps review from about August 2026 mentions paying only for parking). Ask: BPU (business management board)
- Whether entry to the UNESA 5 Cup football competition and use of Lapangan Maospati was free or charged for the participating schools. Ask: Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences (FIKK)
- A fee schedule or tariff document for GOR Futsal, GOR Basket and other bookable facilities under BPU, and any 2025 or 2026 dated news showing regular school or public use of them. Ask: BPU (business management board)
3.3.4Sexual and reproductive health care services for students3 / 3worth 7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free access: a campus clinic or counselling service offering free sexual and reproductive health information, education sessions and consultation to students, with 2025 or 2026 activity. 2. Free access via signposting: a student orientation page directing students to a free reproductive health service at a partner Puskesmas or hospital, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the service (clinic or signposted partner), stating it covers sexual and reproductive health, students may use it, free or charged, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free access | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.4.1, 1 source (first: Talkshow SDG’s Series Prodi IPS UNESA Bahas SDGs 3: Kesehatan Mental Generasi…, 2026-05-21) |
| Charged access | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.4.1, 1 source (first: Talkshow SDG’s Series Prodi IPS UNESA Bahas SDGs 3: Kesehatan Mental Generasi…, 2026-05-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Attendance figures for the 19 May 2026 talkshow, and confirmation whether the Talkshow SDG's Series on reproductive health runs on a set schedule Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Whether UNESA's own campus clinic (Poliklinik) or SMCC provides a direct sexual or reproductive health-care service (contraception counselling, STI testing) in 2025 or 2026, beyond this BKKBN-partnered information session, and whether it is free or charged Ask: UPT Poliklinik (clinic)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
3.3.5Mental health support for students3 / 3worth 3.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Active promotion: a mental health awareness campaign or workshop series for students, with screening or stress-management sessions held in 2025 or 2026 and participant numbers. 2. Free support: a campus counselling centre or Faculty of Psychology service offering free confidential counselling to students, with opening hours and 2025 or 2026 use. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the mental health service or campaign for students, how to access it, whether it is free or charged, and a 2025 or 2026 date or activity. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Active promotion of good mental health | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.5.1, 2 sources (first: SMCC Unesa Tingkatkan Ketahanan Mental Mahasiswa melalui Latihan Mindfulness…, 2025-04-13) |
| Access to (or signposting to) free mental health support | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.5.2, 2 sources (first: RUPA: Sedjiwa, Layanan Konseling Gratis Fakultas Psikologi UNESA, 2026-03-14) |
| Access to (or signposting to) charged mental health support | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.5.2, 2 sources (first: RUPA: Sedjiwa, Layanan Konseling Gratis Fakultas Psikologi UNESA, 2026-03-14) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Participant numbers for the 13 April 2025 SMCC mindfulness training and the 28 to 29 August 2026 peer counselor training, to state the programmes' scale Ask: Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT
3.3.6Smoke-free policy4 / 4worth 8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Smoke-free campus: a Rector's regulation on Kawasan Tanpa Rokok banning tobacco at all indoor and outdoor locations, stating its issue or review date (2022-2026) and clauses. 2. Partial smoke-free: a Rector's decree banning smoking in buildings and events but allowing marked smoking areas, with the clause on designated areas and an issue date 2022-2026. 3. Supporting item: a public notice or signage guideline applying the policy across campus, dated 2025 or 2026 and showing the policy is still in force. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the smoke-free policy text: its title, issue or review date (2022-2026), and the clause saying whether all indoor and outdoor areas, or only buildings, are covered. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Smoking-free campus | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Partial smoke-free campus (smoking in designated areas) | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.6.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 31 Tahun 2023 tentang…, 2023-11-08) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026 record that the smoke-free policy is still applied, for example a Satgas KTR oversight report, updated signage, or a socialisation event Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
3.3.7Mental health support for staff3 / 3worth 3.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Active promotion: a staff well-being programme with mental health talks, burnout screening or stress workshops for lecturers and employees in 2025 or 2026. 2. Free support: an employee counselling service run by the Faculty of Psychology, stating staff may book free confidential sessions, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating that staff (not only students) can access mental health support or promotion, naming the service, whether free or charged, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Active promotion of good mental health | Done | In the narration, section 3.3.7.1, 2 sources (first: Direktorat PPIS Beri Pembekalan Antikekerasan dan Kesehatan Mental untuk Dosen…, 2025-04-08) |
| Access to (or signposting to) free mental health support | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 statement confirming that lecturers and education staff (not only students) may access SMCC's… |
| Access to (or signposting to) charged mental health support | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 statement confirming that lecturers and education staff (not only students) may access SMCC's… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026 statement confirming that lecturers and education staff (not only students) may access SMCC's counselling service, and whether it is free or charged Ask: Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT
SDG 4 · Quality EducationEvidence indicators: ~17.8 of 26.8 points secured · quantitative 46.2 · THE-computed research 272 full points2 can be strengthened1 evidence missing4.1 Research on early years and lifelong learning education 27 points · computed by THE from publications
4.2 Proportion of graduates with teaching qualification 15.4 points
4.2.1Proportion of graduates with relevant qualification for teachingworth 15.4 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
4.3 Lifelong learning measures 26.8 points
4.3.1Public resources (lifelong learning)2.4 / 3worth 5 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0.4 | Free courses leading to certificate or award 0.4, free access to campus facilities and equipment 0.4, free access to online resources 0.2. To raise it, see the Needs data criteria below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free courses leading to a certificate: an open short course or MOOC for the public with a free certificate, run in 2025 or 2026, stating who may join. 2. Free access to campus facilities: a rule letting non-students use the library reading rooms and computer lab at no charge, with opening hours and 2025 or 2026 evidence. 3. Free access to online resources: a public repository, e-journal portal or open learning platform usable without UNESA login or payment, with a 2025 or 2026 update. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming a free resource (certificate course, campus facility or online resource), stating it is free and open to non-students, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free courses leading to certificate or award | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.1.1, 4 sources (first: Membangun Anak Berkarakter di Era Modern, S3 IP Unesa Hadirkan Webinar…, 2026-05-25) |
| Free access to campus facilities and equipment | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any campus facility or equipment (library, laboratory, sports or study space) that people who are not UNESA students… |
| Free access to online resources | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.1.2, 1 source (first: Grownesa: Platform Kursus Resmi UNESA, 2026-09-26) |
What is still needed
- Participant numbers for the free public webinars run by S3 Ilmu Pendidikan (May 2026) and S2 Kimia (January 2026), and any other free certificated courses for the public in 2025. Ask: DIPD (digital learning)
- Any campus facility or equipment (library, laboratory, sports or study space) that people who are not UNESA students can use free of charge on a standing basis in 2025 or 2026, with the access rule. Ask: UPT Perpustakaan (library)
- A dated 2025 or 2026 course-run or enrolment announcement for Grownesa, and confirmation that registration is open to people who are not UNESA students or staff. Ask: DIPD (digital learning)
- Confirmation from DIPD that people outside UNESA can and do enrol in Grownesa's free courses (for example a count of non-UNESA learners). Ask: DIPD (digital learning)
4.3.2Public events (lifelong learning)2.25 / 3worth 5 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0.25 | All events free 1, both charged and free events 0.5, charged only 0.25. To raise it, see the Needs data criteria below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. All free: a calendar of public seminars, guest lectures and webinars open to everyone at no charge, with 2025 or 2026 dates and attendance figures. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page for a named event stating it was open to the general public (not only students or staff), any fee, the 2025 or 2026 date and attendance. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| All public events free to attend | Needs data | Request 1 below: An institution-wide record or dashboard of every public event UNESA hosts each year and its attendance, to confirm the… |
| Both charged and free public events | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.2.1, 7 sources (first: Inovasi Edukatif FK UNESA Warnai UNESA Innovation Product Exhibition 2025, 2025-11-27) |
| Charged-only public events | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.2.1, 7 sources (first: Inovasi Edukatif FK UNESA Warnai UNESA Innovation Product Exhibition 2025, 2025-11-27) |
What is still needed
- An institution-wide record or dashboard of every public event UNESA hosts each year and its attendance, to confirm the full 2025 and 2026 count and the exact share of free versus charged events beyond the examples found in published articles. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
4.3.3Vocational training events (lifelong learning)3 / 3worth 5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Both ad-hoc and programmed 1, programmed only 0.75, ad-hoc only 0.25 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Programmed: a regular short-course series, such as monthly Language Center or vocational training batches, with a published schedule and public registration in 2025 or 2026. 2. Programmed: an executive education or professional certification programme for working adults, run each semester by a UNESA training centre, with dates and participant numbers. 3. Ad-hoc: a one-off vocational workshop (for example digital skills or batik training) open to the public, with date, trainer and participants in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming a short course or vocational training that non-students could join, whether regular or one-off, who ran it, the 2025 or 2026 date and attendees. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Programmed (regular, scheduled) executive education or vocational training events | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.3.1, 1 source (first: Dosen S1 Kecerdasan Artifisial menjadi Fasilitator Pelatihan Koding dan KA…, 2025-07-01) |
| Ad-hoc executive education or vocational training events | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.3.1, 1 source (first: Dosen S1 Kecerdasan Artifisial menjadi Fasilitator Pelatihan Koding dan KA…, 2025-07-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A dated 2025 or 2026 news article or course schedule for UNESA's Language Center (UPT Pusat Bahasa) or Confucius Institute showing a course or examination (for example HSK/HSKK) open to the public with its fee, to add a second standing programmed offering beside LPSP's teacher training. Ask: Language units (Pusat Bahasa, Confucius Institute, BIPA)
- Confirmation of whether the BIPA programme runs a short course for external partner universities on a regular annual or semesterly schedule, not only the 2026 BUFS cohort, and whether previous cohorts' dates and partner names can be documented. Ask: Language units (Pusat Bahasa, Confucius Institute, BIPA)
- Evidence that LPSP's coding and AI teacher training took place as scheduled from July 2025: session dates, venue (on UNESA's campus or elsewhere) and the number of teachers trained, and any 2026 continuation. Ask: LPSP (professional education and certification)
4.3.4Education outreach activities beyond campus3 / 3worth 5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Both ad-hoc and programmed 1, programmed only 0.75, ad-hoc only 0.25 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Programmed: a regular teaching or literacy programme in partner schools or villages by students (for example Kampus Mengajar or KKN), with a schedule and 2025 or 2026 dates. 2. Programmed: a recurring science demonstration or tailored lecture series for local schools, run by a named faculty each semester, with school names and participant numbers. 3. Ad-hoc: a one-off outreach lecture or workshop at a village hall or school, with the date in 2025 or 2026, location and number of attendees. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing outreach held off campus (school, village or community site): the activity, the audience reached, the UNESA unit, whether recurring, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Programmed (regular, scheduled) outreach beyond campus | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.4.1, 2 sources (first: Mahasiswa Matematika Unesa Gelar MATHECS 2026, Seminggu Mengabdi untuk…, 2026-07-20) |
| Ad-hoc outreach beyond campus | Done | In the narration, section 4.3.4.1, 2 sources (first: Mahasiswa Matematika Unesa Gelar MATHECS 2026, Seminggu Mengabdi untuk…, 2026-07-20) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- MATHECS's 2024 and 2025 editions (dates, village, participant counts) and Fakultas Hukum Berdampak's session dates after its 7 July 2026 launch Ask: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
- Whether the BPPG deep-learning training for PPG alumni teachers (13 September 2025) was held on or off campus Ask: BPPG (teacher professional education)
- An aggregate count of off-campus outreach activities, schools, villages and people reached across 2025 and 2026 Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
4.3.5Lifelong learning access policy0 / 4worth 6.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 6.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's regulation on access to public learning activities stating no discrimination by ethnicity, religion, disability, immigration status or gender, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A Rector's decree or service policy for the public training centre guaranteeing accessible short courses for people with disabilities and all groups, with article numbers and a 2022-2026 date. 3. A published inclusion policy of the disability service centre covering open public events and online resources, naming the grounds and showing an issue or review date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the policy text: title, issue or review date (2022-2026), and the clause opening public learning to all regardless of ethnicity, religion, disability, immigration status or gender. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy exists ensuring access to lifelong learning activities (4.3.1-4.3.4) for all | Needs data | Request 1 below: The rector regulation or decree, with its number and date (2022-2026), that states access to UNESA's public… |
| Covers ethnicity, religion, disability, immigration status and gender (name which grounds the policy text actually states) | Needs data | Request 1 below: The rector regulation or decree, with its number and date (2022-2026), that states access to UNESA's public… |
| Policy date (created or reviewed 2022-2026, with the pasal/article number) | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether any non-discrimination clause exists for UNESA's public-facing services (Grownesa, LP3 short courses, public… |
What is still needed
- The rector regulation or decree, with its number and date (2022-2026), that states access to UNESA's public lifelong-learning activities (free courses, public events, vocational training, off-campus outreach) is open regardless of ethnicity, religion, disability, immigration status and gender, for participants who are not enrolled UNESA students. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- Confirmation of whether Rector's Regulation No. 11 of 2024's non-discrimination clause (Pasal 11 ayat (1)) has been applied, or was intended to apply, to members of the public taking part in UNESA's webinars, open houses, training or outreach, and not only to the academic community defined in Pasal 1 angka 10. Ask: Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT
- Whether any non-discrimination clause exists for UNESA's public-facing services (Grownesa, LP3 short courses, public events). The Jalur Disabilitas admission track rests on Rector's Regulation Number 14 of 2024, Article 7(1)(e) and 7(6), which covers degree admissions only. Ask: Direktorat Pendidikan dan Transformasi Pembelajaran
- Any written access or non-discrimination statement published by PUI-PID (Disability Innovation Center), Grownesa or LP3 for participants who are not UNESA students or staff. Ask: PUID (Disability Innovation Center)
4.4 Proportion of first-generation students 30.8 points
4.4.1Proportion of first-generation studentsworth 30.8 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
SDG 5 · Gender EqualityEvidence indicators: ~7.7 of 30.7 points secured · quantitative 42.3 · THE-computed research 275 full points8 evidence missing5.1 Research on gender equality 27 points · computed by THE from publications
5.2 Proportion of first-generation female students 15.4 points
5.2.1Proportion of women first-generationworth 15.4 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
5.3 Student access measures 15.4 points
5.3.1Tracking access measures0 / 3worth 1.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A yearly admissions report giving applicants, accepted and enrolled students by gender for each route (SNBP, SNBT, Mandiri) for the 2025 intake, with the unit that compiles it. 2. A dashboard or Rector's report that tracks women's application rate and acceptance rate each year, stating who monitors it and how often, with 2025 figures. 3. A published gender-disaggregated admissions table showing the computed application and entry rates for women and men in 2025. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing 2025 admissions figures by gender (applicants, admitted, enrolled and the rates), the routes covered and the unit that monitors them. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring women's application rate | Needs data | Request 2 below: How the tracking works: the system that records applicant gender (SIAKAD / admissions system), the unit that reviews… |
| Tracking women's acceptance or entry rate | Needs data | Request 2 below: How the tracking works: the system that records applicant gender (SIAKAD / admissions system), the unit that reviews… |
What is still needed
- 2025 intake figures split by gender: applicants, admitted and enrolled women and men per route (SNBP, SNBT, Mandiri), with the computed application and acceptance rates Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- How the tracking works: the system that records applicant gender (SIAKAD / admissions system), the unit that reviews the figures and how often Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
5.3.2Policy for women applications and entry0 / 4worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's regulation on gender equality or an access and participation plan with clauses on women's applications, acceptance and entry, giving its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A university gender mainstreaming policy that addresses women's participation, such as equal chances in programmes, with article numbers and a 2022-2026 date. 3. A Rector's decree setting actions to raise women's applications to under-represented programmes, with named clauses and a date between 2022 and 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the policy text: title, issue or review date (2022-2026) and the clauses that name women, sex or gender in applications, entry and participation. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy addressing women's applications | Needs data | Request 1 below: Any UNESA policy dated 2022-2026 (for example a gender mainstreaming plan, an access and participation plan, or an… |
| Policy addressing women's acceptance and entry | Needs data | Request 1 below: Any UNESA policy dated 2022-2026 (for example a gender mainstreaming plan, an access and participation plan, or an… |
| Policy addressing women's participation at the university | Needs data | Request 1 below: Any UNESA policy dated 2022-2026 (for example a gender mainstreaming plan, an access and participation plan, or an… |
What is still needed
- Any UNESA policy dated 2022-2026 (for example a gender mainstreaming plan, an access and participation plan, or an internal circular) that specifically addresses women's applications, acceptance, entry or participation; the two admissions regulations checked so far (Perrek 14/2024 and Peraturan Senat Akademik 6/2025) contain no clause naming women, sex or gender Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
5.3.3Women’s access schemes0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Mentoring 0.4, scholarship 0.4, other provision 0.2 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Mentoring: a women-only mentoring programme where senior female lecturers or alumni coach female students, with the organiser, dates in 2025 and number of participants. 2. Scholarship: a scholarship or tuition support open to women only, or giving priority to women, with eligibility rules and the number of 2025 recipients. 3. Other provision: a women-focused support such as a leadership bootcamp, safe transport or a women's study room, with the organiser, 2025 dates and users. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the scheme for women (mentoring, scholarship or other support), who may join, the organiser, the 2025 or 2026 date and number of participants. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Mentoring (for women) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 mentoring scheme aimed at women students (name, organiser, dates, participants) |
| Scholarship (for women) | Needs data | Request 2 below: A 2025 or 2026 scholarship reserved for or prioritising women (name, funder, eligibility, recipients) |
| Other provision (for women) | Needs data | Request 3 below: Any other 2025 or 2026 provision for women's access, with a dated public source (for example the women-only Rusunawa… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 mentoring scheme aimed at women students (name, organiser, dates, participants) Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- A 2025 or 2026 scholarship reserved for or prioritising women (name, funder, eligibility, recipients) Ask: Scholarship unit
- Any other 2025 or 2026 provision for women's access, with a dated public source (for example the women-only Rusunawa buildings A-C at Lidah Wetan, with 2025 occupancy) Ask: Student housing (Rusunawa)
5.3.4Women’s application in underrepresented subjects0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | University outreach 0.5, collaboration 0.5 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. University outreach: school visits or an open day session inspiring girls to apply to engineering, physics or computing programmes, with date, participants and the women's share in the subject. 2. Collaboration: a joint regional campaign with a ministry, NGO or another university encouraging girls into STEM, naming the partner, scope and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Outreach: a webinar series with female role models in under-represented subjects aimed at female senior-high students, with dates and attendance. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the subject where women are under-represented (with the share), the outreach or campaign for women, any partner, the scope and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Through university outreach | Needs data | Request 1 below: 2025 or 2026 outreach aimed at encouraging women to apply to subjects where they are underrepresented (for example the… |
| Through collaboration with other universities, community groups, government or NGOs in regional or national campaigns | Needs data | Request 2 below: A 2025 or 2026 regional or national campaign run with a named partner (government, NGO, schools or universities) for… |
What is still needed
- 2025 or 2026 outreach aimed at encouraging women to apply to subjects where they are underrepresented (for example the Women in Engineering and Innovation programme named in last year's file): name, date, target, reach, subjects Ask: Faculty of Engineering (FT)
- A 2025 or 2026 regional or national campaign run with a named partner (government, NGO, schools or universities) for the same purpose Ask: Faculty of Engineering (FT)
- The women's share in the underrepresented programmes (for example Mechanical, Civil, Electrical Engineering), 2025 intake Ask: Direktorat Akademik
5.4 Proportion of senior female academics 15.4 points
5.4.1Proportion of senior female academicsworth 15.4 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
5.5 Proportion of women receiving degrees 11.5 points
5.5.1Proportion of female degrees awardedworth 11.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
5.6 Women's progress measures 15.3 points
5.6.1Policy of non-discrimination against women4 / 4worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's regulation on preventing and handling sexual violence (Satgas PPKS/PPKPT) that prohibits discrimination against women, with article numbers and an issue date 2022-2026. 2. A university code of ethics clause banning sexual harassment and gender discrimination for students and staff, with the enforcing unit named and a 2022-2026 date. 3. A Rector's decree listing inappropriate sexual behaviour (comments, touching, obscene gestures) as prohibited, applying to students and staff, with its issue or review date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the policy text: title, issue or review date (2022-2026) and clauses that prohibit discrimination against women and inappropriate sexual behaviour for students and staff. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Prohibits discrimination against women | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.1.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| Covers inappropriate sexual behaviour | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.1.2, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| Applies to students and staff (scope, and the unit that enforces it) | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.1.3, 5 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
5.6.2Non-discrimination policies for transgender4 / 4worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's regulation that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity or against transgender people, naming those words in a clause, with an issue or review date 2022-2026. 2. A university code of conduct stating non-discrimination on sex, sexual orientation and gender identity, with the sexual behaviour rules and a 2022-2026 date. 3. An equality policy listing gender identity among protected grounds for students and staff, with article numbers and the issue date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the policy text: title, issue or review date (2022-2026) and the clause that explicitly names gender identity or transgender people, plus the inappropriate sexual behaviour rules. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity (transgender people) | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.2.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| Covers inappropriate sexual behaviour | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.2.2, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Pasal 11 of Rector's Regulation 11/2024 lists sex (jenis kelamin) but not gender identity among the grounds of discrimination; the only explicit mention of gender identity is Pasal 9 ayat (2) huruf a. Confirm whether any UNESA policy names gender identity or transgender people as a protected ground, and whether the SDG 5 PIC is content to claim 5.6.2 on this clause. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
5.6.3Maternity policy4 / 4worth 0.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 0.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A staff regulation or HR page stating maternity leave length, pay and eligibility for women employees, with issue or review date between 2022 and 2026. 2. A Rector's rule on academic leave and study flexibility for pregnant students and new mothers, with article numbers and a 2022-2026 date. 3. A published guideline on lactation rooms and breastfeeding breaks for staff and students, with its issue or review date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the maternity policy: title, issue or review date (2022-2026), leave length and pay for staff, and the provisions for pregnant students and new mothers. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Maternity leave for women staff (length, pay, eligibility) | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.3.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 37 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-11-01) |
| Provision for pregnant students and new mothers (academic leave, study flexibility, lactation rooms) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Provisions for pregnant students and new mothers (academic leave or study flexibility) in the academic regulations… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Provisions for pregnant students and new mothers (academic leave or study flexibility) in the academic regulations, dated 2022-2026 Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
5.6.4Childcare facilities for students0 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Free access 1, paid access only 0.25 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free access: a campus childcare centre (TPA) open to student mothers at no charge, with hours, age range, how to register and a 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Free access: a faculty child-friendly room or day-care cooperation giving student parents free places, with a registration process and 2025 or 2026 evidence. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the childcare facility, stating students may use it so mothers can attend classes, its hours, registration, whether free or paid, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare facility open to students (name, location, operator) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether students pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free… |
| Allows recent mothers to attend courses (hours, age range, how to register) | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Free access, or Paid access (the fee) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether students pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free… |
What is still needed
- Whether students pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free access 1, paid 0.25) Ask: Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool
5.6.5Childcare facilities for staff and faculty0 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Free access 1, paid access only 0.25 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free access: a campus childcare centre open to lecturers and employees at no cost, with hours, age range and registration, and a 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Free access: an employer-supported day-care place or allowance for staff children, stating staff eligibility and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the childcare facility, stating staff and faculty are eligible, its hours, whether free or paid with the fee, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Childcare facility open to staff and faculty | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether staff and lecturers pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE… |
| Free access, or Paid access (the fee) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether staff and lecturers pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE… |
What is still needed
- Whether staff and lecturers pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free access 1, paid 0.25) Ask: Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool
5.6.6Women’s mentoring schemes0 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A named women's mentoring programme pairing female students with female lecturers or alumni, stating 2025 participants as a share of all female students, at least 10 percent. 2. A faculty-wide women's mentoring scheme with capacity for many students, showing the organiser, structure and 2025 participant count against the number of female students. 3. A women in leadership mentoring cycle with a report giving participants and the total female enrolment for 2025, and the resulting rate. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the women's mentoring scheme, its organiser and structure, and 2025 participant numbers against all female students, showing the rate is at least 10 percent. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Women's mentoring scheme (name, organiser, structure) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A women's mentoring scheme in 2025 or 2026 with its number of female participants and the total number of female… |
| At least 10% of female students participate (2025 participants, all female students, the rate) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A women's mentoring scheme in 2025 or 2026 with its number of female participants and the total number of female… |
What is still needed
- A women's mentoring scheme in 2025 or 2026 with its number of female participants and the total number of female students, showing at least 10% take part Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
5.6.7Track women’s graduation rate0 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A yearly report of completion and on-time graduation rates for women and men, comparing the two and stating the unit that tracks it, for a 2025 cohort. 2. A scheme to close a graduation gap, such as mentoring or academic support for female students at risk, with dates in 2025 or 2026 and numbers supported. 3. A published monitoring statement showing women's graduation rate compared to men's with no gap found and continued yearly tracking planned. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing completion or graduation rates by gender (women compared to men), the cohort and year, and any scheme to close the gap or the continued monitoring. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Measuring women's likelihood of graduating compared to men's (completion rates by gender) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Graduation (completion) rates of women and men for the cohort graduating in 2025, ideally 2021-2025 |
| Schemes in place to close any gap (or, if there is no gap, the continued monitoring) | Needs data | Request 2 below: The scheme in place to close any gap, with its 2025 or 2026 activity (or a statement that no gap exists and monitoring… |
What is still needed
- Graduation (completion) rates of women and men for the cohort graduating in 2025, ideally 2021-2025 Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- The scheme in place to close any gap, with its 2025 or 2026 activity (or a statement that no gap exists and monitoring continues) Ask: Direktorat Akademik
5.6.8Policies protecting those reporting discrimination4 / 4worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's regulation on handling discrimination or sexual violence stating complainants and witnesses are protected from retaliation in grades and employment, with article numbers and a 2022-2026 date. 2. A Satgas PPKS/PPKPT procedure guaranteeing confidentiality and no academic or employment disadvantage to those who report, with its issue or review date. 3. A whistleblower or complaint policy clause protecting staff reporting discrimination from dismissal or demotion, dated between 2022 and 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the policy text: title, issue or review date (2022-2026) and the clauses protecting people who report discrimination from academic and employment disadvantage. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Protects those reporting discrimination from educational disadvantage | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.8.1, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| Protects those reporting discrimination from employment disadvantage | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.8.1, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A clause protecting education staff who report sexual violence from job or career disadvantage (anti-retaliation). Rector's Regulation 11/2024 protects victims, witnesses and companions but names no job protection; Rector's Regulations 9/2025 (code of ethics) and 29/2025 (staff discipline) were read in full and contain no reporter-protection clause. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
5.6.9Paternity policy4 / 4worth 0.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 0.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A UNESA staff regulation or HR page stating paternity leave length, pay and eligibility for fathers, with an issue or review date between 2022 and 2026. 2. A university rule that applies national civil-service (ASN) paternity leave to UNESA staff, stating the days granted and how it is applied, with a 2022-2026 date. 3. A policy clause enabling fathers to take part in childcare duties, such as flexible hours after birth, with its issue date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the paternity policy: title, issue or review date (2022-2026), the leave length and pay for fathers, and how it lets fathers share childcare. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Paternity leave for fathers (length, pay, eligibility) | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.9.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 37 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-11-01) |
| Enables fathers to take part in childcare duties | Done | In the narration, section 5.6.9.2, 1 source (first: Dari Fatherless Menuju Fatherhood, Satgas PPK UNESA Dorong Ayah Lebih Hadir…, 2026-07-24) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The national rule says paternity leave 'may be granted' (dapat diberikan) for up to one month. Confirm UNESA's usual practice (days normally granted) and whether the same applies to fixed-term PTNBH staff. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
SDG 6 · Clean Water and SanitationNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~36.9 of 63.5 points secured · quantitative 9.5 · THE-computed research 278 full points6 evidence missing6.1 Research on water 27 points · computed by THE from publications
6.2 Water consumption per person 19 points
6.2.1Water consumption tracking3 / 3worth 9.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 9.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. PDAM bill recap listing every campus meter account (Ketintang, Lidah Wetan, Magetan, faculties) with monthly volumes in cubic metres for 2025 or 2026. 2. Monthly water-use register kept by the facilities unit, with a total per campus and per building group, dated entries in 2025 or 2026. 3. Environment-office water balance or annual water report stating mains water volume used by the university and the measuring method. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page or report showing the water measurement (meters or bills), the campuses and units covered (the whole university), the volumes or the measuring method, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Whole-university measurement | Needs data | Request 1 below: Meter readings and bills for the Magetan campus (Kampus Unesa Magetan, which has an empty row in the recap), and a list… |
| Partial measurement | Done | In the narration, section 6.2.1.1, 4 sources (first: Rekap Pembayaran Rekening Air Direktorat Aset (Rekap Tagihan Air), 2025) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Meter readings and bills for the Magetan campus (Kampus Unesa Magetan, which has an empty row in the recap), and a list of every PDAM meter account by campus, to prove whole-university measurement. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Confirm the year of the recap and supply cubic metres for July to December. The sheet title reads 'TAHUN 2025' but the file is named 'Rekap Tagihan Air 2026'; it holds cubic metres for January to June only and bill amounts for January to December. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Check two entries that look like typing errors before any total is quoted: 6,544 m3 for March against a bill of Rp 174,070 (account of the Surabaya state school Teratai 4), and 3,462 m3 for January against a bill of Rp 1,276,140 (Kawung 9 account). Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- A public page or report on unesa.ac.id stating that UNESA measures its mains water use, with the campuses covered. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- D1, D2, D3 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
6.2.2Water consumption per personworth 9.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
6.3 Water usage and care 23 points
6.3.1Wastewater treatment3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Technical approval from the city environment office for each wastewater treatment plant, with number, date, capacity and the buildings served, plus proof the plant operates (operation log or photographs). 2. Public page describing the campus wastewater plant: treatment units (screen, aeration, settling, chlorination), capacity and where treated water goes, with 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Competency certificates of the plant operators and a maintenance record (grease trap cleaning, sludge removal) in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the wastewater treatment process, the plant units and capacity, the campus and buildings served, who operates it, and dates showing it was in place in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Process in place to treat wastewater | Done | In the narration, section 6.3.1.1, 7 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kegiatan Sarana Pelayanan Umum…, 2025-07-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Which IPAL are built and running in 2025 and 2026, with the operational readiness letters (SLO), daily flow records and monthly effluent test reports. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- PIC decision on whether the septic-tank arrangement counts as 'a process in place to treat wastewater' for upload. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The Ketintang wastewater technical approval No. 600.4.5.2/987/436.7.10/2024 of 30 December 2024, which is cited in the Ketintang document but is not in the folder. Ask: Unit to be identified
- Desludging records for 2025 and for the other buildings and for Ketintang. Ask: Unit to be identified
- D5 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- D2, D3, D1, D4, D5, D6 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
6.3.2Preventing water system pollution3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Environment document commitments, in force, to test treated wastewater monthly against the national quality standard and to sample upstream and downstream monitoring wells, with reports to the city environment office. 2. Emergency SOP of the wastewater plant or hazardous-waste store describing the steps for a spill, with a dated drill or incident record in 2025 or 2026. 3. Public page describing separated rainwater and wastewater drains, grease traps and the hazardous-waste store that keep contaminated water out of drains and rivers. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the processes that keep pollution out of the water system, including the accident and incident response, who runs them, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Processes to prevent polluted water entering the water system | Done | In the narration, section 6.3.2.1, 6 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kegiatan Sarana Pelayanan Umum…, 2025-07-28) |
| Processes for pollution caused by accidents and incidents | Done | In the narration, section 6.3.2.2, 4 sources (first: Arahan Rincian Teknis Pengelolaan (Penyimpanan) Limbah B3 oleh Universitas…, 2023-11-13) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Records that the practices run in 2025 and 2026: grease trap and septic tank service logs, monthly effluent test reports, and groundwater monitoring well results. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Confirm that a hazardous-waste store exists and holds spill kits at each campus, with a dated photograph. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The current hazardous-waste agreements and electronic manifests of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences laboratories (the file holds only a 2024 expiry reminder and a 2026 service offer). Ask: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
- A public page on unesa.ac.id describing these processes. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1, D4, D7, D3, D5, D2, D6 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
6.3.3Free drinking water provided3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. List of drinking water dispenser or fountain locations across campuses (faculty buildings, library, dormitory, student centre) with photographs dated 2025 or 2026. 2. News or campaign page on tumbler use at the campus drinking water refill points, stating the points are free and open to students, staff and visitors. 3. Facilities record of installing and maintaining free refill stations, with the number of units per campus and the year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the free drinking water points, where they are, who can use them free of charge, and dates in 2025 or 2026, ideally with photographs. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free drinking water for students, staff and/or visitors | Done | In the narration, section 6.3.3.1, 2 sources (first: UI GreenMetric evidence template [3.2] Program to reduce the use of paper and…, 2026-10-05) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A list of the drinking-water dispensers by building and campus (number, location, installation date) and a dated photograph of each campus's points. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Confirm whether visitors may use the dispensers and whether the student-card (KTM) limit planned in March 2026 is in force. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public page or news item on unesa.ac.id about the dispensers. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
6.3.4Water-conscious building standards0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Technical specification (RKS) for a campus building requiring water-saving fixtures and metering, dated 2025 or 2026. 2. Design guideline or Peraturan Rektor on sustainable buildings with water-saving clauses (rainwater harvesting, greywater reuse), with number and date. 3. Public page on a new building certified or designed to a green building standard with the water measures listed. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the building standard, its water-saving requirements, the buildings it applies to, and its date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Building standards that minimise water use | Needs data | Request 1 below: A building standard, design guideline or tender specification that minimises water use (water-saving fixtures with flow… |
What is still needed
- A building standard, design guideline or tender specification that minimises water use (water-saving fixtures with flow limits, rainwater harvesting or greywater reuse in new buildings), with issuer, number and date, applied to UNESA buildings in 2025 or 2026. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Confirm whether taps, flush systems and urinals in 2025 and 2026 construction or renovation tenders carry flow limits or a water-saving label. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
6.3.5Water-conscious planting0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Planting list for a campus garden using drought-tolerant or native species, with area, location and planting date in 2025 or 2026. 2. Landscape maintenance plan describing drip or timed irrigation and mulching to cut water use, with the responsible unit. 3. News item on a campus green space designed for low water use, with photographs and the species used. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the landscape, the water-saving planting or irrigation method, where it is on campus, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Landscapes planted to minimise water usage | Needs data | Request 1 below: A planting scheme or landscape plan showing drought-tolerant or native species, mulching, or drip or timed irrigation… |
What is still needed
- A planting scheme or landscape plan showing drought-tolerant or native species, mulching, or drip or timed irrigation on campus green space, with site, area and date (2025 or 2026). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
6.4 Water reuse 12 points
6.4.1Water reuse policy4 / 4worth 6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on eco-campus environmental management requiring reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation and rainwater harvesting, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. City environmental approval document (DELH) binding UNESA to irrigate green space with treated IPAL effluent and to reuse rainwater and ablution water, dated 2024 or 2025. 3. Smart Eco-Campus circular instructing faculties to reuse greywater and rainwater, with effective date and units covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy title, issuer, what reuse it requires (treated wastewater, rainwater), where it applies, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy to maximise water reuse across the university | Done | In the narration, section 6.4.1.1, 8 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 12 Tahun 2026 tentang…, 2026-04-14) |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Done | In the narration, section 6.4.1.2, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 12 Tahun 2026 tentang…, 2026-04-14) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- PIC decision on whether Article 9(4) of Rector's Regulation 12/2026 and the environmental evaluation commitments count as a 'policy to maximise water reuse across the university', or whether a stand-alone reuse circular exists. Ask: SDG PIC
- Confirm which policy was in place during 2025. Ask: SDG PIC
- Make an extract of the environmental decisions public (for example on unesa.ac.id). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Evidence that the treated-water reuse runs (see 6.3.1: plant status and operation records). Ask: Unit to be identified
- D4 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- D2, D3, D4, D5 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
6.4.2Water reuse measurement0 / 3worth 6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Monthly logbook of treated wastewater volume used for watering green space, read from the flowmeter at each plant outlet, 2025 or 2026. 2. Water balance sheet (Neraca pencatatan pembuangan dan pemanfaatan air limbah) submitted to the city environment office for a semester in 2025 or 2026. 3. Rainwater harvest or ablution water reuse record with volumes and dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page or report showing the reuse measurement (method, plants and campuses covered, volumes) with dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement of water reuse across the university | Needs data | Request 1 below: Records that UNESA measures reuse of water: flow meter readings at the plant outlets or watering points, the wastewater… |
What is still needed
- Records that UNESA measures reuse of water: flow meter readings at the plant outlets or watering points, the wastewater discharge and reuse record for semester 1 2026 (listed in the inspection checklist; no such file is among the added documents), and a reuse or water balance log. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Any metering of the reuse practices already seen in the faculties (air-conditioner condensate and aquaponics recirculation at the Faculty of Food Security, 2026). Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
6.5 Water in the community 19 points
6.5.1Water management educational opportunities0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Community service (pengabdian masyarakat) workshop for villagers on clean water filtering and rainwater harvesting, free of charge, with date, place and attendance in 2025 or 2026. 2. Public training series on water conservation for schools and neighbourhood groups run by a faculty or the Smart Eco-Campus unit, dated entries. 3. Paid short course on water and sanitation management open to the public, with fee and dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the water-management education for communities, who attends, whether it is free or paid, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free opportunities | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether the biopori education sessions at SDN 1 Karah Surabaya (20 November 2025) and SMAN 22 Surabaya (25 November… |
| Paid opportunities | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- Whether the biopori education sessions at SDN 1 Karah Surabaya (20 November 2025) and SMAN 22 Surabaya (25 November 2025), run by Sociology students with the Menabung Air Foundation, were free of charge, and who attended (pupils, teachers, parents, residents). Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- A community training or public lecture on water management by LPPM or a faculty in 2025 or 2026, with its date, fee and attendance. Example to check: the training of villagers in eco-enzyme to reduce pollutants in tempeh wastewater in Sukoruo village, Trenggalek (Physics group of FMIPA, LPPM-faculty programme 2025, posted 1 December 2025). Ask: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
6.5.3Off-campus water conservation support3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Community service project installing infiltration wells and biopori in a village, with place, date, partner and number of units in 2025 or 2026. 2. Rainwater harvesting tanks built at a school or village hall by a faculty team, with photographs and dates. 3. Tree planting along a river or spring catchment by students and staff, with location, species count and date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the off-campus water conservation activity, where and with whom, what was done in practice, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Support for practical water conservation off campus | Done | In the narration, section 6.5.3.1, 3 sources (first: Kolaborasi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Surabaya dan Yayasan Menabung Air…, 2025-12-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Counts for the 2025 activities: number of biopori holes dug and pupils reached at SDN 1 Karah and SMAN 22, number and capacity of the purifiers installed in Keurombok, and a dated photograph of each. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Confirm the date of the SMAN 22 session (the article has the dateline 25 November 2025 and was posted 26 November 2025). Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
6.5.4Sustainable water extraction on campus0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the applicable technologies in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Groundwater well permit with a meter and a volume limit for a campus well, and a log showing extraction within the limit in 2025 or 2026. 2. Solar-powered pump and recharge (infiltration) wells at a campus site that return water to the aquifer, with installation date. 3. Environment document or public page describing how extracted water is metered and limited so the source is not depleted. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the water source UNESA extracts, the sustainable technology used, where it is, and dates showing it was in place in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable water extraction technologies on university grounds | Needs data | Request 1 below: Confirmation that UNESA extracts no groundwater or surface water on or off campus, including the Magetan campus and… |
What is still needed
- Confirmation that UNESA extracts no groundwater or surface water on or off campus, including the Magetan campus and faculty farms and ponds. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- If any well, borehole, river or pond intake exists (for example at Magetan or at the aquaculture ponds of the Faculty of Food Security), its permit, meter and technology. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
6.5.5Cooperation on water security0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. MoU between UNESA and the city environment or water resources office on water quality monitoring or flood control, dated 2025 or 2026. 2. Joint project with a provincial or river basin authority on river water quality, with UNESA's role and dates. 3. Advisory role on a national water security policy or a ministry programme, with a letter of appointment or a public page. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the government bodies, their level, the water-security work done together, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local government cooperation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A formal cooperation with a government body on water security (MoU, joint project or advisory role), with its… |
| Regional government cooperation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A formal cooperation with a government body on water security (MoU, joint project or advisory role), with its… |
| National government cooperation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A formal cooperation with a government body on water security (MoU, joint project or advisory role), with its… |
| Global government cooperation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A formal cooperation with a government body on water security (MoU, joint project or advisory role), with its… |
What is still needed
- A formal cooperation with a government body on water security (MoU, joint project or advisory role), with its instrument and date in 2025 or 2026, for each level: local (city or regency), regional (province or river basin authority), national (ministry or agency), global. Ask: International Office (Kantor Urusan Internasional)
- Any cooperation with Perumda Air Minum Surya Sembada (Surabaya's municipal water company) or the Surabaya City Environment Office beyond student placements or permits. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
6.5.6Promoting conscious water usage on campus3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Campaign with water-saving signs and stickers in every faculty bathroom and a World Water Day event, with photographs and dates in 2025 or 2026. 2. Student eco-programme with a water division running awareness actions on campus, with the plan and a dated report. 3. News item on a campus-wide conscious water use campaign by the Smart Eco-Campus unit, with posters and who took part. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the on-campus water promotion, the message, where it ran, and dates in 2025 or 2026, ideally with photographs. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Active promotion of conscious water usage on campus | Done | In the narration, section 6.5.6.1, 3 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 12 Tahun 2026 tentang…, 2026-04-14) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Campaign materials dated 2025 or 2026 that tell students and staff to save water: signage in toilets, taps and refill points, posters, a World Water Day (22 March) event. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Photographs with dates of the FISIPOL biopori planting and of the bosem monitoring. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
6.5.7Promoting conscious water usage in the wider community3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Community service event teaching households to save water, with place, date and attendance in 2025 or 2026. 2. School visit programme on water-saving habits run by students, with schools named and dates. 3. Public social media or webinar campaign on conscious water use for World Water Day, with reach figures and the date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the community water-use promotion, who it reached, where, and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Active promotion of conscious water usage in the wider community | Done | In the narration, section 6.5.7.1, 3 sources (first: Kolaborasi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Surabaya dan Yayasan Menabung Air…, 2025-12-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Number of pupils and teachers reached at SDN 1 Karah and SMAN 22 and whether the sessions were free; the memorandum of understanding between FISIPOL and the Menabung Air Foundation (number and date). Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- A wider community audience (neighbourhood, parents, villagers), if any activity reached it in 2025 or 2026. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
SDG 7 · Affordable and Clean EnergyNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~19.9 of 46 points secured · quantitative 27 · THE-computed research 275 full points6 evidence missing7.1 Research on clean energy 27 points · computed by THE from publications
7.2 University measures towards affordable and clean energy 23 points
7.2.1Energy-efficient renovation and building0 / 4worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or Surat Keputusan Rektor requiring all renovations and new buildings to follow an energy efficiency standard (LEED, a green-building standard, or the national regulation on energy-efficient buildings), showing its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Campus building design standard or master-plan guideline of the infrastructure unit requiring efficient lighting, natural ventilation and efficient air conditioning in every new build and renovation, with the standard named and the date. 3. Public page citing the government guideline UNESA follows for energy-efficient buildings, with the link to the government website and the UNESA document applying it to renovations and new builds. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public unesa.ac.id or JDIH page stating the policy's title, issuer, the energy efficiency standard it requires for renovations and new builds, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on energy efficiency standards for renovations and new builds | Needs data | Request 1 below: UNESA's written policy (Peraturan Rektor, Surat Keputusan Rektor or a campus building design guideline) requiring… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 3 below: The policy's year of issue or last review, which must fall in 2022 to 2026 and be in force in 2025. |
What is still needed
- UNESA's written policy (Peraturan Rektor, Surat Keputusan Rektor or a campus building design guideline) requiring renovations and new buildings to follow an energy efficiency or green-building standard (for example LEED, Greenship, or the national regulation on green buildings), with its number, issue or review date (2022 to 2026) and a public link. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- If UNESA follows a government guideline for energy-efficient buildings, the UNESA document that applies it to renovations and new builds, with the link to the government source. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- The policy's year of issue or last review, which must fall in 2022 to 2026 and be in force in 2025. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
7.2.2Upgrade buildings to higher energy efficiency3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the plans in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Campus master plan or annual work plan listing existing buildings to be retrofitted to higher energy efficiency (LED lighting, efficient air conditioning, solar panels, insulation), with buildings, budget and timeline. 2. Programme document or news report of an energy-efficiency retrofit of named UNESA buildings in 2025 or 2026, stating what was upgraded and the further buildings planned. 3. Smart Eco-Campus or infrastructure unit roadmap for upgrading the energy performance of existing faculty buildings, dated 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the plan or programme, the existing buildings it covers, the energy-efficiency upgrades planned or done, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Plans to upgrade existing buildings to higher energy efficiency | Done | In the narration, section 7.2.2.1, 6 sources (first: Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Program, 2023-08-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The building-level upgrade plan: the list of existing buildings to be retrofitted (lighting, air conditioning, solar panels, insulation), with budget and timeline. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Which rooms and buildings received sensor-based automatic lighting, and the installation date. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Date and capacity of any solar panel additions since the 2022 report. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- D1, D3, D4 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
7.2.3Carbon reduction and emission reduction process3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the process in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Carbon footprint measurement or carbon management procedure of the Smart Eco-Campus unit, stating scope, method and the 2025 or 2026 reporting period. 2. Emissions-reduction roadmap or net-zero campus programme with reduction measures (solar power, efficient transport, paperless offices) and responsible unit. 3. Public sustainability or UI GreenMetric climate-change section describing UNESA's carbon-reduction process, with figures or actions dated 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the carbon management and emission reduction process, who runs it, what it measures or reduces, and its 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Process for carbon management and reducing carbon dioxide emissions | Done | In the narration, section 7.2.3.1, 6 sources (first: Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Program, 2023-08-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A dated carbon footprint inventory for 2025 (and 2026 if available): kWh used, emission factor, vehicle counts and the resulting tons of CO2. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The emission reduction roadmap or progress report that tracks the 50% by 2030 target (baseline year and yearly results). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1, D2 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
7.2.4Plan to reduce energy consumption3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the plan in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Surat Edaran Rektor on energy saving (air-conditioning set points, lighting and equipment switch-off, working-pattern adjustment, digitalised activities), stating the date and units covered. 2. Energy efficiency plan or action plan of the Smart Eco-Campus unit with consumption-reduction targets and measures, dated 2025 or 2026. 3. Public news or policy page on UNESA's university-wide energy-saving programme, with its measures, targets and the 2025 or 2026 period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the energy efficiency plan, the measures and targets that reduce overall energy consumption, the units it covers, and its date (2025 or 2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Energy efficiency plan to reduce overall energy consumption | Done | In the narration, section 7.2.4.1, 5 sources (first: Surat Edaran Nomor B/44908/UN38.II/HK.01.01/2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pola Kerja…, 2026-04-06) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- UNESA's overall electricity and fuel consumption baseline and any monitoring report that shows the effect of the April 2026 circular (kWh per month before and after). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Confirmation that Circular Letter B/44908/UN38.II/HK.01.01/2026 is published on UNESA's public document register (JDIH) or another public page. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- D2, D3 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
7.2.5Energy wastage identification3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the reviews in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Energy audit report of a UNESA building or the whole campus, stating who audited it, the method, where energy waste is highest, and the 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Records of an energy review (electricity metering by building, lighting and air-conditioning survey) that rank buildings or systems by energy use and identify waste. 3. News report of an energy-efficiency audit of a named UNESA building with an energy consultancy, stating the findings and recommendations. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing an energy review or audit of UNESA's own buildings, who carried it out, what it found about where energy waste is highest, and its 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Energy reviews that identify where energy waste is highest | Done | In the narration, section 7.2.5.1, 1 source (first: Mahasiswa Teknik Mesin UNESA Implementasikan Kegiatan Berdampak melalui Audit…, 2026-06-05) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The Building A6 audit report: the calculated IKE value, the measured consumption by system, and the ranked list of where waste is highest. Ask: Faculty of Engineering (FT)
- Any campus-wide or multi-building energy audit or monthly energy monitoring review carried out by the university itself (Direktorat Smart Eco Campus or Direktorat Aset). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
7.2.6Divestment policy0 / 4worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or Surat Keputusan on UNESA's investments excluding or divesting from carbon-intensive energy industries (coal, oil), with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Investment or endowment policy of the university stating that funds will not be placed in coal or oil companies, with the date and the governing body. 3. Public statement by the Rector or university board committing to divest from coal and oil holdings, with the policy document and its date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the divestment policy's title, issuer, the carbon-intensive industries (coal, oil) it excludes, how it applies to UNESA's investments, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on divesting from carbon-intensive energy industries (coal and oil) | Needs data | Request 1 below: UNESA's policy on divesting from, or excluding investment in, carbon-intensive energy industries (coal and oil), with… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- UNESA's policy on divesting from, or excluding investment in, carbon-intensive energy industries (coal and oil), with title, number, issuing body and date (2022 to 2026), and a public link. Ask: Direktorat Keuangan (finance)
- The rule that governs how UNESA invests or places its funds (endowment, deposits, government securities), and whether it names any energy-industry exclusion. Ask: Direktorat Keuangan (finance)
7.3 Energy use density 17 points
7.3.1Energy usage per sqmworth 17 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
7.4 Energy and the community 23 points
7.4.1Local community outreach for energy efficiency3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the programmes in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Community-service programme in which UNESA lecturers and students teach villagers or schools about saving energy and using solar power, with dates in 2025 or 2026, place and participants. 2. Energy-literacy workshop series for local residents or teachers on clean energy and electricity saving, run by a faculty or LPPM, with dates and attendance. 3. Awareness campaign for the surrounding community on renewable energy and energy-efficient appliances, with the sessions held and the audience reached. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the programmes for the local community on energy efficiency and clean energy, who delivered them, where, for whom, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Programmes for the local community on energy efficiency and clean energy | Done | In the narration, section 7.4.1.1, 2 sources (first: Pelatihan Penggunaan dan Pemeliharaan Pembangkit Tenaga Surya pada Desa Began…, 2025-12-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The date and venue of the Began Village training, the number of participants, whether it was free, and the funding scheme (internal community service grant or other). Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- A list of other 2025 and 2026 UNESA community programmes on energy saving or clean energy (village, school or small-business sessions), with dates and audiences. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
7.4.2100% renewable energy pledge0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the promotion in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Event or discussion in which UNESA promotes a public 100% renewable energy pledge or net-zero commitment to government, industry and the public, with date and participants. 2. Petition, signed declaration or joint statement on 100% renewable energy that UNESA gathers or promotes beyond the campus, with the date and partners. 3. Meetings between UNESA and regional government or energy-sector leaders to advance a renewable energy commitment, with agenda, date and outcome. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the 100% renewable energy pledge, UNESA's advocacy for it (petitions, meetings, events or discussions) beyond the university, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Promotion of a public pledge toward 100% renewable energy beyond the university | Needs data | Request 1 below: A public pledge toward 100% renewable energy that UNESA promotes beyond its own campus (a regional or national… |
What is still needed
- A public pledge toward 100% renewable energy that UNESA promotes beyond its own campus (a regional or national commitment, a net-zero declaration, an international campaign), and the advocacy for it: petitions gathered, meetings with relevant people, events and discussions held, with 2025 or 2026 dates and the outside audience. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
7.4.3Energy efficiency services for industry0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Ervices - maximum one point for both options free and paid, one point for free services only, 0.25 points for paid for services only Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free community-service or partnership assistance in which UNESA staff assess a local firm's energy use or run an energy-efficiency workshop for local industry, with firm, date and content. 2. Paid contract or consultancy for a local company covering an energy-efficiency assessment or renewable energy options, with the client and the 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Workshop or research collaboration with local industry on solar, biomass or other renewable options, stating whether it was free or paid. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing direct energy-efficiency or clean-energy services to local industry, the firms served, whether each was free or paid, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free services to local industry | Needs data | Request 2 below: Evidence for each option claimed: at least one free service and, separately, one paid service, each with the same kind… |
| Paid services to local industry | Needs data | Request 2 below: Evidence for each option claimed: at least one free service and, separately, one paid service, each with the same kind… |
What is still needed
- A direct service from UNESA to local industry on energy efficiency or clean energy (energy efficiency assessment, workshop, renewable-energy research for a firm), with the firm's name, the date in 2025 or 2026, and whether it was free or paid. Free services carry the larger share of the existence point. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Evidence for each option claimed: at least one free service and, separately, one paid service, each with the same kind of proof. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
7.4.4Policy development for clean energy technology0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Upport - 0.25 points for each of local, regional, national and global cooperation" (so the existence component reaches 1 only with all four levels Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. UNESA experts advising a city or regency government on an energy-saving or renewable energy plan (local), with date and the policy document supported. 2. UNESA input to a provincial energy plan or regional clean energy forum (regional), with the government body and the date. 3. UNESA contribution to a ministry working group, policy brief or national consultation on clean energy technology (national), and to an international body or global initiative (global), with dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming each instance of UNESA informing or supporting government clean energy or energy-efficient technology policy, the level (local, regional, national, global), and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local government support | Needs data | Request 1 below: Local government: an instance in 2025 or 2026 in which UNESA informed or supported a city or regency government on… |
| Regional government support | Needs data | Request 2 below: Regional government: an instance with the East Java provincial government or its agencies (for example the energy and… |
| National government support | Needs data | Request 3 below: National government: an instance with a ministry, national council or agency (for example the Ministry of Energy and… |
| Global cooperation | Needs data | Request 4 below: Global cooperation: an instance with an international body in which UNESA supported clean energy policy development. |
What is still needed
- Local government: an instance in 2025 or 2026 in which UNESA informed or supported a city or regency government on clean energy or energy-efficient technology policy. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Regional government: an instance with the East Java provincial government or its agencies (for example the energy and mineral resources office or the research agency BRIDA). Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- National government: an instance with a ministry, national council or agency (for example the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources), in which UNESA gave input such as a policy brief, working group role or expert advice. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Global cooperation: an instance with an international body in which UNESA supported clean energy policy development. Ask: International Office (Kantor Urusan Internasional)
7.4.5Assistance to low-carbon innovation0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the assistance in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Business incubator programme of UNESA mentoring and funding a start-up in renewable energy, energy storage or waste-to-energy, with the start-up, support given and dates. 2. Competition or accelerator with follow-up support for low-carbon student start-ups (solar products, electric mobility, carbon accounting), with the support provided in 2025 or 2026. 3. Partnership with a technology park or investor to take a UNESA low-carbon innovation to market, stating the university's assistance. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the assistance UNESA gives to low-carbon start-ups, the start-ups and their low-carbon product or business, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Assistance to start-ups in the low-carbon economy or technology | Needs data | Request 1 below: Assistance by UNESA (incubation, mentoring, funding, pitching support) to a start-up whose product or business is… |
What is still needed
- Assistance by UNESA (incubation, mentoring, funding, pitching support) to a start-up whose product or business is low-carbon (renewable energy, energy storage, waste-to-energy, electric mobility, carbon accounting), naming the start-up, what UNESA provided and the date in 2025 or 2026. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
7.5 Low-carbon energy use 10 points
7.5.1Low-carbon energy useworth 10 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
SDG 8 · Decent Work and Economic GrowthEvidence indicators: ~7.4 of 19.6 points secured · quantitative 53.4 · THE-computed research 273 full points6 evidence missing8.1 Research on economic growth and employment 27 points · computed by THE from publications
8.2 Employment practice 19.6 points
8.2.1Employment practice living wage3 / 3worth 2.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's Decree setting the minimum monthly pay for all staff, including non-civil-servant and outsourced workers, at or above the regional minimum wage, with its 2025 or 2026 year. 2. A remuneration regulation stating that lecturers, education staff and contract workers receive at least a named wage floor, plus THR and 13th-month pay, for 2025 or 2026. 3. A public HR page stating the wage floor paid to all staff categories, including security and cleaning staff, and how it is benchmarked against the regional minimum wage. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the wage floor UNESA pays, that it applies to permanent, contract and outsourced staff, and the year it is in force. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Pays all staff and faculty at least the living wage (the wage floor used and how it is set or benchmarked) | Needs data | Request 2 below: The pay clause for outsourced workers (cleaning, security, catering) in UNESA's service contracts, showing they receive… |
| Applies to all staff and faculty categories (permanent, contract, outsourced) | Needs data | Request 1 below: The lowest total monthly pay (basic salary, meal allowance and SAKU remuneration together) for each staff category in… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The lowest total monthly pay (basic salary, meal allowance and SAKU remuneration together) for each staff category in 2025 and 2026: permanent lecturers, permanent education staff, fixed-term (TKTT) staff and outsourced workers, compared with the Surabaya minimum wage (UMK 2025 Rp 4,961,753; 2026 Rp 5,288,796, from news reports, to be checked against the Governor's decree), or a UNESA statement that no employee is paid below it. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The pay clause for outsourced workers (cleaning, security, catering) in UNESA's service contracts, showing they receive at least the Surabaya minimum wage. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- The current (2025 or 2026) Rector's Decree setting salary amounts under Article 61 of Peraturan Rektor 37/2024, if one replaces Keputusan Rektor 960/2023. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
8.2.2Employment practice unions0 / 3worth 1.2 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.2 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's Decree or staff regulation stating that employees may join unions or staff associations and bargain collectively, open to women and international staff, with the date. 2. A public page naming a recognized staff organisation, such as a lecturers' association or Dharma Wanita, its role in representation and welfare, and that all staff may join. 3. A news post from 2025 or 2026 describing a meeting between university leaders and a staff association on welfare or working conditions, naming the body. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the recognized union or staff association, what it does, and explicitly stating that women and international staff may join. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Recognizes staff unions or associations (freedom of association and collective bargaining) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether UNESA recognises a staff union, employee association, or KORPRI unit with a freedom-of-association or… |
| Open to all staff, including women and international staff | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether that body's own rules state that women and international or foreign staff are eligible members, with the text… |
What is still needed
- Whether UNESA recognises a staff union, employee association, or KORPRI unit with a freedom-of-association or collective-bargaining function (representation, negotiation, or welfare advocacy on employees' behalf), and, if so, its founding or recognition decree and date. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- Whether that body's own rules state that women and international or foreign staff are eligible members, with the text of that provision. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- Peraturan Rektor Number 42 of 2026 on the appointment and dismissal of foreign lecturers and staff (listed on JDIH, 3 August 2026, in force; title only, not yet read): whether it gives foreign staff the same rights as other staff, including joining staff bodies. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- Whether UNESA adopts, in its own rules, the right of lecturers to join professional organisations that Law 14/2005 on Teachers and Lecturers gives them (Article 51(1)g), and extends it to education staff. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
8.2.3Employment policy on discrimination4 / 4worth 2.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor on staff conduct that prohibits discrimination by religion, gender, sexuality, age, disability and refugee status in employment, showing its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A Surat Keputusan Rektor on an equal-opportunity workplace stating that recruitment, promotion and pay are free of discrimination, with its issue date and clause numbers. 3. A public staff code of ethics, reviewed 2022-2026, naming the protected grounds and stating it covers all UNESA employment activities. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy title, its issue or review date (2022-2026), and the clause listing the prohibited grounds of workplace discrimination. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Prohibits workplace discrimination on the grounds THE names (religion, sexuality, gender, age, refugee status) and the wider grounds in THE's guidance (race, colour, national origin, disability, marital status, military status) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether any current UNESA policy separately names sexual orientation and refugee status among the protected grounds.… |
| Applies to all UNESA employment activities and operations | Done | In the narration, section 8.2.3.2, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 37 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-11-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether any current UNESA policy separately names sexual orientation and refugee status among the protected grounds. Peraturan Rektor 37/2024 and 11/2024, cited above, name religion, race, sex, age, marital status and other grounds, but not these two. Peraturan Rektor 9/2025 (Kode Etik Dosen dan Tenaga Kependidikan) and 29/2025 (Penegakan Disiplin dan Etika Pegawai) have now been read in full and confirmed not to name any discrimination ground at all, so this gap is not resolved by the two newly obtained regulations. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
8.2.4Employment policy modern slavery0 / 4worth 2.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor or ethics code stating UNESA prohibits forced labour, human trafficking and child labour in its employment, with an issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A Surat Edaran on employment practice committing against modern slavery, naming forced labour and child labour, with its date and clause. 3. A procurement or outsourcing policy, dated 2022-2026, that bans forced and child labour among contractors working on campus. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the policy title, its issue or review date (2022-2026), and the clause naming forced labour, trafficking or child labour as prohibited. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment against forced labour and modern slavery | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether UNESA has any policy, code of ethics, or procurement/supplier rule that names forced labour, modern slavery… |
| Commitment against human trafficking and child labour | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether UNESA has any policy, code of ethics, or procurement/supplier rule that names forced labour, modern slavery… |
What is still needed
- Whether UNESA has any policy, code of ethics, or procurement/supplier rule that names forced labour, modern slavery, human trafficking or child labour, in its own employment practice or in contracts with outsourced service providers, with its number and date. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
8.2.5Employment practice equivalent rights outsourcing0 / 4worth 2.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's Decree on outsourced workers (cleaning, security, catering) guaranteeing equal pay, safety and working hours with directly employed staff, showing its issue date. 2. A contract template or SOP requiring service vendors to pay the legal minimum wage, enrol workers in BPJS and give leave, with the date it took effect. 3. A public HR page stating how many outsourced workers are covered, which roles, and the rights guaranteed, dated 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the rule on outsourced workers, the roles covered, the rights guaranteed equal to employees, and its issue or review date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy guarantees equivalent rights for outsourced workers | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether UNESA's service contracts with outsourcing vendors (cleaning, security/satpam, catering) include a clause… |
| Names which outsourced activities or roles are covered (for example cleaning, security, catering) | Needs data | Request 3 below: A headcount of outsourced staff by role (cleaning, security, catering), if UNESA wants to state the scale covered. |
What is still needed
- Whether UNESA's service contracts with outsourcing vendors (cleaning, security/satpam, catering) include a clause guaranteeing workers' rights (pay, safety, working hours or similar protections) equivalent to directly employed staff, and the contract's number and date. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Whether any UNESA regulation issued or reviewed since 2022 covers third-party outsourced workers (rather than UNESA's own directly hired Tenaga Kontrak under Peraturan Rektor 124/2017, which has no review date). Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- A headcount of outsourced staff by role (cleaning, security, catering), if UNESA wants to state the scale covered. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
8.2.6Employment policy pay scale equity0 / 4worth 2.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor on remuneration stating equal pay for work of equal value regardless of gender, with a commitment to check pay gaps, showing its date (2022-2026). 2. A Surat Keputusan Rektor committing HR to review pay by gender yearly and correct any unexplained gaps, with issue date and clause numbers. 3. A gender equality policy, reviewed 2022-2026, containing a clause on measuring and eliminating gender pay gaps among lecturers and education staff. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the pay equity policy, its date (2022-2026), and the clause committing UNESA to measure and eliminate gender pay gaps. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment to measuring gender pay gaps | Needs data | Request 1 below: A written commitment, in a regulation, decree, or SDM policy, to measure and/or eliminate a gender pay gap at UNESA, or… |
| Commitment to eliminating gender pay gaps | Needs data | Request 1 below: A written commitment, in a regulation, decree, or SDM policy, to measure and/or eliminate a gender pay gap at UNESA, or… |
What is still needed
- A written commitment, in a regulation, decree, or SDM policy, to measure and/or eliminate a gender pay gap at UNESA, or a gender-disaggregated pay-scale comparison that shows one has been done. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
8.2.7Tracking pay scale for gender equity0 / 3worth 2.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. An annual HR report, 2025 or 2026, comparing average pay of women and men by rank and grade, naming the unit that prepared it and the findings. 2. A gender equality centre or HR memo showing a pay gap analysis by gender for lecturers and staff, with the method, date and follow-up actions. 3. A public news post describing a 2025 or 2026 review of remuneration by gender, who carried it out and how the results were used. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing UNESA actually compared pay by gender, how it was done, which unit did it, how often, and what was decided. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Measures or tracks pay by gender (method, unit responsible, what is compared) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Evidence that UNESA has ever measured or tracked pay by gender: the method used (for example by rank, allowance, or… |
| Frequency and use of the tracking (how often, and what is done with the findings) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Evidence that UNESA has ever measured or tracked pay by gender: the method used (for example by rank, allowance, or… |
What is still needed
- Evidence that UNESA has ever measured or tracked pay by gender: the method used (for example by rank, allowance, or total remuneration), who ran it, how often, and any findings. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
8.2.8Employment practice appeal process3 / 3worth 2.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor or SOP describing how a lecturer or staff member can file an objection to a pay decision or performance appraisal, with deadlines and who decides. 2. A public grievance procedure page for employees to appeal on rights such as leave or promotion, stating the channel, steps and response time. 3. A published staff appeal flowchart from the HR unit covering objections to performance appraisal results, in use in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the appeal steps, who may use them, the unit handling cases, and that they cover employee rights and pay or appraisal decisions. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Appeal process for employee rights | Done | In the narration, section 8.2.8.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 29 Tahun 2025 tentang…, 2025-11-10) |
| Appeal process for pay determination and/or appraisal reviews | Done | In the narration, section 8.2.8.2, 3 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 29 Tahun 2025 tentang…, 2025-11-10) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026-dated instance of the SAKU (performance-incentive) complaint window, for a payment period such as 2025.1, 2025.2 or 2026.1, to confirm this pay-determination-specific channel is still open in the current cycle. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- D1 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- D1 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
8.2.9Employment practice labour rights0 / 3worth 1.2 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.2 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Rector's Decree or staff regulation recognising the right of all employees to form or join associations and bargain collectively, including women and international staff, with date. 2. A public list of professional and subject associations that UNESA staff may join, with a statement that membership is open to all staff. 3. A news post from 2025 or 2026 on a staff association consulting leadership on working conditions, naming the association and open membership. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating that UNESA recognises freedom of association and collective bargaining for all staff, including women and international staff, and the body concerned. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Recognizes freedom of association and collective bargaining | Needs data | Request 1 below: Formal recognition of an employee body, such as a union, association, or bipartite forum, that performs collective… |
| Open to all staff, including women and international staff | Needs data | Request 1 below: Formal recognition of an employee body, such as a union, association, or bipartite forum, that performs collective… |
What is still needed
- Formal recognition of an employee body, such as a union, association, or bipartite forum, that performs collective bargaining or represents staff in negotiation with the university, together with its rules on whether women and international staff are members or eligible. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- Peraturan Rektor Number 42 of 2026 on the appointment and dismissal of foreign lecturers and staff (listed on JDIH, 3 August 2026, in force; title only, not yet read): whether it gives foreign staff the same rights as other staff, including joining staff bodies. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
8.3 Expenditure per employee 15.4 points
8.3.1Expenditure per employeeworth 15.4 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
8.4 Proportion of students taking work placements 19 points
8.4.1Proportion of students with work placementsworth 19 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
8.5 Proportion of employees on secure contracts 19 points
8.5.1Proportion of employees on secure contractsworth 19 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
SDG 9 · Industry, Innovation and InfrastructureNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~0 of 0 points secured · quantitative 73 · THE-computed research 279.1 Research on industry, innovation and infrastructure 11.6 points · computed by THE from publications
9.2 Patents citing university research 15.4 points · computed by THE from publications
9.3 University spin-offs 34.6 points
9.3.1Number of university spin offsworth 34.6 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
9.4 Research income from industry and commerce 38.4 points
9.4.1Research income from industry and commerce per academic staffworth 38.4 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
SDG 10 · Reduced InequalitiesEvidence indicators: ~17.1 of 19 points secured · quantitative 54 · THE-computed research 2710 full points1 evidence missing10.1 Research on reduced inequalities 27 points · computed by THE from publications
10.2 First-generation students 15.5 points
10.2.1Proportion of first-generation studentsworth 15.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
10.3 International students from developing countries 15.5 points
10.3.1Proportion of international students from developing countriesworth 15.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
10.4 Proportion of students with disabilities 11.5 points
10.4.1Proportion of students with disabilitiesworth 11.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
10.5 Proportion of employees with disabilities 11.5 points
10.5.1Proportion of employees with disabilitiesworth 11.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
10.6 Measures against discrimination 19 points
10.6.1Non-discriminatory admissions policy4 / 4worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor on student admissions stating that selection does not discriminate by religion, gender, ethnicity or disability, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A Keputusan Rektor opening an affirmative admissions track for disabled or low-income applicants, explaining why, with the date and clause numbers. 3. A public admissions guideline page, reviewed 2022-2026, stating non-discrimination and describing any special route and its purpose. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the admissions policy title, its issue or review date (2022-2026), and the clause on non-discrimination or the positive discrimination route. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a non-discriminatory admissions policy, or one that explains its positive-discrimination logic | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.1.1, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-28) |
| The policy's date (created or reviewed 2022-2026) and that it is still in force | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.1.2, 6 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether the 2024 disability track fee exemption (UKT and SPI waiver) still applied to the 2025 and 2026 cohorts; no 2025 or 2026 source states the fee terms directly Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- A full, non-SSO-gated public copy of Rector's Regulation Number 14 of 2024; only a JDIH public preview link was found, and a complete download currently requires UNESA single sign-on Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
10.6.2Access to university track underrepresented groups applications3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the measures in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A 2025 or 2026 admissions report giving numbers of applicants and admitted students from a disability, low-income or other underrepresented track, with the unit responsible. 2. A public page of KIP-Kuliah or affirmative-track statistics showing applicants and admitted students by group for 2025 or 2026. 3. A news post describing how the admissions unit records applications from disabled and 3T-region applicants, including the figures for the year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing recorded applicant and admitted numbers for an underrepresented group in 2025 or 2026, and which unit tracks them. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a system that measures and tracks applications/admissions of one or more underrepresented groups | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.2.1, 1 source (first: Unesa Terima 8.292 Camaba Jalur SNBT, Prodi Kesehatan dan Vokasi Puncaki Daftar…, 2026-05-25) |
| Evidence of the tracking in use (published figures, a dedicated admissions route with recorded numbers) | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.2.2, 1 source (first: Unesa Terima 8.292 Camaba Jalur SNBT, Prodi Kesehatan dan Vokasi Puncaki Daftar…, 2026-05-25) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A published applicant or admission count broken down specifically for the jalur disabilitas and jalur afirmasi independent selection tracks, not only the SNBT national test route, for 2025 and 2026 Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- Tracked figures for other underrepresented groups named by THE (ethnic minority, women, LGBT students, newly settled refugee students, non-traditional students) Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- The equivalent 2025 breakdown (this plan cites only the 2026 SNBT breakdown); confirm whether a 2025 figure was published Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
10.6.3Access to university underrepresented groups recruit3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the planned actions in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A 2025 or 2026 programme to recruit students from remote regions, low-income families or disabled applicants, naming the target group, the running unit and the date. 2. A staff recruitment announcement from 2025 or 2026 inviting applicants with disabilities or from underrepresented groups, with the quota or measure. 3. A news post on outreach visits to schools in underrepresented areas to recruit students, with dates, places and participant numbers. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing a planned recruitment action for students, staff or faculty from an underrepresented group, who ran it, and when in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Planned action to recruit students from underrepresented groups | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.3.1, 6 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-28) |
| Planned action to recruit staff or faculty from underrepresented groups | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.3.1, 6 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 14 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A stated planned action or measure to recruit staff or faculty from underrepresented groups, for example a disability employment quota consistent with Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities, or a targeted hiring measure, with a 2025 or 2026 date. The August 2025 lecturer and education staff recruitment announcement carries no such provision in the text checked Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
10.6.4Anti-discrimination policies4 / 4worth 0.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 0.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor stating UNESA does not tolerate discrimination by race, gender, age, religion, disability or sexual orientation anywhere in its operations, with issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. A Keputusan Rektor on an equal treatment policy covering students, staff and services across all faculties, showing its date and clause numbers. 3. A public code of conduct, reviewed 2022-2026, naming the protected grounds and stating it applies to the whole institution. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the anti-discrimination policy title, its issue or review date (2022-2026), the protected grounds, and that it covers the whole institution. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a policy covering the institution and its operations that prevents discrimination | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.4.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| The policy's date (created or reviewed 2022-2026) and that it is still in force | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.4.2, 3 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation of whether a single, dedicated institution-wide anti-discrimination regulation exists beyond Rector's Regulation Number 11 of 2024 (violence) and Number 21 of 2023 (student code of ethics, covering students only) Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
10.6.5University diversity officer3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the committee and/or office in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Keputusan Rektor establishing an inclusion or disability service unit with the task of advising on and carrying out diversity, equity and human rights programmes. 2. A decree forming a committee on gender equality and inclusion, naming its tasks, who appointed it and its term covering 2025 or 2026. 3. A news post from 2025 or 2026 showing that the unit ran a training or programme on inclusion for staff and students. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the diversity or inclusion unit, the authority that tasked it, what it advises on or implements, and activity in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a diversity/equality committee, office or officer tasked by UNESA's administration or governing body | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.5.1, 4 sources (first: Keputusan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor UN38/HK/2025 tentang Tim…, 2025-04-17) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation of a diversity/equality office or committee that covers grounds beyond disability (gender, ethnicity, religion, LGBT, socio-economic status), for example whether UNESA's Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak is still active with a governance-level tasking, since PUID/DIC's own mandate is disability-focused. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- A public URL or announcement page for Keputusan Rektor Nomor UN38/HK/2025 (currently an internal SK with no public copy found). Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
10.6.6Support for underrepresented groups3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the provision in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A mentoring programme from 2025 or 2026 pairing senior students or lecturers with students with disabilities or from low-income families, with dates and participant numbers. 2. A counselling service open to underrepresented students, such as KIP-Kuliah recipients, run by a named unit, with 2025 or 2026 sessions. 3. A peer support group for students with disabilities or staff from minority groups, with its schedule, facilitators and attendance. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the mentoring, counselling or peer support programme, the group it serves, the unit running it, and its 2025 or 2026 activity. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Mentoring, counselling or peer support programme for students, staff or faculty from underrepresented groups | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.6.1, 3 sources (first: Unesa Siapkan Puluhan Pendamping Menyambut Maba Disabilitas yang Menjalani…, 2025-08-17) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A mentoring, counselling or peer-support programme that reaches staff or faculty (not only students) from an underrepresented group, as THE's wording asks for all three groups. Ask: PUID (Disability Innovation Center)
10.6.7Accessible facilities3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the facilities in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A news post from 2025 or 2026 describing new ramps, guiding blocks, accessible toilets and lifts in named buildings, with the delivery date. 2. An accessibility audit report of campus buildings in 2025 or 2026, listing the accessible features present in each faculty building. 3. A public page of campus facilities showing accessible features, such as Braille signage and wheelchair routes, and which buildings have them. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the accessible facilities, the buildings or campuses they cover, and the 2025 or 2026 date of delivery or operation. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Accessible facilities provided for people with disabilities | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.7.1, 3 sources (first: DIC UNESA Petakan Aksesibilitas Kampus bersama Mahasiswa Teknik Sipil dan…, 2025-07-07) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The upgrade recommendations from the June 2026 Dr. Moestopo and Magetan campus survey (D6) had not been finalised as of the meeting reported; ask PUID or the Civil Engineering department whether ramps, tactile paving or other features were installed as a result before the submission date. Ask: PUID (Disability Innovation Center)
10.6.8Disability support services3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the services in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A disability service centre page stating that it offers note-taking, assistive technology and exam accommodations to students with disabilities, active in 2025 or 2026. 2. A news post from 2025 or 2026 on an orientation or assistance session by the disability unit for new students with disabilities, with numbers. 3. A Keputusan Rektor naming the disability support service and its tasks, together with 2025 or 2026 evidence that it is operating. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the disability support service, what it provides, who it serves, the responsible unit, and evidence it operated in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Support service(s) for people with disabilities | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.8.1, 4 sources (first: Keputusan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor UN38/HK/2025 tentang Tim…, 2025-04-17) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A public URL or announcement page for Keputusan Rektor Nomor UN38/HK/2025 (currently an internal SK with no public copy found). Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
10.6.9Disability access scheme3 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Chemes - maximum one point for both options mentoring and other targeted support, one point for mentoring only, one point for other targeted support only Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Mentoring: a scheme from 2025 or 2026 where trained peer mentors are assigned to students with disabilities, with the unit running it, dates and number of pairs. 2. Other targeted support: a dedicated admissions quota or tuition waiver for applicants with disabilities, active in 2025 or 2026, stating who qualifies. 3. Other targeted support: a job-matching or assistive technology programme for graduates with disabilities, with the unit, dates and participants. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the access scheme, stating whether it is mentoring or other targeted support, who runs it, who may use it, and its 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Mentoring | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.9.1, 1 source (first: Fakultas Psikologi UNESA Gelar Pelatihan Peer Counselor Hari Pertama, Dukung…, 2026-08-28) |
| Other targeted support | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.9.2, 2 sources (first: Jalur Mandiri Unesa 2026 Resmi Dibuka, Catat Jadwal dan Pilihan Seleksinya!, 2026-06-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The number of students with disability matched to a peer counsellor, or trained as one, in 2025 or 2026 Ask: Faculty of Psychology
- The number of applicants admitted through Jalur Disabilitas in 2025 and 2026, and whether a tuition (UKT) or admission-fee (SPI) waiver applies this cycle Ask: Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)
- A 2025 or 2026 dated usage figure or activity report for COMMADIF (konselingmadif.unesa.ac.id) or Jobdis, the standing counselling and job-matching platforms named in last year's file Ask: PUID (Disability Innovation Center)
10.6.10Disability accommodation policy0 / 3worth 1.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the accommodation in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Keputusan Rektor on reasonable accommodation for students and staff with disabilities, listing physical, academic and employment adjustments, with its year. 2. A strategy or SOP for accommodations such as extra exam time, accessible materials and adjusted workstations, naming the budget line or funding source. 3. A public policy page stating that UNESA allocates funds yearly for disability accommodations and listing what they cover, in force in 2025. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the accommodation policy or strategy, the adjustments it commits to, and the funding allocated to deliver them, in force by 2025. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a reasonable-accommodation policy or strategy for people with disabilities, including its funding | Needs data | Request 1 below: A named reasonable-accommodation policy or strategy for people with disabilities that states a funding commitment or… |
What is still needed
- A named reasonable-accommodation policy or strategy for people with disabilities that states a funding commitment or budget line (existing sources describe accommodations in the 2 October 2025 Buku Saku UNESA Inklusif guide, and name PSLPD/PUID and the Disability Innovation Center as responsible units, but no source states a funding amount or budget allocation for accommodations) Ask: Direktorat Keuangan (finance)
- Confirmation that Buku Saku UNESA Inklusif (dated Surabaya, 2 October 2025) is published at a public URL rather than only distributed as a PDF, since an uploaded document alone scores as not public Ask: PUID (Disability Innovation Center)
10.6.11Anti-harassment policy4 / 4worth 0.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 0.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor on preventing and handling violence and harassment, defining harassment and setting rules on reporting, investigation and victim protection, with issue date (2022-2026). 2. A Keputusan Rektor forming a task force on harassment with institution-wide scope, giving its date and clause numbers. 3. A public SOP on harassment complaints, reviewed 2022-2026, covering all faculties, units and operations. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the anti-harassment policy title, its issue or review date (2022-2026), the definition of harassment, and the institution-wide scope. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a policy covering the institution and its operations against harassment | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.11.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
| The policy's date (created or reviewed 2022-2026) and that it is still in force | Done | In the narration, section 10.6.11.2, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 11 Tahun 2024 tentang…, 2024-05-03) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Satgas PPKPT's 2025 or 2026 case count or its Article 36 monitoring and evaluation report to the Rector, to show the policy applied to a handled case rather than only training and outreach Ask: Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
SDG 11 · Sustainable Cities and CommunitiesEvidence indicators: ~34.4 of 57.7 points secured · quantitative 15.3 · THE-computed research 279 full points6 evidence missing11.1 Research on sustainable cities and communities 27 points · computed by THE from publications
11.2 Support of arts and heritage 22.6 points
11.2.1Public access to buildings3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A news post from 2025 or 2026 stating that a named heritage building or monument on campus is open free of charge to visitors, with the hours. 2. A public page stating that all of UNESA's significant heritage buildings can be visited free by the public, with the access rules and a 2025 or 2026 date. 3. A public page for a campus heritage landscape stating free public entry, and why the site is of cultural significance. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the building or heritage site, why it is culturally significant, that entry is free to the public, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free access to all significant buildings | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether Graha Sawunggaling, or another specific UNESA building, is formally recognised as being of cultural or historic… |
| Some free access | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.1.1, 3 sources (first: IMPROVE 2026 Hadir di UNESA, Seniman 8 Negara Bertemu di Surabaya untuk…, 2026-06-28) |
| Paid access | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Standing, year-round public visiting hours for Graha Sawunggaling, or for any other UNESA building, monument or landscape of cultural significance, beyond the multi-day IMPROVE 2026 festival. Ask: PUI Seni Budaya Majapahitan (arts and culture)
- Whether Graha Sawunggaling, or another specific UNESA building, is formally recognised as being of cultural or historic significance (a heritage designation, cagar budaya status, or a comparable official recognition), beyond its use for arts and culture events. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
11.2.2Public access to libraries3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A library page stating that any member of the public can enter and read books and journals free, without registration, with opening hours in 2025 or 2026. 2. A library visitor guideline stating that outside readers can apply for a reader card with only an ID, and may read the collection on site. 3. A news post from 2025 or 2026 on library open days or reading access for schools and local residents. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the library, what it holds, how the public gains access (automatic or after application), the conditions, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic free access to public | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.2.1, 3 sources (first: journal.unesa.ac.id (electronic journal portal), 2026-09-26) |
| Access to all after application | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether members of the public may borrow physical books, or only read them on site, and any published rate for a public… |
| Access in some circumstances | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether members of the public may borrow physical books, or only read them on site, and any published rate for a public… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether a member of the public (not a student, lecturer or staff member) may enter UNESA's central library building or a faculty reading room, and if so, whether that requires an application, a fee, or is automatic; UPT Perpustakaan's own 'Layanan' page names sivitas akademika as the audience and does not state a public-visitor rule. Ask: UPT Perpustakaan (library)
- Which UNESA unit or directorate administers journal.unesa.ac.id, for the responsible-unit statement and its review cycle. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Whether members of the public may borrow physical books, or only read them on site, and any published rate for a public library card, to test the 'access to all after application' or 'access in some circumstances' options. Ask: UPT Perpustakaan (library)
11.2.3Public access to museums0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A news post from 2025 or 2026 on a museum or gallery at a faculty that is open free to the public, with the dates and the items shown. 2. A public page for a campus museum or exhibition space listing its opening hours and stating entry is free for all visitors. 3. A news post on a 2025 or 2026 public art exhibition or traditional artefact display open to local residents, with the venue. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the museum or exhibition, whether entry is free or paid, that the public may attend, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free access to all museums and galleries | Needs data | Request 4 below: An inventory of any UNESA-operated museum, gallery, or permanent exhibition space, and whether admission to any of them… |
| Free access to some | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether the 'History House Laboratory' (Building I7, FISIP), described on the lab's Instagram as open to everyone, held… |
| Paid access | Needs data | Request 3 below: Whether the 'History House Laboratory' (Building I7, FISIP), described on the lab's Instagram as open to everyone, held… |
What is still needed
- Whether entry to Galeri Wastu Wimba, UNESA's new fine-art gallery at Building T3, Faculty of Languages and Arts (opened 18 September 2025 with the 'MACAK' exhibition), is free or ticketed, and its standing public opening hours beyond the opening-day exhibition. Ask: Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)
- Whether entry to the 'Surabaya City of Heroes' history exhibition (23-24 September 2025, Gedung I6 Srikandi, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences), which the Faculty's own report states was 'open to the public', was free or ticketed. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Whether the 'History House Laboratory' (Building I7, FISIP), described on the lab's Instagram as open to everyone, held any dated activity in 2025 or 2026, and its access terms (free/paid, hours). Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- An inventory of any UNESA-operated museum, gallery, or permanent exhibition space, and whether admission to any of them is charged. Ask: Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)
11.2.4Public access to green spaces3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A public page stating that the campus park or garden is open daily and free to local residents, with the opening hours, in force in 2025 or 2026. 2. A news post from 2025 or 2026 on a campus green space opened to the public free for a community event or fun walk. 3. A campus map page naming the open green spaces and stating that anyone, not only students and staff, may enter free. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the green space, whether public access is permanent or occasional, that it is free for the general public, and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Permanent free access | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.4.1, 1 source (first: Wajah Baru Danau Unesa: Makin Bersih dan Bebas PKL, Jadi Spot Favorit Warga, 2026-06-19) |
| Occasional free access | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.4.1, 1 source (first: Wajah Baru Danau Unesa: Makin Bersih dan Bebas PKL, Jadi Spot Favorit Warga, 2026-06-19) |
| Paid access | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Standing opening hours or a formal rule (from the university or the city) stating that public entry to the Danau UNESA lake area is free and permanent, since the RRI report describes the current cleaned, vendor-free condition and residents' hope that it continues, but names no gate, hours or written rule. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Confirmation of whether entry to the lake area, or any other campus green space, is ever charged, and whether any other named UNESA green or open space (for example a campus forest or garden) also admits the general public. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
11.2.5Arts and heritage contribution3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. More than 30 named public performances in a year by the choir, dance, theatre or gamelan groups, each listed with date, venue and group. 2. An ongoing public performance programme, such as a monthly campus arts night open to the public, whose 2025 or 2026 schedule adds up to more than 30 shows. 3. A faculty of arts season calendar for 2025 or 2026 listing more than 30 public concerts, plays and dance shows, with dates and venues. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page or table listing each public performance in 2025 or 2026 with date, group and venue, so the annual count can be checked. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| More than 30 performances a year | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.5.1, 6 sources (first: World Dance Day 2026 di UNESA: Estafet Tari Seharian Libatkan 30+ Komunitas Seni, 2026-04-30) |
| More than 15 performances a year | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.5.1, 6 sources (first: World Dance Day 2026 di UNESA: Estafet Tari Seharian Libatkan 30+ Komunitas Seni, 2026-04-30) |
| Ad-hoc performances only | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- An official annual tally or performance calendar from PUI Seni Budaya Majapahitan naming every 2026 public performance, to confirm the running total exceeds 30 beyond the World Dance Day relay and the five further events counted here Ask: PUI Seni Budaya Majapahitan (arts and culture)
- The unit's own annual log of public performances for 2025 or 2026, to confirm the count (each act is counted as a performance and the external troupes in the World Dance Day relay are left out). Ask: Unit to be identified
11.2.6Record and preserve cultural heritage3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local or regional: a 2025 or 2026 project documenting East Java folklore, Javanese language or local crafts, by a named faculty with dates and outputs. 2. National: a project recording an Indonesian tradition, such as a regional dance or batik, with a published archive or book from 2025 or 2026. 3. Displaced communities: a project recording the language or customs of a displaced or relocated community, with partners, dates and outputs. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the heritage project, what is recorded or preserved, whether it is local, national or displaced-community heritage, and the 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local or regional cultural heritage | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.6.1, 7 sources (first: Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi UNESA Dukung Digitalisasi Warisan Budaya Sidoarjo…, 2026-06-30) |
| National cultural heritage | Done | In the narration, section 11.2.6.1, 7 sources (first: Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi UNESA Dukung Digitalisasi Warisan Budaya Sidoarjo…, 2026-06-30) |
| Heritage of displaced communities | Needs data | Request 1 below: A project that records or preserves the intangible cultural heritage of displaced or refugee communities |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A project that records or preserves the intangible cultural heritage of displaced or refugee communities Ask: PUI Seni Budaya Majapahitan (arts and culture)
- Confirmation that the Ponorogo Art Council received and used the 'Reog di Panggung Media Sosial' campaign material, to move the national-tier claim beyond one student's coursework Ask: Faculty of Vocational Studies
- Whether the Ponorogo Art Council adopted or published the material beyond the university's own report. Ask: Faculty of Vocational Studies
11.3 Expenditure on arts and heritage 15.3 points
11.3.1Arts and heritage expenditureworth 15.3 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
11.4 Sustainable practices 35.1 points
11.4.1Sustainable practices targets0 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A sustainability plan stating a target such as a set percentage of staff and students commuting by bicycle, bus or shuttle by a named year, with the baseline measure. 2. A Keputusan Rektor setting a target to reduce private cars on campus and measuring the vehicle to population ratio, with the date set. 3. A green campus report, 2025 or 2026, giving the commuting mode share survey and the target for the next year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating what commuting is measured, the actual target number and date, when it was set, and which unit is responsible. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Measures and targets for sustainable commuting | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated, actual target for sustainable commuting (a numeric mode-share, vehicle-to-population ratio ceiling, or… |
What is still needed
- A dated, actual target for sustainable commuting (a numeric mode-share, vehicle-to-population ratio ceiling, or electric-fleet share, with the date the target was set), not only a measurement or a planning-meeting report. Last year's file states a vehicle-to-population ratio of 0.057 and a zero-emission fleet of 332 units, but gives no date the count was taken and no stated target, and its two population bases (66,113 and 78,146) disagree and are unresolved. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Confirmation of whether the shuttle-car procurement, campus-bicycle count, and electric golf-car plan discussed at the 4 March 2026 coordination meeting were adopted as a formal, dated target, or remain a discussion item. Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
11.4.2Promote sustainable commuting3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A 2025 or 2026 campaign encouraging staff and students to cycle, walk or use the campus shuttle, with the dates, the unit and the participants. 2. A news post on new bicycle parking, shuttle service or electric vehicle charging introduced for commuters, with the date. 3. An incentive such as a discount or reward for carpooling or public transport, run by a named unit in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the action, which sustainable mode it promotes, the unit that ran it, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Actions to promote sustainable commuting | Done | In the narration, section 11.4.2.1, 1 source (first: Berkat Kampus Hijau dan Cerdas, Strategi Lingkungan UNESA Raih Pengakuan…, 2026-09-18) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The exact date the electric-bicycle and centralised-parking facilities were introduced (only the 18 September 2026 recognition report is dated). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Confirmation of whether the shuttle-car, electric golf-car and campus-bicycle plan discussed on 4 March 2026 has been delivered. Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
- Any dedicated campaign, incentive or car-free event promoting sustainable commuting, beyond the infrastructure already cited. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
11.4.3Allow remote working3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A Peraturan Rektor or Surat Edaran allowing staff to work from home on set days each week, in force in 2025 or 2026, stating who is covered. 2. A policy on a condensed working week, such as four longer days, for education staff, with its coverage and the date it applied. 3. A public HR page describing standard remote working for lecturers on administrative or research days, with the rules and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the telecommuting, remote working or condensed week rule, which employees it covers, and how it was applied in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Telecommuting, remote working, or a condensed working week | Done | In the narration, section 11.4.3.1, 3 sources (first: Surat Edaran Nomor B/44908/UN38.II/HK.01.01/2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pola Kerja…, 2026-04-06) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that the Work From Office/Work From Home scheme in Surat Edaran B/44908/UN38.II/HK.01.01/2026 remained in force through September 2026 and into 2026-2027, since the circular itself states no end date. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
11.4.4Affordable housing for employees0 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Evaluating affordability: a 2025 or 2026 study comparing UNESA staff housing rents or loan cost with the regional median income or a housing affordability index. 2. Providing directly: a UNESA guest house or staff housing with subsidised rent for lecturers and employees, stating eligibility and price, in 2025 or 2026. 3. Financial support: a partner-bank housing loan scheme or housing allowance for employees, with the terms and the date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the employee housing or support scheme, who is eligible, the price or subsidy, whether affordability was evaluated, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluating affordability | Needs data | Request 3 below: Any affordability benchmark UNESA has used to evaluate employee housing (for example against a median-household-income… |
| Providing housing directly | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated 2025 or 2026 source confirming the current status of the UNESA, Bank BTN and PT Oma Estate housing… |
| Providing financial support | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated 2025 or 2026 source confirming the current status of the UNESA, Bank BTN and PT Oma Estate housing… |
What is still needed
- A dated 2025 or 2026 source confirming the current status of the UNESA, Bank BTN and PT Oma Estate housing collaboration for lecturers and staff (eligibility, and whether it evaluates affordability, provides housing directly, or gives financial support), since the UNESA press page announcing it could not be read. Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
- The delivery status and date of the planned guest house for Campus 5 (Magetan) lecturers in the former District Building, named in last year's file with no date. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Any affordability benchmark UNESA has used to evaluate employee housing (for example against a median-household-income standard). Ask: Direktorat SDM (human resources)
11.4.5Affordable housing for students3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Evaluating affordability: a 2025 or 2026 survey comparing dormitory fees with private boarding house prices near campus, with the results. 2. Providing directly: a UNESA dormitory or rusunawa with fees below market boarding rates, stating capacity, fee and eligible students, in 2025 or 2026. 3. Financial support: a housing allowance or fee waiver for students from low-income families who live in the dormitory, with the date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the student housing, its fee, who is eligible, whether affordability was evaluated, and what support is given, with a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluating affordability | Needs data | Request 1 below: Whether UNESA has evaluated Rusunawa's affordability against a recognised benchmark (for example the median cost of… |
| Providing housing directly | Done | In the narration, section 11.4.5.1, 2 sources (first: Pengelolaan, 2026-09-26) |
| Providing financial support | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether any scholarship, fee waiver or rent subsidy exists for student housing, which would support the 'providing… |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether UNESA has evaluated Rusunawa's affordability against a recognised benchmark (for example the median cost of private boarding houses, kos, near its campuses), which would support the 'evaluating affordability' option. Ask: Student housing (Rusunawa)
- Whether any scholarship, fee waiver or rent subsidy exists for student housing, which would support the 'providing financial support' option. Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- The current status, capacity and rate of the Eco-Container Dormitory and the Pesantren Mahasiswa (PESMA) named in last year's file, since neither could be confirmed with a 2025-2026 source. Ask: Student housing (Rusunawa)
- Whether asrama facilities for incoming Japanese exchange students, discussed as a hope after the April 2026 Japan visit, have been delivered. Ask: Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)
11.4.6Pedestrian priority on campus0 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A campus master plan or decree creating a vehicle-free zone or separated pedestrian path in a named area, in force in 2025 or 2026. 2. A news post on restricted vehicle access, pedestrian crossings and lighting in the main campus area, with the date and location. 3. A campus traffic regulation giving priority to pedestrians, limiting vehicle speed and banning parking on walkways. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the pedestrian priority measure, where on campus it applies, and the date or standing status in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Pedestrian priority on campus | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any campus master plan, traffic management rule or standing practice that gives pedestrians priority over vehicles on… |
What is still needed
- Whether the redesigned Ketintang campus main gate (completed 12 December 2025) includes a vehicle separated pedestrian path, a restricted vehicle zone, or pedestrian priority signage, with a description or photograph of the built design Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Any campus master plan, traffic management rule or standing practice that gives pedestrians priority over vehicles on campus roads and paths, with its date Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
11.4.7Local authority collaboration regarding planning and development3 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A cooperation agreement or MoU, 2025 or 2026, with the Surabaya city planning agency on a development issue, stating the topic and the parties. 2. A news post on UNESA taking part in a city or regency planning forum on housing or land use, naming the agency and the date. 3. A joint project with a local government on affordable housing access for local residents, with its dates and outputs. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the local authority, the planning or development issue, any link to affordable housing for residents, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local authority collaboration on planning and development | Done | In the narration, section 11.4.7.1, 4 sources (first: Kuliah Tamu Mata Kuliah Studio Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Dinamika…, 2025-02-25) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A joint UNESA and local authority programme or agreement that names local residents' access to affordable housing as its subject, as THE's guidance mentions Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Confirmation that the DPRKPCK Jatim guest lecture and studio visit, and the BAPPEDA Nganjuk placements, sit under a standing cooperation agreement (MoU) with these authorities, rather than one off academic events Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
11.4.8Planning development - new build standards0 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A campus building standard or decree requiring green building design, such as energy efficient lighting, natural ventilation and rainwater use, applied to buildings built by 2025. 2. A green building certificate, or a stated design target, for a named new UNESA building completed by 2025. 3. A news post on a new building built following sustainable construction practices, naming the standard and the completion year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the sustainable building standard or practice, and a specific new building or project to which it applied by 2025. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Sustainable standards for new buildings | Needs data | Request 1 below: The name of any sustainable building standard, code (for example Bangunan Gedung Hijau) or certification UNESA requires… |
What is still needed
- The name of any sustainable building standard, code (for example Bangunan Gedung Hijau) or certification UNESA requires or follows for new construction, and which building(s) it has been applied to by 2025, with dates Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Whether the RSPTN teaching hospital design (with BAPPENAS and AIIB appointed consultants) incorporates a named sustainability standard, given AIIB's own environmental and social safeguard requirements for financed projects Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
11.4.9Building on brownfield sites0 / 3worth 3.9 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.9 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. A campus development plan stating that new faculty buildings are built on previously used or already developed land, naming the site and its earlier use. 2. A news post on a new building constructed on the site of a former building or unused facility, with the completion year, by 2025. 3. A land use policy preferring reuse of underused developed campus land over new greenfield sites, dated by 2025. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the site, what stood there or how it was developed before, the new UNESA building on it, and that it was built or underway by 2025. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Building on brownfield sites | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any UNESA policy or practice stating a preference to build on brownfield sites where possible |
What is still needed
- Whether the Sekolah Rakyat site at Gedangan, Sidoarjo, or any other 2025 or planned UNESA building project, sits on land that was previously built on or developed (a former building, factory, or other developed use), with that prior use named Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
- Any UNESA policy or practice stating a preference to build on brownfield sites where possible Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
SDG 12 · Responsible Consumption and ProductionSubmission undecidedEvidence indicators: ~18.3 of 59.5 points secured · quantitative 13.5 · THE-computed research 272 full points7 evidence missing12.1 Research on responsible consumption and production 27 points · computed by THE from publications
12.2 Operational measures 26.7 points
12.2.1Ethical sourcing policy0 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on ethical procurement of food and supplies, requiring supplier worker safety, fair labour and environmental checks, showing its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Surat Keputusan Rektor on sustainable procurement with a supplier code of conduct covering fair treatment of workers and environmental impact, dated and in force in 2025 or 2026. 3. Canteen and catering sourcing guideline stating food must come from local or certified suppliers with safe, fair working conditions, with its issue or review date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public unesa.ac.id or PPID page stating the ethical sourcing policy's title, issuer, requirements on worker safety, fair treatment and environmental impact, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Ethical sourcing policy | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA procurement or supplier rule that requires ethical, environmentally or socially responsible sourcing of food… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA procurement or supplier rule that requires ethical, environmentally or socially responsible sourcing of food… |
What is still needed
- A UNESA procurement or supplier rule that requires ethical, environmentally or socially responsible sourcing of food and supplies (worker safety and fair treatment, environmental and social impact), created or reviewed 2022-2026. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
12.2.3Policy waste disposal - hazardous materials0 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on hazardous and toxic waste (B3) management, defining chemical, biological and radiological waste and how it is stored and disposed, with issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Laboratory SOP for chemical and biological waste segregation, labelling, storage and pickup by a licensed hauler, dated 2022-2026 and applied in faculties. 3. Public page of the Smart Eco-Campus unit describing hazardous waste handling practice, the units covered, the licensed hauler contract and the 2025 or 2026 period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the policy, process or practice on hazardous waste disposal, what counts as hazardous (chemical, biological, radiological), how disposal works, who runs it, and its date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy, process or practice on hazardous-waste disposal | Needs data | Request 1 below: A named UNESA policy, process or practice (written SOP, Peraturan Rektor, or K3/laboratory directive) on… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A named UNESA policy, process or practice (written SOP, Peraturan Rektor, or K3/laboratory directive) on… |
What is still needed
- A named UNESA policy, process or practice (written SOP, Peraturan Rektor, or K3/laboratory directive) on hazardous-material (biological, chemical, radiological or physical) waste disposal, dated or reviewed 2022-2026, with a public URL. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
12.2.4Policy waste disposal - landfill policy4 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on campus waste management requiring monthly measurement of waste sent to landfill and waste recycled, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Surat Edaran Rektor instructing faculties and units to record waste weights by category (landfill, recycled, composted) and report them to the Smart Eco-Campus unit each year. 3. SOP for the campus waste station (TPS3R) logging tonnes of waste sent to landfill and recycled, with its approval date and the responsible unit. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy title, issuer, the requirement to measure waste sent to landfill and waste recycled, who measures it, and the policy's issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on measuring waste sent to landfill and recycled | Done | In the narration, section 12.2.4.1, 4 sources (first: Standar Operasional Prosedur Direktorat Smart Sustainability Campus (USSC)…, 2026-07-01) |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Done | In the narration, section 12.2.4.2, 1 source (first: Standar Operasional Prosedur Direktorat Smart Sustainability Campus (USSC)…, 2026-07-01) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The text of 'SOP Penerimaan dan Pemilahan Sampah di TPS 3R' (or another named USSC document) requiring the amount of residual waste sent to landfill to be measured and reported, to close the landfill half of this indicator. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
12.2.5Policy for minimisation of plastic use0 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor banning single-use plastic bottles, bags and wrapping in canteens, offices and events, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Surat Edaran Rektor requiring tumblers and reusable bags at campus meetings and student events, stating the date it takes effect and the units covered. 3. Campus programme with a reduction target for plastic use, such as a plastic-free canteen scheme, with start date, units involved and monitoring method. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the plastic minimisation policy's title, issuer, what plastic items are restricted or targeted, where it applies on campus, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on plastic-use minimisation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular (Peraturan Rektor, SK, or surat edaran), created or reviewed in… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular (Peraturan Rektor, SK, or surat edaran), created or reviewed in… |
What is still needed
- A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular (Peraturan Rektor, SK, or surat edaran), created or reviewed in 2022-2026, that states a rule minimising plastic use (for example a single-use-plastic restriction, a bottled-water or tumbler mandate, or a plastic ban in canteens/events), with its title, number, date, and the relevant clause. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
12.2.6Policy for minimisation of disposable items0 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on minimising single-use items such as styrofoam, plastic cutlery and disposable cups, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Surat Edaran Rektor requiring reusable plates, cups and cutlery at campus events and canteens, with the effective date and who must comply. 3. Zero-waste event guideline of the Smart Eco-Campus unit listing banned disposable items and reusable alternatives, with issue date and units covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the disposable items policy's title, issuer, which single-use items it targets (styrofoam, cutlery, packaging), where it applies, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on disposable/single-use item minimisation | Needs data | Request 1 below: A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular, created or reviewed in 2022-2026, that states a rule minimising… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular, created or reviewed in 2022-2026, that states a rule minimising… |
What is still needed
- A public UNESA policy, regulation, or circular, created or reviewed in 2022-2026, that states a rule minimising disposable/single-use items (for example styrofoam, plastic cutlery, or single-use packaging in canteens or events), with its title, number, date, and the relevant clause. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
12.2.7Disposable policy: extensions to services0 / 3worth 1.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the extension in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Clause in the campus waste or plastic policy requiring canteen tenants and caterers to avoid single-use plastics and styrofoam, stated in the policy text. 2. Standard canteen tenancy or catering contract term obliging the contractor to use reusable or recyclable packaging and sort waste, with the contract template available. 3. Cleaning and security service contract term requiring waste sorting and use of the campus waste system, with the clause quoted and the 2025 or 2026 contract year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page quoting the clause or contract term extending the waste, plastic or disposable policies to outsourced campus services such as canteens, cleaning and security, with the year. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Extension of the 12.2.x policies to outsourced services and the supply chain | Needs data | Request 1 below: Evidence that a 12.2.x waste/disposable-minimisation or ethical-sourcing policy extends, by clause or by contract… |
What is still needed
- Evidence that a 12.2.x waste/disposable-minimisation or ethical-sourcing policy extends, by clause or by contract terms, to outsourced services on campus (canteen/catering tenants, cleaning contractors, security guards), and how. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
12.2.8Minimisation policies extended to suppliers0 / 3worth 1.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 1.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the extension in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Procurement guideline requiring suppliers of equipment and stationery to meet environmental criteria such as recycled content, minimal packaging and no single-use plastic. 2. Supplier code of conduct annexed to purchasing and building contracts, requiring waste reduction and ethical sourcing, with the clause quoted and year in force. 3. Tender document or Surat Keputusan for building works requiring contractors to manage construction waste and avoid disposable materials, with the clause and 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page quoting the procurement or supplier clause that extends UNESA's waste, plastic or sourcing policies to suppliers of equipment, stationery or building contracts, with the year it applies. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Extension of the 12.2.x policies to outsourced suppliers and the supply chain | Needs data | Request 1 below: Evidence that a 12.2.x waste/disposable-minimisation or ethical-sourcing policy extends, by procurement clause… |
What is still needed
- Evidence that a 12.2.x waste/disposable-minimisation or ethical-sourcing policy extends, by procurement clause, supplier code of conduct, or tender requirement, to outsourced suppliers of goods (equipment, stationery, building contracts), and how. Ask: Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)
12.3 Proportion of recycled waste 27 points
12.3.1Waste tracking3 / 3worth 13.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 13.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | 1 for whole-university measurement, 0.5 for partial Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. University-wide waste tracking system where every faculty and campus (Ketintang, Lidah Wetan, Kampus Magetan) reports weights of waste generated and recycled each month in 2025 or 2026. 2. Waste dashboard or monthly register by the Smart Eco-Campus unit listing waste by type and tonnes generated and recycled across all campuses, with dated entries. 3. Annual waste audit report covering the whole university, stating method, tonnes generated and tonnes recycled, and the 2025 or 2026 reporting period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the waste measurement system, the units and campuses it covers (the whole university), what it records (waste generated and recycled), and dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Whole-university measurement | Done | In the narration, section 12.3.1.1, 6 sources (first: UNESA GreenMetric — Waste indicator dashboard, 2026) |
| Partial measurement | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The actual measured amounts of waste generated, recycled and sent to landfill at the whole-university level for 2025 and 2026, needed both to strengthen this indicator and to answer the linked 12.3.2 portal numbers Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A reproduced or exported extract of the 2025-2026 Waste sub-metric data from the GreenMetric portal (a downloaded report, screenshot, or PDF export of the 31 sub-indicators), since the public portal view shows only the aggregate score Ask: Direktorat TIK (information technology)
- Confirmation of the finalised 2026 Waste indicator score, shown as 0 (assessment cycle in progress) on the public portal as of 27 September 2026 Ask: Direktorat TIK (information technology)
12.3.2Proportion of waste recycledworth 13.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
12.4 Publication of a sustainability report 19.3 points
12.4.1Publication of a sustainability report0 / 3worth 19.3 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 19.3 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | 1 for annual, 0.6 for bi-annual only, 0.3 for less frequent Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Annual sustainability report published on unesa.ac.id for each of two consecutive years, such as 2024 and 2025, covering waste, energy, education and community activity. 2. Annual report (PPID) containing a dedicated sustainability chapter with SDG progress and figures, published every year, with the 2025 or 2026 edition's date. 3. SDG Accord style public annual report on UNESA's SDG actions, with at least two dated editions, the latest covering 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page with the sustainability report content itself (key sections, figures, edition years), showing it is published each year; a link or third-party platform alone is not enough. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Annual publication | Needs data | Request 2 below: Confirmation of the report's true publication frequency (annual, bi-annual, or less frequent), with at least two dated… |
| Bi-annual publication | Needs data | Request 2 below: Confirmation of the report's true publication frequency (annual, bi-annual, or less frequent), with at least two dated… |
| Less frequent publication | Needs data | Request 2 below: Confirmation of the report's true publication frequency (annual, bi-annual, or less frequent), with at least two dated… |
What is still needed
- Publication of the 2025 or 2026 edition of UNESA's Sustainability Report or SDGs Report. The SDGs Center already has live pages for 'Sustainability Report 2025' (https://sdgscenter.unesa.ac.id/page/sustainability-report-2025) and 'SDGs Report 2025' (https://sdgscenter.unesa.ac.id/page/sdgs-report-2025), but as checked on 27 September 2026 both pages carry only the title, with no report text, PDF or download link. Ask: SDGs Center
- Confirmation of the report's true publication frequency (annual, bi-annual, or less frequent), with at least two dated editions to support whichever frequency is claimed. Ask: SDGs Center
- Whether the internal draft 'SDGs UNESA Report' (Rector-prefaced as the '2025 UNESA SDGs Report', held in last year's evidence folder at last year/Evidence Sustainability Impact Ratings Cycle 2026/SDGs UNESA Report.docx) is the intended 2025 edition for the empty 'SDGs Report 2025' and 'Sustainability Report 2025' pages, and when it will be uploaded there. Ask: SDGs Center
SDG 13 · Climate ActionEvidence indicators: ~9.2 of 48 points secured · quantitative 25 · THE-computed research 272 full points5 evidence missing13.1 Research on climate action 27 points · computed by THE from publications
13.2 Low-carbon energy use 27 points
13.2.1Low-carbon energy tracking0 / 3worth 13.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 13.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Energy monitoring dashboard by the Smart Eco-Campus unit showing kWh from solar panels and other renewable sources for every UNESA campus and building, with 2025 or 2026 dated readings. 2. Annual energy audit covering the whole university that separates renewable electricity (solar PV) from grid electricity, with method, figures and period. 3. Metering programme with solar PV meters on all campuses, where monthly renewable generation is recorded and reported, with dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the low-carbon energy measurement system, the campuses and buildings it covers (the whole university), what it records, and dated figures or readings in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Whole-university measurement | Needs data | Request 2 below: If no whole-university figure exists, a partial measurement naming which campus, building or system is metered, with… |
| Partial measurement | Needs data | Request 2 below: If no whole-university figure exists, a partial measurement naming which campus, building or system is metered, with… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 whole-university measurement of low-carbon energy used (a kWh or GJ figure, broken down by source), from a dashboard, meter programme or energy audit. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- If no whole-university figure exists, a partial measurement naming which campus, building or system is metered, with its 2025 or 2026 kWh/GJ figure for low-carbon energy. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The result of the UI GreenMetric 2026 carbon-data and smart-building monitoring work flagged as in progress in the 4 March and 21 May 2026 coordination meetings: whether a measured low-carbon energy figure was produced by the submission deadline. Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
13.2.2Low-carbon energy useworth 13.5 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
13.3 Environmental education measures 23 points
13.3.1Local education programmes on climate0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the programmes or campaigns in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Public seminar or campaign for local residents and schools on climate change risks and adaptation, run by a faculty or the SDGs Center, with date, venue and participant count. 2. Workshop for school students and teachers on climate mitigation and early warning of floods or heat, held in 2025 or 2026, with organiser, topics and attendance. 3. Community campaign on reducing emissions, such as tree planting with a climate briefing for villagers, with date, location, audience and topics covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public unesa.ac.id news page naming the climate education programme, organiser, audience (local community or schools), climate topics taught, date in 2025 or 2026 and number of participants. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local education programmes on climate change | Needs data | Request 3 below: A university-wide or centrally-run local education programme or campaign on a climate-change topic, with its dates… |
What is still needed
- Confirmation that a 2025 or 2026 climate-change education programme or campaign (on risks, impacts, mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction or early warning) was actually delivered to a local audience such as a school or community group, not only designed as a student course project. Ask: Faculty of Vocational Studies
- Whether BPBD Surabaya or any school adopted the 2026 student-designed flood-education media (the picture book, playmat, or animations), with the date(s) and audience reached. Ask: Faculty of Vocational Studies
- A university-wide or centrally-run local education programme or campaign on a climate-change topic, with its dates, organiser and participant or audience numbers. Ask: SDGs Center
13.3.2Climate Action Plan, shared0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the plan in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. UNESA Climate Action Plan document setting measures on energy, transport and emissions reduction, with the issuing unit and date. 2. Public record that the Climate Action Plan was presented to a city or provincial environment agency in 2025 or 2026, with agency name, date and participants. 3. Meeting or workshop where UNESA shared the plan with community groups or local government, with date, attendees and a summary of feedback. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the Climate Action Plan's key measures and the 2025 or 2026 event where it was shared with a named local government body or community group. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| University Climate Action Plan | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 record that the Climate Action Plan (or an updated version) was formally shared with a named local… |
| Shared with local government and local community groups | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 record that the Climate Action Plan (or an updated version) was formally shared with a named local… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 record that the Climate Action Plan (or an updated version) was formally shared with a named local government body (for example the Surabaya city government or a provincial/district Dinas Lingkungan Hidup) or a local community group, such as a handover event, letter, or joint publication. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- Public copies of the other plan component documents named in last year's file (Circular of Sustainable Procurement, Sustainable Investment Circular, GHG Emission Reduction Program, Emission Reduction to 2050, SK SDGs 2022), if they still exist, to strengthen the existence evidence. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
13.3.3Co-operative planning for climate change disasters0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local tier: UNESA joins a Surabaya or East Java regional disaster agency (BPBD) forum or working group on flood and climate disaster contingency planning, with date and participants. 2. Regional tier: UNESA joins a provincial or national forum with government on climate disaster planning, such as a regional environment forum, with date, body and UNESA's role. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the government partner, the co-operative climate disaster planning activity, UNESA's role, whether it is local or regional, and the date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local co-operative planning | Needs data | Request 2 below: A local-level co-operative planning activity with a city or district government disaster agency (for example BPBD… |
| Regional co-operative planning | Needs data | Request 1 below: Confirmation of whether the Regional Java Forum for Rector Collaboration on Environmental Protection and Management (28… |
What is still needed
- Confirmation of whether the Regional Java Forum for Rector Collaboration on Environmental Protection and Management (28 July 2025, with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry) counts as regional co-operative planning for climate change disasters, or a clearer regional-level source naming climate-change disaster planning specifically (a joint contingency plan or working group on flood, drought or displacement risk). Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- A local-level co-operative planning activity with a city or district government disaster agency (for example BPBD Surabaya) on climate-change disaster planning, contingency planning, or early warning, with a public 2025 or 2026 source and date. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
13.3.4Inform and support government3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the support in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. UNESA researchers deliver a climate risk or early warning study, such as flood or drought risk mapping, to a city or provincial government body, with dates and the unit involved. 2. UNESA provides monitoring data or a model for climate risk to a regional disaster or planning agency, with the agency, data type and 2025 or 2026 date. 3. UNESA experts sit in a government working group on climate early warning and monitoring, with the assignment, body and date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the local or regional government body, what UNESA provided (study, data, model), the UNESA unit and experts, and the date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Support to government on climate disaster or risk early warning and monitoring | Done | In the narration, section 13.3.4.1, 1 source (first: Membaca Masa Depan Pangan Jawa Timur: FKP UNESA dan BRIDA Jalin Riset Mitigasi…, 2025-10-29) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that the FKP-BRIDA Jawa Timur spatial climate-risk study has produced or delivered a monitoring output, data set or model to the agency, and whether the collaboration continued into 2026. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Whether the FMIPA collaboration with Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Jawa Timur (Desa/Kelurahan Berseri, since 2012) had any 2025-2026 activity that could add a second, longer-running example. Ask: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
- Whether the FKP study has since produced or handed over any monitoring output, data set or model to BRIDA Jawa Timur. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
13.3.5Environmental education collaborate with NGO3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the collaborations in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint climate adaptation programme with an environmental NGO, such as mangrove planting or flood preparedness training for villages, with NGO name, date and participants. 2. Research collaboration with a non-profit environmental organisation on climate adaptation, with a signed agreement or event, its date, UNESA unit and activities. 3. Student volunteer programme with a non-profit group on climate adaptation, such as a river clean-up with a resilience workshop, with dates and numbers. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming a genuine non-profit NGO, the climate adaptation activity done together, the UNESA unit involved, and the date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration with an NGO on climate adaptation | Done | In the narration, section 13.3.5.1, 3 sources (first: Tanam Biopori, Aksi Nyata FISIPOL UNESA dan Yayasan Menabung Air dalam…, 2025-11-17) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The Memorandum of Agreement text between FISIPOL and the Menabung Air Foundation, and confirmation of the foundation's formal non-profit or foundation (yayasan) registration, since it operates under the Maesa Group of companies. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
13.4 Commitment to carbon neutral university 23 points
13.4.1Commitment to carbon neutral university0 / 5worth 11.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
Up to five points based on: Existence of target; Evidence provided - up to one point; Is the evidence provided public - one point; Scopes covered - maximum of three points.
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment to a carbon-neutral target date | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas… |
| Scope 1 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas… |
| Scope 1 and 2 | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas… |
| Scope 1, 2 and 3 (partial) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas… |
| Scope 1, 2 and 3 (full) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas… |
What is still needed
- A dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas Protocol Scope 1 and Scope 2, with what falls under each scope claimed (for example Scope 1: campus vehicles and generators; Scope 2: purchased electricity; Scope 3: commuting, procurement, waste, water). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Whether any carbon-neutrality claim would rely on carbon credits, and if so whether they are high-integrity, permanent-removal credits or lower-integrity avoidance credits, per THE's guidance. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
13.4.2Achieve by date– / 4worth 11.5 of 100Quantitative
How the points are scored
Up to four points based on: Date for achieved prior to 2025 - 4 points; Date for achieved by: 2025-2029 - 3 points; Date for achieved by: 2030-2039 - 2 points; Date for achieved by: 2040-2049 - 1 point; Date for achieved by: 2050 or later - 0.5 points." (The methodology PDF says "prior to 2025" and "2025-2029"; the workbook's SDG13 sheet gives the same bracket structure but with the years "prior to 2023" and "2023-2029" instead, so the two disagree on the boundary year. Follow the PDF's 2025/2029 wording unless told otherwise, and flag this discrepancy for whoever enters the portal number.).
Nothing open.
Published article
SDG 14 · Life Below WaterNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~41.3 of 73 points secured · quantitative 0 · THE-computed research 278 full points1 can be strengthened6 evidence missing14.1 Research on life below water 27 points · computed by THE from publications
14.2 Supporting aquatic ecosystems through education 15.3 points
14.2.1Fresh-water ecosystems (community outreach)3 / 3worth 5.1 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Weights below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Training for village fish-pond farmers on pond water management and fresh-water conservation, free of charge, held in 2025 or 2026 by the Aquaculture programme, with an attendance list. 2. Community service programme (PKM) on river-water conservation and irrigation practice for a farmer group near Surabaya, dated 2025 or 2026. 3. Paid short course on fresh-water aquaculture and water-quality management for fish farmers, with the fee and the date shown. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the programme, the fresh-water topic, the community it served, whether it was free or paid, and its date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free educational programmes on fresh-water ecosystems | Done | In the narration, section 14.2.1.1, 2 sources (first: Tim Akuakultur UNESA Latih Warga Trepan Lamongan Teknologi Fermentasi dan…, 2026-06-02) |
| Paid educational programmes on fresh-water ecosystems | Done | In the narration, section 14.2.1.1, 2 sources (first: Tim Akuakultur UNESA Latih Warga Trepan Lamongan Teknologi Fermentasi dan…, 2026-06-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Whether the Trepan training (24 May 2026) and the madrasah teacher training (June 2025) charged participants any fee. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- A programme on irrigation practice, river, pond or wetland conservation, or water management for communities, if one exists. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
14.2.2Sustainable fisheries (community outreach)3 / 3worth 5.1 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Weights below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free training for a Lamongan village group on sustainable fish farming (fermented feed, biofloc), held in 2025 or 2026 by the Aquaculture programme, with the attendance list. 2. Community outreach on sustainable management of a coastal fishery or mangrove eco-tourism site, with a programme and a 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Paid workshop for fish farmers or tourism operators on sustainable aquaculture practice, with the fee shown. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the programme, the subject (fisheries, aquaculture or tourism), the community reached, free or paid, and its date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free educational programmes or outreach on sustainable fisheries, aquaculture and tourism | Done | In the narration, section 14.2.2.1, 6 sources (first: Realisasikan Ormawa Berdampak, DPM FIP UNESA Loloa Pendanaan PPK Ormawa 2026…, 2026-05-26) |
| Paid educational programmes or outreach on sustainable fisheries, aquaculture and tourism | Done | In the narration, section 14.2.2.1, 6 sources (first: Realisasikan Ormawa Berdampak, DPM FIP UNESA Loloa Pendanaan PPK Ormawa 2026…, 2026-05-26) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that the Ngemboh, Trepan, madrasah teacher and Aquaculture Fest activities charged participants no fee. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Attendance numbers and dates of the Ngemboh demonstrations and training sessions after 17 June 2026, and of the June 2025 teacher training. Ask: Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool
14.2.3Overfishing (community outreach)0 / 3worth 5.1 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Weights below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free public seminar on overfishing and the threat to endangered fish species (for example the work behind SDG 14 posts on protected species), with an audience from fishing communities, dated 2025 or 2026. 2. Awareness campaign against destructive and illegal fishing for coastal villagers, with materials and a date in 2025 or 2026. 3. School and community talks on sustainable catch and IUU fishing, with attendance and a 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the outreach activity, the overfishing or IUU topic, the audience reached, free or paid, and its date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free outreach activities on overfishing and illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 outreach activity for local or national communities (fishers, coastal villages, schools, the public) on… |
| Paid outreach activities on overfishing and illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 outreach activity for local or national communities (fishers, coastal villages, schools, the public) on… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 outreach activity for local or national communities (fishers, coastal villages, schools, the public) on overfishing, illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing or destructive fishing practices, with its date, audience and whether it was free or paid. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
14.3 Supporting aquatic ecosystems through action 19.4 points
14.3.1Conservation and sustainable utilisation of the oceans (events)3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Coastal clean-up and mangrove planting organised by a UNESA faculty or student group for World Mangrove Day or World Oceans Day, with a 2025 or 2026 date and attendance. 2. Public seminar on conservation of marine resources with an external partner, UNESA as co-host, dated 2025 or 2026. 3. UNESA participation as a supporter in a provincial mangrove festival, with a programme and a date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page reporting the event: who organised it, the ocean, river or marine resource it concerned, what was done, and its date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Events promoting conservation and sustainable utilisation of oceans, seas, lakes, rivers and marine resources | Done | In the narration, section 14.3.1.1, 7 sources (first: Mahasiswi Kebidanan FK UNESA Ikuti International Summer Course 2026: Wujudkan…, 2026-02-13) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The beach where Greenty Action Day 2026 took place, the number of participants, and the amount of waste collected. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Whether UNESA organised or co-organised the 5 February 2026 Wonorejo activity (summer course organiser, participants, mangrove numbers). Ask: Unit to be identified
14.3.2Food from aquatic ecosystems (policies)0 / 4worth 4.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or canteen management guideline requiring fish and seafood served on campus to come from legal, sustainable catch or certified aquaculture, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Canteen tenant contract clause banning protected or endangered species and requiring supplier documentation, dated and in force in 2025 or 2026. 3. Public sustainable-food policy page stating the rule for aquatic food, the issuing body and its date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, the sustainable-harvest requirement for aquatic food on campus, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on sustainably harvested food from aquatic ecosystems on campus | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, circular, canteen or catering rule, tenant contract clause or procurement rule)… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, circular, canteen or catering rule, tenant contract clause or procurement rule) that requires fish, seafood and other aquatic food served or sold on campus to be sustainably harvested, with its number, date (2022 to 2026) and public link. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
14.3.3Maintain ecosystems and their biodiversity (direct work)3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Funded research on the ecology and conservation of mangrove or coastal species near Surabaya (for example a 2026 research grant for coastal clam ecology), with its report and period. 2. Programme with a government agency or industry partner to restore mangrove or breed an endangered fish species, with a 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Published study on protecting a threatened aquatic species or habitat, authored by UNESA staff, with the publication date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the work: the ecosystem and species, UNESA's research or engagement role, the partner if any, and the 2025 or 2026 period. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Direct work (research and/or engagement with industries) to maintain and extend ecosystems and their biodiversity | Done | In the narration, section 14.3.3.1, 6 sources (first: LPPM UNESA Hibahkan Pendanaan Penelitian Dasar Kolaborasi, Dosen Akuakultur…, 2026-03-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Project reports or outputs (field sites, sampling dates, species lists) for the Tor tambra and Anadara studies, and whether either species is listed as threatened. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Any engagement with an industry or agency partner (a site agreement or MoU for Telaga Banyu Biru, Pantai Boom or the Kebun Raya Mangrove). Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
14.3.4Technologies towards aquatic ecosystem damage prevention (direct work)3 / 3worth 4.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Smart-aquaculture or biofloc system developed with an aquaculture company that cuts effluent into coastal waters, with a 2025 or 2026 trial date. 2. Student or staff research funded in 2026 on processing marine microplastics, with a project report. 3. Industry guest-lecture and joint pilot on low-impact aquaculture feed or wastewater treatment, with a date and partner named. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the technology or practice, how it prevents damage to aquatic ecosystems, the industry link or research output, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Direct work (research and/or engagement with industries) on technologies or practices to minimise or prevent damage to aquatic ecosystems | Done | In the narration, section 14.3.4.1, 4 sources (first: Mahasiswa S1 Akuakultur, Fakultas Ketahanan Pangan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya…, 2026-02-26) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A joint trial, MoU or research project with an aquaculture or marine company on a damage-reducing technology (for example effluent treatment, biofloc scale-up). Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Measured results of the bioflok practicum (water exchange, effluent quality) and the MARICYCLE project plan. Ask: Unit to be identified
14.4 Water sensitive waste disposal 19.3 points
14.4.1Water discharge guidelines and standards3 / 3worth 6.5 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. SOP for wastewater treatment (IPAL) at the campus stating the effluent quality limits and monitoring, issued before or during 2025. 2. Laboratory effluent guideline requiring neutralisation and quality checks before discharge, dated and in force in 2025. 3. Wastewater discharge permit or technical directive from the city environment office that applies to UNESA campuses, with the permit date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the standard or guideline, its issuer, the discharge quality limits or practices, the campuses covered, and the date it took effect (by 2025). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Water quality standards and guidelines for water discharges | Done | In the narration, section 14.4.1.1, 5 sources (first: Persetujuan Teknis Pemenuhan Baku Mutu Air Limbah oleh Universitas Negeri…, 2023-11-16) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A public page or file that states the effluent standard and the approvals. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The name of the UNESA unit that takes the monthly wastewater samples and writes the quarterly reports. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Confirmation of the wording against the October 2026 city inspection. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The Ketintang technical approval Number 600.4.5.2/987/436.7.10/2024 itself, and the quarterly wastewater monitoring reports sent to the Environment Office in 2025 and 2026. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- D1, D2, D3, D4 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
14.4.2Action plan to reducing plastic waste0 / 3worth 6.5 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6.5 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. USSC plan to cut single-use plastic on campus with targets, owners and a timeline, issued by 2025. 2. Rector's circular with a programme of actions (tumbler use, plastic-free events, plastic waste collection and recycling into pellets) and responsible units, dated by 2025. 3. Public zero-waste programme document listing plastic reduction steps and responsibilities. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the plan: its title, issuer, the plastic-reduction actions, responsible units, timeline or targets, and the date it was in place (by 2025). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Action plan to reduce plastic waste on campus | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA action plan to reduce plastic waste on campus: the actions (single-use plastic restrictions, tumbler and refill… |
What is still needed
- A UNESA action plan to reduce plastic waste on campus: the actions (single-use plastic restrictions, tumbler and refill schemes, plastic collection and recycling), the owner unit, targets or timeline, its number and date (in place by 2025), and a public link. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
14.4.3Reducing marine pollution (policy)0 / 4worth 6.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 6.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on environmental management with a clause on preventing waste, plastic and wastewater from reaching rivers and the sea, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. USSC environmental policy statement covering land-based pollution of waterways and coasts, dated and in force in 2025 or 2026. 3. Zero-waste regulation stating that no campus waste is discharged to rivers or the sea, with issuing body and date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, the marine or waterway pollution it targets and how, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on preventing and reducing marine pollution from land-based activities | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA policy that prevents or reduces marine and river-borne pollution from land-based activities (plastic and solid… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- A UNESA policy that prevents or reduces marine and river-borne pollution from land-based activities (plastic and solid waste, wastewater, chemicals, hazardous waste), with its number, a date in 2022 to 2026 and a public link. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
14.5 Maintaining a local ecosystem 19 points
14.5.1Minimizing alteration of aquatic ecosystems (plan)2 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Campus environmental management plan (UKL-UPL) that sets measures to protect the river or canal beside the campus from fill, drainage and discharge impacts, in place by 2025. 2. Campus master plan section on retaining ponds and green space to avoid altering local waterways. 3. Biodiversity or eco-campus plan on controlling invasive species in campus ponds. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the plan, the nearby aquatic ecosystem, the alterations it limits and the date it was in place (by 2025). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Plan to minimise physical, chemical and biological alterations of related aquatic ecosystems | Done | In the narration, section 14.5.1.1, 2 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kegiatan Sarana Pelayanan Umum…, 2024-02-27) |
What is still needed
- A named local aquatic ecosystem (river, canal, pond, coast) that the plan protects, and a plan clause on biological alteration (for example invasive species, habitat). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public page for the plans, and confirmation of the wording against the October 2026 city inspection. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1, D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
14.5.2Monitoring the health of aquatic ecosystems3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Water quality monitoring of a river or pond near the campus by a faculty laboratory, with parameters and dates in 2025 or 2026. 2. Student and lecturer biodiversity survey of mangrove or coastal fauna near Surabaya, with species lists and the survey date. 3. Environmental laboratory report on the health of a local waterway, dated 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing what is monitored, in which local aquatic ecosystem, the parameters and frequency, who does it, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring of the health of aquatic ecosystems around the university | Done | In the narration, section 14.5.2.1, 2 sources (first: Tim BSO Ecocampus Bersama Dosen Divisi KH Gelar Aksi Lingkungan dalam…, 2026-06-08) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Measured data and frequency for the bozem monitoring (parameters, species lists, dates) and a record of the mangrove survey sites and dates. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
14.5.3Programmes towards good aquatic stewardship practices3 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 (depends on which option THE accepts) | Weights below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Standing coastal ecosystem programme (for example a recurring student action day for the coast) run each semester in 2025 and 2026 with community partners. 2. Incentive such as an award or grant for student projects that protect a local river or pond, awarded in 2025 or 2026. 3. One-off river or coast stewardship day with a village partner, dated 2025 or 2026 (supports the ad hoc tier). |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the programme or incentive, the stewardship practice, the partners, whether it repeats or is one-off, and its dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| On-going programmes and incentives for good aquatic stewardship | Done | In the narration, section 14.5.3.1, 2 sources (first: Tim BSO Ecocampus Bersama Dosen Divisi KH Gelar Aksi Lingkungan dalam…, 2026-06-08) |
| Ad hoc programmes and incentives for good aquatic stewardship | Done | In the narration, section 14.5.3.1, 2 sources (first: Tim BSO Ecocampus Bersama Dosen Divisi KH Gelar Aksi Lingkungan dalam…, 2026-06-08) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A schedule or record showing how often the bozem care and the Wonorejo activities repeat (monthly plan, annual calendar). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
14.5.4Collaboration for shared aquatic ecosystems0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint mangrove planting and maintenance with a coastal village group near Surabaya, with partners named and a 2025 or 2026 date. 2. Community service programme with a fishers' or village group to clean and maintain a shared river or pond, dated 2025 or 2026. 3. Signed cooperation between a UNESA faculty and a local conservation group on a coastal ecosystem, with the activity report. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the collaboration, the community partner, the shared aquatic ecosystem, what was done together, and its dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration with the local community to maintain shared aquatic ecosystems | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 collaboration between UNESA and a community partner (village, fishers' or farmers' group, community… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 collaboration between UNESA and a community partner (village, fishers' or farmers' group, community conservation group, city environment office) to maintain a shared aquatic ecosystem near the university (Surabaya or its immediate surroundings), with the ecosystem, the joint activity and the dates. Ask: Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool
14.5.5Watershed management strategy0 / 3worth 3.8 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.8 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint river-basin management strategy with the provincial water agency, with UNESA as a named partner and a species survey underlying it, in place by 2025. 2. Campus watershed plan describing the drainage to a nearby river, the local fish and plant species, and restoration actions, with implementation reports. 3. Public watershed management strategy document of a partnership that UNESA joined, with dates and actions. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the strategy, the watershed, the aquatic species diversity it is based on, what has been implemented, and the date it was in place (by 2025). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Implemented watershed management strategy based on location-specific diversity of aquatic species | Needs data | Request 1 below: An implemented watershed management strategy (UNESA's own or a joint one with a river-basin authority or the city)… |
What is still needed
- An implemented watershed management strategy (UNESA's own or a joint one with a river-basin authority or the city), based on local aquatic species diversity, in place by 2025, with UNESA's role and a public link. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
SDG 15 · Life on LandNot submittedEvidence indicators: ~45.3 of 73 points secured · quantitative 0 · THE-computed research 278 full points6 evidence missing15.1 Research on land ecosystems 27 points · computed by THE from publications
15.2 Supporting land ecosystems through education 23 points
15.2.1Events about sustainable use of land3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the events in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Tree-planting day on campus or in a partner village for World Environment Day or Earth Day, with date, organiser, number of trees and participants, stating the aim of conserving land and green cover (2025 or 2026). 2. Seminar or field visit on forest and wild land conservation or sustainable land use open to students and the public, with programme, speakers, date and attendance. 3. Mangrove, wetland or forest protection event run or supported by a faculty or study programme, with its conservation aim, partner and date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public unesa.ac.id page or news item naming the event(s), date(s) in 2025 or 2026, organiser, the conservation or sustainable land-use aim, and who took part. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Events promoting conservation and sustainable utilisation of land, including forests and wild land | Done | In the narration, section 15.2.1.1, 5 sources (first: Peringati Hari Lingkungan Hidup, Kampus UNESA Magetan Tanam Pohon Tabebuya…, 2025-06-12) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Exact date of the Magetan Tabebuya planting (the post is dated 12 June 2025 and names World Environment Day, 5 June) and attendance figures for the Magetan and Tuban events. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
15.2.2Sustainably farmed food on campus0 / 4worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or Surat Keputusan Rektor requiring food sold and served on campus to come from sustainably farmed, local or certified suppliers, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Canteen and catering tender or tenant guideline requiring produce from sustainable farming (organic, low-pesticide, local), stating the clause, units covered and the year in force. 3. Campus policy linking canteen supply to the university's own sustainable farm or urban-farming produce, with the rule, the units covered and its approval date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, how it ensures campus food is sustainably farmed, which outlets it covers, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy to ensure food on campus is sustainably farmed | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, decision, circular or tenant/catering contract clause) that ties food sold or… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | Request 2 below: The 2022-2026 creation or review date and a public link for any such policy. |
What is still needed
- A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, decision, circular or tenant/catering contract clause) that ties food sold or served on campus to sustainable farming: local, organic or certified suppliers, supply from the campus farm, or canteen and food-court tenant rules, with title, number, date and clause. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The 2022-2026 creation or review date and a public link for any such policy. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
15.2.3Maintain and extend current ecosystems' biodiversity3 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the direct work in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Campus greening programme planting and maintaining native and shade trees and plants, with dates, number of trees or area and the unit responsible, in 2025 or 2026. 2. Animal conservation or breeding programme kept by a faculty (for example deer or rabbits), with species, purpose, care routine and dates in 2025 or 2026. 3. Restoration action such as mangrove, wetland or riverbank planting led by UNESA, naming the threatened ecosystem, the plants or animals protected, partners and dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the work UNESA itself carries out to maintain or extend an ecosystem and its plant or animal biodiversity, with the species or area, who does it, and 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Direct work to maintain and extend existing ecosystems and their biodiversity | Done | In the narration, section 15.2.3.1, 8 sources (first: Mahasiswa S1 Pendidikan Geografi Berkegiatan Eco Fun Mangrove Day, 2026-04-26) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A list of UNESA's own planting and maintenance work for 2025 and 2026 with numbers (trees planted, species, area), and the result of the campus flora and fauna inventory planned in March 2026. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Whether any ecosystem or species under threat is protected on a UNESA campus (the bosem, campus pond or any retained woodland). Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D2, D3 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
15.2.4Educational programmes on ecosystems0 / 3worth 4.6 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Rogrammes - maximum one point for free access, 0.25 points for charged access only Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free public programme on wild flora and fauna, such as an open lecture, school visit or field-learning day on local species, with audience, date and the statement that attendance is free. 2. Wildlife or herpetofauna learning programme for school pupils and the public run with a conservation partner, with dates in 2025 or 2026 and no entry fee. 3. Biodiversity education booth or workshop at a public event (for example a car-free day or National Flora and Fauna Day), free to visitors, with date, place and topics. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the programme, its audience from local or national communities, its 2025 or 2026 date, the ecosystem, wild flora and fauna content, and whether access is free or charged. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free programmes on ecosystems (wild flora and fauna) | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 programme, outreach or course open to local or national communities (schools, villages, visitors) that… |
| Paid (charged access) programmes on ecosystems | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 programme, outreach or course open to local or national communities (schools, villages, visitors) that… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 programme, outreach or course open to local or national communities (schools, villages, visitors) that teaches about ecosystems and wild plants and animals, with title, date, audience, place and whether access was free or charged. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Whether any such programme was free or charged. Ask: Unit to be identified
15.2.5Sustainable management of land for agriculture (educational outreach)3 / 3worth 2.3 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.3 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Rogrammes - maximum one point for free access, 0.25 points for charged access only Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free community training on sustainable farming (soil care, organic fertiliser, hydroponics or silage) for farmers or villagers, with date, place, participants and the statement that it is free. 2. Community-service (PKM) programme teaching a village group sustainable land management for crops or livestock feed, with outputs and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Open farm visit or training for school pupils and farmers at a faculty teaching farm on sustainable agriculture, with date, audience and no fee. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the programme or outreach, the farming or village community served, the sustainable land-management content, the 2025 or 2026 date, and whether access is free or charged. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free programmes or outreach on sustainable land management for agriculture | Done | In the narration, section 15.2.5.1, 5 sources (first: Menyemai Harapan di Tanah Lamongan: FKP UNESA dan SENTRA Dorong Inovasi Pupuk…, 2025-12-21) |
| Paid (charged access) programmes or outreach on sustainable land management for agriculture | Done | In the narration, section 15.2.5.1, 5 sources (first: Menyemai Harapan di Tanah Lamongan: FKP UNESA dan SENTRA Dorong Inovasi Pupuk…, 2025-12-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Written confirmation that participants paid no fee for the Lamongan, Menanggal and school sessions. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
- Attendance numbers and dates for the Lamongan sessions (the Solokuro post gives 14 August 2026 and calls it a Saturday, but 14 August 2026 is a Friday) and a record of any follow-up harvest results. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
15.2.6Sustainable management of land for tourism (educational outreach)0 / 3worth 2.3 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 2.3 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Rogrammes - maximum one point for free access, 0.25 points for charged access only Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Free training for a village tourism group on managing land sustainably for eco-tourism or a village destination, with date, place, participants and no fee. 2. Student-community programme helping a village develop an educational, conservation-based tourist spot, with the land-use and sustainability content and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Public workshop on sustainable tourism and land use for local communities, with programme, speakers, date and the statement that it is free. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the programme or outreach, the community or tourism group served, the sustainable land management for tourism content, the 2025 or 2026 date, and whether access is free or charged. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Free programmes or outreach on sustainable land management for tourism | Needs data | Request 2 below: Confirmation that the Sendang Made programme teaches land or spring conservation, and whether it was free for villagers. |
| Paid (charged access) programmes or outreach on sustainable land management for tourism | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 outreach or programme for local or national communities on managing land for tourism sustainably… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 outreach or programme for local or national communities on managing land for tourism sustainably (eco-tourism, conservation-based village tourism, visitor and land-use limits), with title, date, audience, place and whether free or charged. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Confirmation that the Sendang Made programme teaches land or spring conservation, and whether it was free for villagers. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
15.3 Supporting land ecosystems through action 27 points
15.3.1Sustainable use, conservation and restoration of land (policy)4 / 4worth 5.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 5.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or campus master plan clause committing UNESA to conserving, restoring and sustainably using campus green space, trees and any forest or hill land it holds, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Campus green-space policy requiring a minimum share of green open space, tree protection and replanting, with the units responsible and the approval year. 3. Environmental management plan or approval condition adopted by the university requiring green-space provision and land restoration, with its date and the campuses covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, the land and ecosystems it covers, its conservation, restoration and sustainable-use requirements, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems | Done | In the narration, section 15.3.1.1, 6 sources (first: Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2022 tentang Perguruan…, 2022-10-20) |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Done | In the narration, section 15.3.1.2, 4 sources (first: Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2022 tentang Perguruan…, 2022-10-20) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A UNESA regulation or master plan that names the land to conserve (campus woodland, bosem, any hill, forest or dry land that UNESA holds or shares) and what restoration it requires. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public copy of the two environmental approvals (DELH decisions) or a public page that reproduces their green-space conditions. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D2, D3 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
15.3.2Monitoring IUCN and other conservation species (policies)0 / 4worth 5.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 5.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or environmental policy requiring identification, monitoring and protection of IUCN Red Listed and nationally protected species found on or near campus, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Campus biodiversity SOP requiring a periodic species survey checked against the IUCN Red List and the national protected-species list, with the responsible unit and the survey cycle. 3. Environmental management plan (monitoring chapter) naming listed species, how they are monitored and protected, and the year it was approved. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, how listed species are identified, monitored and protected, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy to identify, monitor and protect IUCN Red Listed and national conservation list species | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, decision or environmental management plan clause) to identify, monitor and protect… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- A UNESA policy (Rector's Regulation, decision or environmental management plan clause) to identify, monitor and protect IUCN Red List and national conservation list species with habitat in areas affected by UNESA's operations, with title, number, date and clause. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public copy and a 2022-2026 date for such a policy; alternatively a decision to adopt one (for example in the flora and fauna inventory planned on 4 March 2026). Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
15.3.3Local biodiversity included in planning and development3 / 3worth 5.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the inclusion in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Flora and fauna baseline survey done before a campus construction project, checked against the national protected-species list, with the findings and the survey date (2025 or 2026). 2. Building project design that keeps existing trees, sets a green-space ratio and replants native species, with the requirement, the project and its 2025 or 2026 date. 3. Environmental impact or evaluation document for a campus development that includes a biodiversity chapter and green-space plan, with approval date and campus covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page describing the planning or development process, the biodiversity step taken (survey, tree retention, green-space ratio, protected-species check), who did it, and its 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local biodiversity included in planning and development | Done | In the narration, section 15.3.3.1, 3 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kampus Ketintang UNESA dan Keputusan…, 2025-07-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The species-level survey report behind the DELH tables (survey dates, method, diversity index) and the flora and fauna inventory planned in March 2026. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public copy of the DELH decision or a public page that reproduces its flora and fauna findings. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1, D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
15.3.4Alien species impact reduction (policies)0 / 4worth 5.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 5.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or campus landscape rule requiring native species in planting lists and controlling invasive alien plants, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Campus biosecurity guideline banning release of pets, aquarium fish or non-native plants on campus and setting removal steps, with the responsible unit and approval year. 3. Landscape and greening SOP naming invasive alien species to avoid or remove, using the IUCN definition, with its date and units covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, how it reduces the impact of alien species on campus, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 0 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy to reduce the impact of alien species on campus | Needs data | Request 1 below: A UNESA policy that prevents, controls or removes alien (invasive) plants and animals on campus, such as a planting… |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
What is still needed
- A UNESA policy that prevents, controls or removes alien (invasive) plants and animals on campus, such as a planting list favouring native species, a rule against releasing pets or aquarium species, or an invasive-plant control rule, with title, number, date and clause. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public copy and a 2022-2026 date for such a policy, with the IUCN definition of alien species applied. Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
15.3.5Collaboration for shared land ecosystems0 / 3worth 5.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 5.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the collaboration in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint planting or care of a shared green belt, river bank or village forest with a neighbouring community, with partners, UNESA's role, area and dates in 2025 or 2026. 2. Community-service programme with a village to protect a shared wetland, mangrove or park, naming the community group, the land and the activities. 3. Agreement or MoU with a local community or local government to maintain a shared green space, with signing date and activities carried out in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the local community partner, the shared land ecosystem, what UNESA and the community do together to maintain it, and 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration with the local community to maintain shared land ecosystems | Needs data | Request 1 below: A 2025 or 2026 collaboration between UNESA and a local community (village, neighbourhood, school, community group or… |
What is still needed
- A 2025 or 2026 collaboration between UNESA and a local community (village, neighbourhood, school, community group or local government) to maintain a land ecosystem that both share, such as a community forest, river bank, park, green belt or spring, with partner name, what is maintained, UNESA's role and dates. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
- Whether the Sendang Made programme includes joint care of the spring and its surroundings with residents, and for how long. Ask: Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)
15.4 Land sensitive waste disposal 23 points
15.4.1Water discharge guidelines and standards3 / 3worth 7.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 7.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the standards and guidelines in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Wastewater treatment plant (IPAL) standard operating procedure and the city's technical approval for meeting wastewater quality standards, with approval number and date, in force in 2025. 2. Laboratory effluent guideline stating discharge limits and test frequency before water leaves campus, with the responsible unit and the year in force. 3. Environmental management plan chapter setting wastewater quality limits, monitoring points and reporting, with approval date and campuses covered. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the water-discharge standard or guideline, the quality limits or tests it sets, who is responsible, the approval number or date, and that it was in place by 2025. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Water quality standards and guidelines for water discharges | Done | In the narration, section 15.4.1.1, 3 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kampus Lidah Wetan UNESA dan Keputusan…, 2024-02-27) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The two Technical Approval documents (No. 600.4.5.2/1020/436.7.10/2023 and No. 600.4.5.2/987/436.7.10/2024), the operating-readiness certificate (SLO) of the treatment plants and the latest laboratory results. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- A public page or published document carrying the standards. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1, D2 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
15.4.2Policy on plastic waste reduction4 / 4worth 7.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 7.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or Surat Edaran Rektor reducing plastic waste on campus (single-use bottles, bags, wrapping), with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Plastic-reduction commitment in the campus waste-management policy, citing the city's plastic-bag reduction regulation, with units covered and the year in force. 3. Campus programme with a plastic-waste reduction target (tumbler rule, plastic-free canteen) with start date, units involved and monitoring method. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the policy's title, issuer, what plastic items it restricts, where it applies on campus, and its issue or review date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy on reducing plastic waste on campus | Done | In the narration, section 15.4.2.1, 2 sources (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kampus Ketintang UNESA dan Keputusan…, 2025-07-28) |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Done | In the narration, section 15.4.2.2, 1 source (first: Dokumen Evaluasi Lingkungan Hidup (DELH) Kampus Ketintang UNESA dan Keputusan…, 2025-07-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A university-wide rule on single-use plastic (a Rector's Regulation, decision or circular with number, date and clause), such as the circular on reducing single-use plastic and disposable packaging that UNESA's UI GreenMetric submission describes but does not attach. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- The equivalent plastic-reduction provision for the Lidah Wetan campus, whose evaluation mentions plastic only as a waste type, and a public copy of the Ketintang approval. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- D1 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
15.4.3Policy on hazardous waste disposal4 / 4worth 7.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 7.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or SOP on hazardous and toxic waste (B3), defining chemical, biological and radiological waste and how it is stored and disposed, with issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Hazardous-waste temporary storage point (TPS B3) procedure with licensed hauler agreement and manifests, dated and applied in faculties and the clinic. 3. Public page of the Smart Eco-Campus unit describing hazardous-waste handling practice, the units covered, the licensed hauler and the 2025 or 2026 period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the policy, process or practice on hazardous waste disposal, what counts as hazardous, how disposal works, who runs it, and its date (2022-2026). |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy, process or practice on hazardous-waste disposal | Done | In the narration, section 15.4.3.1, 9 sources (first: Arahan Rincian Teknis Pengelolaan (Penyimpanan) Limbah B3 oleh Universitas…, 2023-11-13) |
| Policy created or reviewed in 2022-2026 | Done | In the narration, section 15.4.3.2, 2 sources (first: Arahan Rincian Teknis Pengelolaan (Penyimpanan) Limbah B3 oleh Universitas…, 2023-11-13) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A public page or an unesa.ac.id article that carries these facts (the 12.2.3 article, once published), approval from the processor before naming it, and personal data (names, signatures, driver names, bank accounts) covered in any uploaded copy. Ask: Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)
- Hazardous waste pickups for the Ketintang campus (FMIPA laboratories) in 2025 or 2026 and the Klinik contract in force for the June and July 2026 pickups; a statement on radiological waste. Ask: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA)
- D1 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
- D1, D4, D5, D2, D3, D6, D8, D9 has no public link. THE gives a point for public evidence: publish it or cite a public copy.
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
SDG 16 · Peace, Justice and Strong InstitutionsEvidence indicators: ~39.9 of 46.6 points secured · quantitative 26.4 · THE-computed research 278 full points2 evidence missing16.1 Research on peace and justice 27 points · computed by THE from publications
16.2 University governance measures 26.6 points
16.2.1Elected representation0 / 3worth 3.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | 0.33 per option Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Students: the highest governing body (such as the Senat or Board of Trustees) includes a student representative chosen by vote of the student body, with the election date. 2. Faculty: lecturers on the Senat are elected by lecturers through a vote, not appointed by the Rector, shown by the election committee decree and results. 3. Staff: a non-academic staff representative elected by staff on the governing body, shown by the election notice, result and term dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the highest governing body and, for students, faculty and staff, each representative, how elected rather than appointed, and term dates covering 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Students (both undergraduate and graduate) | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether the University Academic Senate (SAU), rather than the MWA, is the body THE should treat as UNESA's 'highest… |
| Faculty | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether the University Academic Senate (SAU), rather than the MWA, is the body THE should treat as UNESA's 'highest… |
| Staff (non-faculty employees) | Needs data | Request 2 below: Whether the University Academic Senate (SAU), rather than the MWA, is the body THE should treat as UNESA's 'highest… |
What is still needed
- The Peraturan Rektor on the procedure for choosing MWA members (referred to by the Statuta but not yet located), or a 2025-2026 dated record showing whether the student, non-SAU lecturer and education-staff MWA seats were filled by an election within each group before SAU nominated them, or by SAU/ministerial appointment alone Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- Whether the University Academic Senate (SAU), rather than the MWA, is the body THE should treat as UNESA's 'highest governing body' for this indicator, given that SAU's own faculty lecturer seats are Statuta-elected but SAU has no student or non-faculty staff seat Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
16.2.2Students' union3 / 3worth 3.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | 0.33 per option: governance input, student support, social activities Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Governance input: Peraturan Rektor recognising the student executive body (BEM) and giving it a seat or formal consultation on university decisions, with date. 2. Student support: BEM or Ormawa runs welfare and advocacy services such as a student complaints desk or scholarship help, with 2025 or 2026 activity and dates. 3. Social activities: Ormawa organises sports, arts and community events run by students, with dates, participants and a statement of operating independently of the university. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the student union (BEM or Ormawa), how it works independently, and its governance input, student support and social activities with dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Union provides governance input to university | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.2.1, 1 source (first: Dialog Aspirasi Mahasiswa FBS Unesa 2026: Membangun Budaya Partisipatif dan…, 2026-06-02) |
| Union provides support for students | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.2.2, 1 source (first: Membangun Kepemimpinan Muda Berkarakter Pangan: Langkah Kolaboratif Panitia…, 2026-07-24) |
| Union provides social activities | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.2.1, 1 source (first: Dialog Aspirasi Mahasiswa FBS Unesa 2026: Membangun Budaya Partisipatif dan…, 2026-06-02) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation that PEMIRA's December 2025 university-wide vote (for BEM UNESA and MPM UNESA, not only the faculty-level races cited here) was completed and its results published Ask: Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
16.2.3Identify and engage with local stakeholders4 / 4worth 3.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 3.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on stakeholder engagement defining local stakeholders (residents, local businesses, local government) and how UNESA identifies and consults them, with issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. SOP for community partnership mapping, stating how units identify neighbouring communities and organisations and engage them through consultation or reporting channels, with approval date. 3. Surat Keputusan Rektor setting a stakeholder engagement procedure with clauses on identification and engagement, in force in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating the written policy's title, issue or review date (2022-2026), the clause defining local stakeholders and the clause on how UNESA engages them. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Written policy or procedure to identify local stakeholders | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.3.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 13 Tahun 2023 tentang Kerja…, 2023-06-27) |
| Written policy or procedure to engage with them | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.3.1, 2 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 13 Tahun 2023 tentang Kerja…, 2023-06-27) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation from the Rectorate or Direktorat Hukum that THE's narrower concept of 'local stakeholders external to the university' (people such as local businesses or residents who would not normally have a direct say in running the university) is intended to be met by UNESA's general cooperation (kerja sama) partner-identification and engagement procedure under Peraturan Rektor 13/2023 and Peraturan Senat Akademik 08/2023, since those regulations' partner categories are broader (they also cover national and international academic, government and business partners bound by formal MoU/MoA agreements) Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
16.2.4Participatory bodies for stakeholder engagement0 / 3worth 3.4 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Community advisory forum meeting each semester with village heads, residents and local government, feeding into campus planning, with dated minutes in 2025 or 2026. 2. Standing stakeholder consultation panel including local government and civil society groups, set up by Surat Keputusan Rektor, with its remit and meeting dates. 3. Public consultation mechanism for campus development, such as residents' hearings before building works, held on a regular schedule with attendees and outcomes. |
| Evidence | 1 | 0 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the standing participatory body, which residents, local government and civil society members join, what decisions it informs, how often it meets, and 2025 or 2026 dates. |
| Public | 1 | 0 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Existence of a participatory body or mechanism | Needs data | Request 1 below: A standing body, forum or mechanism, with a defined membership and terms of reference, through which local residents… |
What is still needed
- A standing body, forum or mechanism, with a defined membership and terms of reference, through which local residents, local government representatives or civil society representatives take part in UNESA's own decision making on a recurring basis, not a single benchmarking visit Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
- A dated 2025 or 2026 record (minutes, report or news item) showing that such a body met and that its input fed into a specific UNESA decision Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
16.2.5University principles on corruption and bribery3 / 3worth 3.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on gratification control and anti-corruption stating principles such as transparency, accountability and integrity, and commitments against bribery, published on the official site. 2. Public integrity pledge or anti-bribery statement signed by the Rector and leaders, with the commitments, date and the units covered. 3. Whistleblowing and conflict of interest rules published on unesa.ac.id, with the reporting channel, protections for reporters and the issue date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page stating UNESA's published principles and commitments against corruption, bribery and organised crime, with the regulation's title, issuer and date, readable without opening attachments. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Published principles and commitments on corruption and bribery | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.5.1, 3 sources (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 21 Tahun 2026 tentang…, 2026-05-08) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
16.2.6Academic freedom policy4 / 4worth 6.6 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 4; it is worth 6.6 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | 0.25 per area Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor on academic freedom stating lecturers may choose research topics and teach and speak publicly on their research, with its issue or review date (2022-2026). 2. Policy clause stating junior lecturers have the same research and teaching freedom as professors, with no need for a senior's approval, dated 2022-2026. 3. Senate or Rector regulation protecting freedom of the academic podium for teaching and research for all lecturer ranks, with its issue or review date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page quoting the academic freedom policy's title and date (2022-2026) and the clauses covering research and teaching freedom for both senior and junior academics. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
| Policy date | 1 | 1 | The policy was created or last reviewed in 2022-2026, and the date is shown |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Research freedom for senior academics | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.6.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang…, 2022-12-12) |
| Research freedom for junior academics | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.6.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang…, 2022-12-12) |
| Teaching freedom for senior academics | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.6.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang…, 2022-12-12) |
| Teaching freedom for junior academics | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.6.1, 1 source (first: Peraturan Rektor Universitas Negeri Surabaya Nomor 56 Tahun 2022 tentang…, 2022-12-12) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- PIC confirmation (Direktorat Hukum, Ketatalaksanaan dan Kepatuhan, or the University Academic Senate) that UNESA understands teaching freedom for junior, non-professorial academics to rest on the Academic Senate's Regulation Number 11 of 2023, Article 2(4) (the general freedom to discuss taught material and state academic opinions in teaching, open to every member of the academic community), separately from the narrower academic platform freedom (kebebasan mimbar akademik) that Article 3(3) of Rector's Regulation 56/2022 and Article 1(9) of the Senate's Regulation reserve for professors and lecturers with established scientific authority Ask: Direktorat Hukum (legal)
- 2025 or 2026 activity (a Senate decision, decree or news item) showing a named case of research or teaching freedom decided for a senior or junior academic under this policy or under SAU's authority (Government Regulation Number 37 of 2022, Article 27), to show the policy is applied and not only published Ask: Direktorat Akademik
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
16.2.7Publish financial data– / 3worth 3.2 of 100Quantitative
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.2 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Published financial data | Done | In the narration, section 16.2.7.1, 2 sources (first: Laporan Keuangan (audited), PPID Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 2026-09-26) |
Nothing open.
16.3 Working with government 23.2 points
16.3.1Provide expert advice to government3 / 3worth 6.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | 0.33 per tier: local, regional, national Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Local: a named UNESA professor sits on a Surabaya city government committee or gives policy guidance to a city agency, with the assignment, date and topic. 2. Regional: a UNESA expert advises the East Java provincial government on a policy or regulation draft, with the agency, advice given and date in 2025 or 2026. 3. National: a UNESA expert gives evidence or serves on a ministry or national committee, with the body, role and date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the UNESA expert and field, the government body advised, its level (local, regional or national), the advice given, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Local government | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.1.1, 1 source (first: Fakultas Hukum UNESA Jalin Kerja Sama dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten Nganjuk untuk…, 2026-07-21) |
| Regional government | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.1.1, 1 source (first: Fakultas Hukum UNESA Jalin Kerja Sama dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten Nganjuk untuk…, 2026-07-21) |
| National government | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.1.1, 1 source (first: Fakultas Hukum UNESA Jalin Kerja Sama dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten Nganjuk untuk…, 2026-07-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A public source naming a UNESA expert who gave specific policy guidance, sat on a committee, or gave evidence to a provincial (regional) government body in 2025 or 2026. The Faculty of Law holds a 2025 assignment letter (Surat Tugas Nomor 143898/UN38.12/KP.09.00/2025) for Tamsil and Indri Fogar Susilowati presenting an institutional-transformation study to the Government of Mahakam Ulu Regency, 15 to 18 October 2025, but that letter is internal, not publicly published, and Mahakam Ulu is a regency (local tier), not a province. Ask: Faculty of Law (FH)
- A public source naming a UNESA expert who gave specific policy guidance, committee participation, or evidence to national government in 2025 or 2026. The Faculty of Law holds a 2025 assignment letter (Surat Tugas Nomor 46952/UN38.12/KP.09.00/2025) for Dr. Pudji Astuti as expert witness for Kepolisian Resor Bontang, 21 April 2025, but that letter is internal, not publicly published. Two 20 August 2026 posts on S1 Ilmu Hukum Kampus 5's site name Dr. Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya as resource person for the Ministry of Forestry's law-enforcement briefing and for a national waste-management coordination meeting, but both posts resolve only to the programme's homepage, not to a specific article page, so neither can be cited. Ask: Faculty of Law (FH)
- Confirmation of any specific expert advice already delivered to DPRD Jawa Timur (the East Java provincial legislature) under the Faculty of Law's 15 December 2025 memorandum of understanding, since the MoU itself records only the intention to collaborate on legislative research and teaching. Ask: Faculty of Law (FH)
- Only one source is cited. A second, independent 2025 or 2026 source makes the claim harder to dispute.
16.3.2Policy- and lawmakers outreach and education3 / 3worth 6.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Training for local government officials or council members on public policy, law or climate change, run by a UNESA unit, with date, topic and participant numbers. 2. Capacity-building workshop for regional legislators or village officials on technology or economics, delivered by UNESA lecturers, with date, organiser and audience. 3. Briefing series for policymakers on migration, displacement or law by a UNESA legal aid unit, with sessions, dates and the government bodies attending. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the UNESA unit, the session topic (economics, law, technology, migration or climate), the external policy or law makers attending, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Outreach, education, upskilling or capacity-building for policy- and law-makers | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.2.1, 2 sources (first: Fakultas Hukum UNESA Jalin Kerja Sama dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten Nganjuk untuk…, 2026-07-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A dated 2025 or 2026 source showing UNESA delivering outreach, education or capacity-building specifically to national legislators, regulators or senior national policymakers, since the sources found so far reach only regency- and village-level government officials. Ask: Faculty of Law (FH)
- Confirmation from the SDG PIC that local government civil servants (ASN) and village officials, who administer local and village regulation, count as the 'policy- and law-makers' THE's indicator addresses; if THE intends only elected legislators or senior regulators, this indicator should instead be flagged. Ask: SDG PIC
- Confirmation of any specific training or education session already delivered to DPRD Jawa Timur members under the Faculty of Law's 15 December 2025 memorandum of understanding. Ask: Faculty of Law (FH)
16.3.3Participation in government research3 / 3worth 6.4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 6.4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint research between a UNESA researcher and a national research agency (BRIN) on an education or economic policy question, with agreement, topic and dates. 2. Policy study commissioned by a city or provincial planning agency (Bappeda or Balitbangda) and carried out by UNESA LPPM, with the policy question, outputs and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Research collaboration with a ministry on evaluating a programme and producing policy recommendations, with the department, UNESA team, topic and dates. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the UNESA researchers, the government department partner, the policy-focused research topic and how it informs policy, and the date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Policy-focused research with a government department | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.3.1, 5 sources (first: Mentan gandeng Unesa kembangkan benih kedelai guna tekan impor, 2026-07-28) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The soybean seed research's own results (germination, plot yields against the 3.5 to 6 tonnes per hectare targets, or the seed varieties produced), since the cited sources report the meeting and the memorandum of understanding but not yet a research output. Ask: Faculty of Food Security (FKP)
16.3.4Neutral platform to discuss issues3 / 3worth 4 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 4 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Public discussion forum hosted by UNESA with representatives of different political parties or institutions debating a policy issue, with open Q&A and a neutrality statement. 2. Dialogue with the Constitutional Court, legislators and civil society on a legal or electoral issue, hosted at UNESA, with speakers from different positions and date. 3. Regular campus policy debate series on public issues inviting speakers with differing political views, with dates, speakers and rules guaranteeing free questions. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the event or platform, the stakeholders with differing political views taking part, how UNESA kept it neutral with open Q&A, and the 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral platform for different political stakeholders | Done | In the narration, section 16.3.4.1, 3 sources (first: Unesa dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Jalin Kerja Sama Perkuat Pemahaman Hak…, 2025-08-29) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Confirmation from the SDG PIC that a platform convening civil society, academic, provincial-government and national-commission stakeholders around a policy issue satisfies 'different political stakeholders', or a stronger example showing people with visibly opposing political positions debating on UNESA's campus. Ask: SDG PIC
- Whether UNESA has a standing, named platform or terms of reference for hosting this kind of dialogue, rather than each session being organised separately by a different faculty or programme. Ask: Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)
16.4 Proportion of graduates in law and civil enforcement 23.2 points
16.4.1Proportion of graduates in lawworth 23.2 of 100Quantitative
Nothing open.
SDG 17 · Partnerships for the GoalsEvidence indicators: ~35.6 of 36.6 points secured · SDG reports 27.2 · quantitative 9.1 · THE-computed research 27.16 full points1 can be strengthened1 evidence missing17.1 Research into partnership for the goals 27.1 points · computed by THE from publications
17.2 Relationships to support the goals 18.5 points
17.2.1Relationships with regional NGOs and government for SDG policy3 / 3worth 3.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the input in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. UNESA researchers draft part of a regional SDG action plan for East Java with the provincial planning agency (Bappeda), with the contribution, dates and units named. 2. UNESA experts sit on a regional SDGs secretariat or working group that identifies problems and monitors progress, with assignment, body and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. UNESA team produces an evaluation or data analysis of SDG indicators for a city government, used in its monitoring report, with agency, output and date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the government body or regional NGO, what UNESA contributed to its SDG policy (study, draft, data, expert seat), the UNESA unit and experts, and the date. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Identifying problems and challenges | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.1.1, 2 sources (first: Kemensos RI Kolaborasi dengan Unesa dan PTN-PTS se-Jatim Atasi Kemiskinan…, 2025-02-10) |
| Developing policies and strategies | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.1.1, 2 sources (first: Kemensos RI Kolaborasi dengan Unesa dan PTN-PTS se-Jatim Atasi Kemiskinan…, 2025-02-10) |
| Modelling likely futures with and without interventions | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
| Monitoring and reporting on interventions | Needs data | Request 2 below: Any 2025 or 2026 UNESA role in a national or provincial SDG body or plan (for example the East Java SDGs regional… |
| Enabling adaptive management | Needs data | No 2025-2026 source found yet |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A partner-side document naming UNESA's contribution: the final Mahakam Ulu Regional Innovation System roadmap or the regent's decree adopting it, and any 2025 or 2026 study UNESA delivered under the Ministry of Social Affairs poverty cooperation. Ask: Sekolah Pascasarjana (graduate school)
- Any 2025 or 2026 UNESA role in a national or provincial SDG body or plan (for example the East Java SDGs regional action plan, RAD TPB, or Bappenas' SDGs secretariat): appointment letter, study or report. Ask: SDGs Center
17.2.2Cross sectoral dialogue about SDGs3 / 3worth 3.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the dialogue in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. UNESA organises an SDG conference or forum in 2025 or 2026 with government agencies, NGOs and business speakers, with date, organiser, sectors present and SDGs discussed. 2. UNESA lecturers speak at an SDG dialogue organised by a ministry, NGO or regional government, with event name, date, sectors present and topic. 3. Multi-stakeholder roundtable on an SDG issue such as waste or poverty with local government, NGOs and industry, hosted or joined by UNESA, with outcomes. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the SDG event, the date, whether UNESA organised or joined it, the sectors present (government, NGOs, industry) and the SDGs discussed. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Dialogue initiated by UNESA (UNESA organised or hosted it) | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.2.1, 3 sources (first: Kemensos RI Kolaborasi dengan Unesa dan PTN-PTS se-Jatim Atasi Kemiskinan…, 2025-02-10) |
| Dialogue UNESA took part in (organised by others) | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.2.2, 1 source (first: Peringatan Hari Disabilitas Internasional (HDI) 2025 di Jawa Timur: Wujud…, 2025-12-09) |
| The sectors involved (government, NGOs, industry, communities) and the SDG issues addressed | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.2.3, 3 sources (first: Kemensos RI Kolaborasi dengan Unesa dan PTN-PTS se-Jatim Atasi Kemiskinan…, 2025-02-10) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026 SDG dialogue that UNESA organised with an NGO as a participant or co-organiser (for example an SDGs Center forum with NGOs), with date, participants and outcome. Ask: SDGs Center
17.2.3International collaboration data gathering for SDG3 / 3worth 3.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the participation in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Joint cross-country survey with foreign university partners collecting SDG indicator data, such as student sustainability attitudes, with partners, countries, dates and UNESA's role. 2. UNESA submits campus sustainability data to an international ranking or network (such as UI GreenMetric or SDSN) in 2025 or 2026, with the data type and date. 3. International research consortium measuring SDG progress in several countries, with UNESA collecting local data, naming partners, dataset and period. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the international partners or network, what SDG data was gathered or measured, UNESA's role and contribution, and the dates in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| International collaboration on gathering or measuring SDG data (the network or partner, and what data) | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.3.1, 3 sources (first: UNESA Percepat Pemenuhan Indikator UI Green Metric melalui Penguatan Kampus…, 2026-03-04) |
| UNESA's role and contribution (the unit, the data supplied or measured, the dates) | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.3.2, 1 source (first: S1 Pendidikan Tata Boga UNESA Perkuat Jejaring Internasional dan Komitmen SDGs…, 2026-08-13) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- A 2025 or 2026 joint project with foreign partners that gathers or measures SDG data (for example a cross-country survey, shared indicators, or membership of SDSN or the UNU-IAS SDG University Platform), with partners, data and dates. The current evidence is UNESA's own data submissions to international rankings and a conference. Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
17.2.4Collaboration for SDG best practice3 / 3worth 3.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the review in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. International SDG symposium with foreign universities where papers compare national approaches to an SDG and outputs are published, with date, partners and countries. 2. Participation in an international university SDG platform (such as UNU-IAS) to review actions and share best practice, with UNESA's contribution and dates. 3. Joint research with a foreign university comparing policy approaches to an SDG, producing a guideline or paper, with partners, topic and 2025 or 2026 date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the foreign partners and countries, the SDG topic compared, the best practice output (paper, guideline, symposium outcome), and the date in 2025 or 2026. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| International collaboration reviewing comparative approaches to the SDGs | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.4.1, 3 sources (first: Dosen Pendidikan IPA Unesa Gandeng University of the Philippines Visayas Teliti…, 2026-01-20) |
| Best practice developed and shared (the output: a paper, guideline, model, symposium outcome) | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.4.2, 3 sources (first: Dosen Unesa Berpartisipasi dalam Forum Internasional SDGs di Hamburg Jerman, 2025-12-06) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Published outputs of the collaborations: the HAW Hamburg symposium proceedings or papers, the UNESA and UP Visayas comparative study's results, and the ICSSF 2026 proceedings with the list of foreign participants. Ask: Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)
17.2.5Collaboration with NGOs for SDGs3 / 3worth 3.7 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 3.7 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | 0.33 per option Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Student volunteering: UNESA students volunteer with a named non-profit group on an SDG project such as literacy or waste, with NGO, dates and number of volunteers. 2. Research programme: UNESA researchers work with an NGO on an SDG study, such as child nutrition or women's empowerment, with partner, topic and 2025 or 2026 dates. 3. Educational resources: UNESA and an NGO jointly develop a learning module or handbook on an SDG topic, with NGO name, resource title and release date. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the non-profit NGO and why it is an NGO, the programme (volunteering, research or learning resources), the SDG addressed, the date and participants or outputs. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Student volunteering programmes with NGOs | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.5.1, 5 sources (first: Aksi Nyata Bersama Masyarakat, Program LCAS Labschool Unesa Libatkan Volunteer…, 2025-11-24) |
| Research programmes with NGOs | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.5.1, 5 sources (first: Aksi Nyata Bersama Masyarakat, Program LCAS Labschool Unesa Libatkan Volunteer…, 2025-11-24) |
| Development of educational resources with NGOs | Done | In the narration, section 17.2.5.2, 2 sources (first: Prodi Teknologi Pendidikan UNESA Implementasikan Meta-VPNL untuk Mendukung SDG…, 2025-06-21) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- Research programmes with NGOs: a 2025 or 2026 research project run with a named NGO (for example the Sociology programme's 2025 project with BRIN, IPB University and an NGO), with the NGO's name, title, SDG and dates. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Numbers of UNESA university students in the LCAS programme and in the other volunteering programmes. Ask: Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool
17.3 Publication of SDG reports 27.2 points
17.3.1Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.2Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.3Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.4Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.5Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.6Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.7Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.8Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.9Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.10Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.11Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.12Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.13Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.14Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.15Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.16Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.3.17Publication of SDG reports - per SDG– / 3worth 1.6 of 100SDG report
How the points are scored
per SDG, existence 1 + evidence 1 + public 1.
Nothing open.
17.4 Education for the SDGs 27.2 points
17.4.1Education for SDGs commitment to meaningful education3 / 3worth 9.1 of 100Full points
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 9.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Education integrated across the full curriculum 1, mandatory education for all 0.66, optional education for all 0.25 Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Peraturan Rektor or curriculum guideline requiring SDG and sustainability content in every study programme, integrated across courses, with issue date and the clause stating it. 2. Compulsory university course on sustainability and the SDGs that every undergraduate student takes, such as a thematic community service course, with credits, year and students covered. 3. Curriculum framework with SDG learning outcomes mapped into all programmes across faculties, showing the number of programmes covered and the 2025 or 2026 academic year. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page showing the university-wide commitment (clause and date) and how SDG education reaches all students, such as the course taken by all and the programmes covered. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Education integrated across the full curriculum | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.1.1, 5 sources (first: Pedoman Pengembangan, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi Kurikulum UNESA Edisi III, 2025) |
| Mandatory education for all students | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.1.2, 2 sources (first: Pedoman Pengembangan, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi Kurikulum UNESA Edisi III, 2025) |
| Optional education for all students | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.1.2, 2 sources (first: Pedoman Pengembangan, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi Kurikulum UNESA Edisi III, 2025) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- The Rector's Regulation number and date that enact the 2025 curriculum guideline (the published PDF shows 'Peraturan Rektor' on its cover but no number; JDIH requires a login). Ask: Direktorat Pendidikan dan Transformasi Pembelajaran
- How many study programmes' 2025 or 2026 course plans list the SDGs supported (a count or share), to show the integration reaches all programmes. Ask: Direktorat Pendidikan dan Transformasi Pembelajaran
- The policy has no review date. THE looks at when a policy was set and last reviewed: ask the issuing unit for the last review date.
17.4.2Education for SDGs specific courses on sustainability– / 3worth 9.1 of 100Quantitative
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 9.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 1 | Show the policy or activity in place, with a 2025 or 2026 date |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Full degrees addressing sustainability and the SDGs | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.2.1, 2 sources (first: S1 Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota: Visi, Misi, dan Tujuan, 2026-09-24) |
| Electives addressing sustainability and the SDGs | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.2.1, 2 sources (first: S1 Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota: Visi, Misi, dan Tujuan, 2026-09-24) |
Optional, would make the evidence harder to dispute
- D3, D4 dated before 2025: THE counts 2025 or 2026 activity, so add a 2025-2026 source for the same point.
17.4.3Education for SDGs in the wider community2.66 / 3worth 9.1 of 100Can be strengthened
How the points are scored
THE scores this indicator out of 3; it is worth 9.1 of the SDG’s 100 points.
| Points for | Full | Now | What earns the full point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Existence | 1 | 0.66 | Alumni 0.33, local community 0.33, displaced people and refugees 0.33. To raise it, see the Needs data criteria below Examples that would answer THE's question: 1. Alumni: webinar or training series on sustainability and SDGs for UNESA alumni, with organiser, date, topic and number of alumni attending. 2. Local community: SDG education workshop for residents or schools, such as waste sorting training for villagers, with date, organiser, audience and participants. 3. Displaced people and refugees: sustainability or SDG learning session for displaced people or refugees, with partner organisation, date, content and participant numbers. |
| Evidence | 1 | 1 | Evidence that answers THE's exact question scores 1; general evidence scores 0.5 Example of specific evidence: One public page naming the educational activity, its audience (alumni, local community or displaced people), the SDG or sustainability content taught, the organiser, date in 2025 or 2026 and participants. |
| Public | 1 | 1 | On a page anyone can open; an uploaded attachment counts as not public |
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| Alumni | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.3.2, 1 source (first: Alumni S2 PAUD UNESA Tutup Webinar Series: Inovasi PAUD Harus Nyambung dengan…, 2026-09-02) |
| Local community | Done | In the narration, section 17.4.3.1, 5 sources (first: Dosen UNESA dan UNISLA Kembangkan Ecopreneurship Melalui Kolam Ikan dan…, 2025-11-05) |
| Displaced people and refugees | Needs data | Request 1 below: Displaced people and refugees: an educational activity on sustainability or the SDGs for displaced people or refugees… |
What is still needed
- Displaced people and refugees: an educational activity on sustainability or the SDGs for displaced people or refugees in 2025 or 2026 (for example with disaster survivors in temporary shelters, or with UNHCR or IOM), with date and participant numbers. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
- Alumni: an SDG or sustainability course, training or webinar run by UNESA for its alumni in 2025 or 2026, with participant numbers (the current evidence is an alumni association's webinar on early childhood education). Ask: Alumni office
- Participant numbers for the community trainings in Rejotengah, Sukoruo and Menanggal. Ask: LPPM (research and community service)
17.4.4Sustainable Literacyworth 0 of 100Evidence missing
How the points are scored
none; THE does not score it this cycle and uses it to inform later decisions.
Criteria THE lists
| Criterion | Status | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|
| How UNESA measures students' sustainability literacy (the test or instrument, who takes it, when) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Any 2025 or 2026 measurement of students' sustainability literacy (Sulitest TASK or another test or survey): the… |
| Results (number of students tested, scores) | Needs data | Request 1 below: Any 2025 or 2026 measurement of students' sustainability literacy (Sulitest TASK or another test or survey): the… |
What is still needed
- Any 2025 or 2026 measurement of students' sustainability literacy (Sulitest TASK or another test or survey): the instrument, who took it, when, and the results (number tested, scores). Ask: SDGs Center
Direktorat SDM (human resources)9 items
- SDG 8.2.2Employment practice unionsWhether UNESA recognises a staff union, employee association, or KORPRI unit with a freedom-of-association or collective-bargaining function (representation, negotiation, or welfare advocacy on employees' behalf), and, if so, its founding or recognition decree and date.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.2Employment practice unionsWhether that body's own rules state that women and international or foreign staff are eligible members, with the text of that provision.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.2Employment practice unionsWhether UNESA adopts, in its own rules, the right of lecturers to join professional organisations that Law 14/2005 on Teachers and Lecturers gives them (Article 51(1)g), and extends it to education staff.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.5Employment practice equivalent rights outsourcingWhether any UNESA regulation issued or reviewed since 2022 covers third-party outsourced workers (rather than UNESA's own directly hired Tenaga Kontrak under Peraturan Rektor 124/2017, which has no review date).Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.6Employment policy pay scale equityA written commitment, in a regulation, decree, or SDM policy, to measure and/or eliminate a gender pay gap at UNESA, or a gender-disaggregated pay-scale comparison that shows one has been done.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.7Tracking pay scale for gender equityEvidence that UNESA has ever measured or tracked pay by gender: the method used (for example by rank, allowance, or total remuneration), who ran it, how often, and any findings.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.9Employment practice labour rightsFormal recognition of an employee body, such as a union, association, or bipartite forum, that performs collective bargaining or represents staff in negotiation with the university, together with its rules on whether women and international staff are members or eligible.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.4.4Affordable housing for employeesA dated 2025 or 2026 source confirming the current status of the UNESA, Bank BTN and PT Oma Estate housing collaboration for lecturers and staff (eligibility, and whether it evaluates affordability, provides housing directly, or gives financial support), since the UNESA press page announcing it could not be read.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.4.4Affordable housing for employeesAny affordability benchmark UNESA has used to evaluate employee housing (for example against a median-household-income standard).Evidence missing
Facilities and assets (Sarana Prasarana, Aset)9 items
- SDG 8.2.5Employment practice equivalent rights outsourcingWhether UNESA's service contracts with outsourcing vendors (cleaning, security/satpam, catering) include a clause guaranteeing workers' rights (pay, safety, working hours or similar protections) equivalent to directly employed staff, and the contract's number and date.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.5Employment practice equivalent rights outsourcingA headcount of outsourced staff by role (cleaning, security, catering), if UNESA wants to state the scale covered.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.4.4Affordable housing for employeesThe delivery status and date of the planned guest house for Campus 5 (Magetan) lecturers in the former District Building, named in last year's file with no date.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.4.6Pedestrian priority on campusWhether the redesigned Ketintang campus main gate (completed 12 December 2025) includes a vehicle separated pedestrian path, a restricted vehicle zone, or pedestrian priority signage, with a description or photograph of the built designEvidence missing
- SDG 11.4.6Pedestrian priority on campusAny campus master plan, traffic management rule or standing practice that gives pedestrians priority over vehicles on campus roads and paths, with its dateEvidence missing
- SDG 11.4.8Planning development - new build standardsThe name of any sustainable building standard, code (for example Bangunan Gedung Hijau) or certification UNESA requires or follows for new construction, and which building(s) it has been applied to by 2025, with datesEvidence missing
- SDG 11.4.8Planning development - new build standardsWhether the RSPTN teaching hospital design (with BAPPENAS and AIIB appointed consultants) incorporates a named sustainability standard, given AIIB's own environmental and social safeguard requirements for financed projectsEvidence missing
- SDG 11.4.9Building on brownfield sitesWhether the Sekolah Rakyat site at Gedangan, Sidoarjo, or any other 2025 or planned UNESA building project, sits on land that was previously built on or developed (a former building, factory, or other developed use), with that prior use namedEvidence missing
- SDG 11.4.9Building on brownfield sitesAny UNESA policy or practice stating a preference to build on brownfield sites where possibleEvidence missing
LPPM (research and community service)9 items
- SDG 1.4.2Local start-up financial assistanceAny 2025 or 2026 disbursement list of UNESA's own grants, seed funding, equipment grants with value, or revolving funds to local-community (non-student) start-ups, including any UNESA funding that directs how a partner's charitable funds (such as YBM PLN's) are allocated to specific community businessesEvidence missing
- SDG 1.4.2Local start-up financial assistanceThe value of the DPPM Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2026 grant behind the auto egg steamer for UKM Telur Asin Krembangan, and confirmation the equipment was delivered to the businessEvidence missing
- SDG 1.4.2Local start-up financial assistanceWhether UNESA's Business and Technology Incubator (Inkubator Bisnis dan Teknologi, IBT) or any faculty runs a seed-funding, matched-funding or revolving-fund scheme for local-community start-ups (as distinct from student PMW/P2MW funding), and any 2025/2026 disbursementsEvidence missing
- SDG 1.4.4Policy addressing povertyA formal role for UNESA with Surabaya city's Bappeda or its poverty reduction coordination team (TKPK), such as membership, a study, or input into city level poverty planningCan be strengthened
- SDG 1.4.4Policy addressing povertyA formal role for UNESA with East Java province's Bappeda specifically on the province's own RPJMD poverty reduction targets, distinct from the Kemensos ministry level MoUCan be strengthened
- SDG 1.4.4Policy addressing povertyUNESA's own Sekolah Rakyat's enrollment figure, separate from East Java's 26 school, 2,489 student provincial totalCan be strengthened
- SDG 1.4.4Policy addressing povertyAny research, problem mapping report or policy recommendation document that the Kampung Anti Miskin MoU has produced since it was signedCan be strengthened
- SDG 17.4.3Education for SDGs in the wider communityDisplaced people and refugees: an educational activity on sustainability or the SDGs for displaced people or refugees in 2025 or 2026 (for example with disaster survivors in temporary shelters, or with UNHCR or IOM), with date and participant numbers.Can be strengthened
- SDG 17.4.3Education for SDGs in the wider communityParticipant numbers for the community trainings in Rejotengah, Sukoruo and Menanggal.Can be strengthened
Rectorate (with Renbang, Humas, PPID)7 items
- SDG 4.3.2Public events (lifelong learning)An institution-wide record or dashboard of every public event UNESA hosts each year and its attendance, to confirm the full 2025 and 2026 count and the exact share of free versus charged events beyond the examples found in published articles.Can be strengthened
- SDG 5.3.2Policy for women applications and entryAny UNESA policy dated 2022-2026 (for example a gender mainstreaming plan, an access and participation plan, or an internal circular) that specifically addresses women's applications, acceptance, entry or participation; the two admissions regulations checked so far (Perrek 14/2024 and Peraturan Senat Akademik 6/2025) contain no clause naming women, sex or genderEvidence missing
- SDG 13.3.2Climate Action Plan, sharedA 2025 or 2026 record that the Climate Action Plan (or an updated version) was formally shared with a named local government body (for example the Surabaya city government or a provincial/district Dinas Lingkungan Hidup) or a local community group, such as a handover event, letter, or joint publication.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.3.2Climate Action Plan, sharedPublic copies of the other plan component documents named in last year's file (Circular of Sustainable Procurement, Sustainable Investment Circular, GHG Emission Reduction Program, Emission Reduction to 2050, SK SDGs 2022), if they still exist, to strengthen the existence evidence.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.3.3Co-operative planning for climate change disastersConfirmation of whether the Regional Java Forum for Rector Collaboration on Environmental Protection and Management (28 July 2025, with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry) counts as regional co-operative planning for climate change disasters, or a clearer regional-level source naming climate-change disaster planning specifically (a joint contingency plan or working group on flood, drought or displacement risk).Evidence missing
- SDG 16.2.4Participatory bodies for stakeholder engagementA standing body, forum or mechanism, with a defined membership and terms of reference, through which local residents, local government representatives or civil society representatives take part in UNESA's own decision making on a recurring basis, not a single benchmarking visitEvidence missing
- SDG 16.2.4Participatory bodies for stakeholder engagementA dated 2025 or 2026 record (minutes, report or news item) showing that such a body met and that its input fed into a specific UNESA decisionEvidence missing
Direktorat Hukum (legal)6 items
- SDG 4.3.5Lifelong learning access policyThe rector regulation or decree, with its number and date (2022-2026), that states access to UNESA's public lifelong-learning activities (free courses, public events, vocational training, off-campus outreach) is open regardless of ethnicity, religion, disability, immigration status and gender, for participants who are not enrolled UNESA students.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.2Employment practice unionsPeraturan Rektor Number 42 of 2026 on the appointment and dismissal of foreign lecturers and staff (listed on JDIH, 3 August 2026, in force; title only, not yet read): whether it gives foreign staff the same rights as other staff, including joining staff bodies.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.4Employment policy modern slaveryWhether UNESA has any policy, code of ethics, or procurement/supplier rule that names forced labour, modern slavery, human trafficking or child labour, in its own employment practice or in contracts with outsourced service providers, with its number and date.Evidence missing
- SDG 8.2.9Employment practice labour rightsPeraturan Rektor Number 42 of 2026 on the appointment and dismissal of foreign lecturers and staff (listed on JDIH, 3 August 2026, in force; title only, not yet read): whether it gives foreign staff the same rights as other staff, including joining staff bodies.Evidence missing
- SDG 16.2.1Elected representationThe Peraturan Rektor on the procedure for choosing MWA members (referred to by the Statuta but not yet located), or a 2025-2026 dated record showing whether the student, non-SAU lecturer and education-staff MWA seats were filled by an election within each group before SAU nominated them, or by SAU/ministerial appointment aloneEvidence missing
- SDG 16.2.1Elected representationWhether the University Academic Senate (SAU), rather than the MWA, is the body THE should treat as UNESA's 'highest governing body' for this indicator, given that SAU's own faculty lecturer seats are Statuta-elected but SAU has no student or non-faculty staff seatEvidence missing
Direktorat Smart Eco-Campus (USSC)6 items
- SDG 11.4.1Sustainable practices targetsA dated, actual target for sustainable commuting (a numeric mode-share, vehicle-to-population ratio ceiling, or electric-fleet share, with the date the target was set), not only a measurement or a planning-meeting report. Last year's file states a vehicle-to-population ratio of 0.057 and a zero-emission fleet of 332 units, but gives no date the count was taken and no stated target, and its two population bases (66,113 and 78,146) disagree and are unresolved.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.2.1Low-carbon energy trackingA 2025 or 2026 whole-university measurement of low-carbon energy used (a kWh or GJ figure, broken down by source), from a dashboard, meter programme or energy audit.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.2.1Low-carbon energy trackingIf no whole-university figure exists, a partial measurement naming which campus, building or system is metered, with its 2025 or 2026 kWh/GJ figure for low-carbon energy.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.3.3Co-operative planning for climate change disastersA local-level co-operative planning activity with a city or district government disaster agency (for example BPBD Surabaya) on climate-change disaster planning, contingency planning, or early warning, with a public 2025 or 2026 source and date.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.4.1Commitment to carbon neutral universityA dated UNESA document or public statement giving a target year for carbon neutrality, covering at least Greenhouse Gas Protocol Scope 1 and Scope 2, with what falls under each scope claimed (for example Scope 1: campus vehicles and generators; Scope 2: purchased electricity; Scope 3: commuting, procurement, waste, water).Evidence missing
- SDG 13.4.1Commitment to carbon neutral universityWhether any carbon-neutrality claim would rely on carbon credits, and if so whether they are high-integrity, permanent-removal credits or lower-integrity avoidance credits, per THE's guidance.Evidence missing
Direktorat Akademik4 items
- SDG 1.3.2Bottom financial quintile student successA stated completion, graduation or dropout-ceiling target specifically for KIP-Kuliah or other bottom-quintile/low income students (for example a minimum GPA or maximum time-to-degree condition attached to keeping a KIP-K scholarship, or a target retention/completion rate the university sets for this group), dated 2025 or 2026.Evidence missing
- SDG 5.3.4Women’s application in underrepresented subjectsThe women's share in the underrepresented programmes (for example Mechanical, Civil, Electrical Engineering), 2025 intakeEvidence missing
- SDG 5.6.7Track women’s graduation rateGraduation (completion) rates of women and men for the cohort graduating in 2025, ideally 2021-2025Evidence missing
- SDG 5.6.7Track women’s graduation rateThe scheme in place to close any gap, with its 2025 or 2026 activity (or a statement that no gap exists and monitoring continues)Evidence missing
Direktorat Kemahasiswaan (student affairs)4 items
- SDG 1.3.2Bottom financial quintile student successWhether any unit (Direktorat Kemahasiswaan, the KIP-K student forum Formadiksi, or a faculty) tracks and reports completion or dropout outcomes specifically for KIP-K or low income students, with 2025/2026 figures.Evidence missing
- SDG 1.3.3Low-income student supportFree basic needs support for low income students (food, housing, transportation or legal services, or a dedicated support centre) that is either fee waived or eligibility limited to low income students, distinct from the university's general free exam breakfasts and Ramadan iftar which are open to all students and the public.Can be strengthened
- SDG 5.3.3Women’s access schemesA 2025 or 2026 mentoring scheme aimed at women students (name, organiser, dates, participants)Evidence missing
- SDG 5.6.6Women’s mentoring schemesA women's mentoring scheme in 2025 or 2026 with its number of female participants and the total number of female students, showing at least 10% take partEvidence missing
DIPD (digital learning)3 items
- SDG 4.3.1Public resources (lifelong learning)Participant numbers for the free public webinars run by S3 Ilmu Pendidikan (May 2026) and S2 Kimia (January 2026), and any other free certificated courses for the public in 2025.Can be strengthened
- SDG 4.3.1Public resources (lifelong learning)A dated 2025 or 2026 course-run or enrolment announcement for Grownesa, and confirmation that registration is open to people who are not UNESA students or staff.Can be strengthened
- SDG 4.3.1Public resources (lifelong learning)Confirmation from DIPD that people outside UNESA can and do enrol in Grownesa's free courses (for example a count of non-UNESA learners).Can be strengthened
Admissions (PMB / Subdirektorat Admisi)2 items
- SDG 5.3.1Tracking access measures2025 intake figures split by gender: applicants, admitted and enrolled women and men per route (SNBP, SNBT, Mandiri), with the computed application and acceptance ratesEvidence missing
- SDG 5.3.1Tracking access measuresHow the tracking works: the system that records applicant gender (SIAKAD / admissions system), the unit that reviews the figures and how oftenEvidence missing
Direktorat IPPI (innovation, rankings)2 items
- SDG 11.4.1Sustainable practices targetsConfirmation of whether the shuttle-car procurement, campus-bicycle count, and electric golf-car plan discussed at the 4 March 2026 coordination meeting were adopted as a formal, dated target, or remain a discussion item.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.2.1Low-carbon energy trackingThe result of the UI GreenMetric 2026 carbon-data and smart-building monitoring work flagged as in progress in the 4 March and 21 May 2026 coordination meetings: whether a measured low-carbon energy figure was produced by the submission deadline.Evidence missing
Direktorat Keuangan (finance)2 items
- SDG 1.3.3Low-income student supportThe number of students who used the UKT level reduction or instalment plan in 2025 and 2026.Can be strengthened
- SDG 10.6.10Disability accommodation policyA named reasonable-accommodation policy or strategy for people with disabilities that states a funding commitment or budget line (existing sources describe accommodations in the 2 October 2025 Buku Saku UNESA Inklusif guide, and name PSLPD/PUID and the Disability Innovation Center as responsible units, but no source states a funding amount or budget allocation for accommodations)Evidence missing
Faculty of Education (FIP) and Labschool2 items
- SDG 5.6.4Childcare facilities for studentsWhether students pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free access 1, paid 0.25)Evidence missing
- SDG 5.6.5Childcare facilities for staff and facultyWhether staff and lecturers pay to use TPA Labschool UNESA 1 and Sunshine Daycare UNESA, and the fee if they do (THE scores free access 1, paid 0.25)Evidence missing
Faculty of Engineering (FT)2 items
- SDG 5.3.4Women’s application in underrepresented subjects2025 or 2026 outreach aimed at encouraging women to apply to subjects where they are underrepresented (for example the Women in Engineering and Innovation programme named in last year's file): name, date, target, reach, subjectsEvidence missing
- SDG 5.3.4Women’s application in underrepresented subjectsA 2025 or 2026 regional or national campaign run with a named partner (government, NGO, schools or universities) for the same purposeEvidence missing
Faculty of Languages and Arts (FBS)2 items
- SDG 11.2.3Public access to museumsWhether entry to Galeri Wastu Wimba, UNESA's new fine-art gallery at Building T3, Faculty of Languages and Arts (opened 18 September 2025 with the 'MACAK' exhibition), is free or ticketed, and its standing public opening hours beyond the opening-day exhibition.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.2.3Public access to museumsAn inventory of any UNESA-operated museum, gallery, or permanent exhibition space, and whether admission to any of them is charged.Evidence missing
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (FISIPOL)2 items
- SDG 11.2.3Public access to museumsWhether entry to the 'Surabaya City of Heroes' history exhibition (23-24 September 2025, Gedung I6 Srikandi, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences), which the Faculty's own report states was 'open to the public', was free or ticketed.Evidence missing
- SDG 11.2.3Public access to museumsWhether the 'History House Laboratory' (Building I7, FISIP), described on the lab's Instagram as open to everyone, held any dated activity in 2025 or 2026, and its access terms (free/paid, hours).Evidence missing
Faculty of Vocational Studies2 items
- SDG 13.3.1Local education programmes on climateConfirmation that a 2025 or 2026 climate-change education programme or campaign (on risks, impacts, mitigation, adaptation, impact reduction or early warning) was actually delivered to a local audience such as a school or community group, not only designed as a student course project.Evidence missing
- SDG 13.3.1Local education programmes on climateWhether BPBD Surabaya or any school adopted the 2026 student-designed flood-education media (the picture book, playmat, or animations), with the date(s) and audience reached.Evidence missing
PUID (Disability Innovation Center)2 items
- SDG 4.3.5Lifelong learning access policyAny written access or non-discrimination statement published by PUI-PID (Disability Innovation Center), Grownesa or LP3 for participants who are not UNESA students or staff.Evidence missing
- SDG 10.6.10Disability accommodation policyConfirmation that Buku Saku UNESA Inklusif (dated Surabaya, 2 October 2025) is published at a public URL rather than only distributed as a PDF, since an uploaded document alone scores as not publicEvidence missing
SDGs Center2 items
- SDG 13.3.1Local education programmes on climateA university-wide or centrally-run local education programme or campaign on a climate-change topic, with its dates, organiser and participant or audience numbers.Evidence missing
- SDG 17.4.4Sustainable LiteracyAny 2025 or 2026 measurement of students' sustainability literacy (Sulitest TASK or another test or survey): the instrument, who took it, when, and the results (number tested, scores).Evidence missing
Alumni office1 item
- SDG 17.4.3Education for SDGs in the wider communityAlumni: an SDG or sustainability course, training or webinar run by UNESA for its alumni in 2025 or 2026, with participant numbers (the current evidence is an alumni association's webinar on early childhood education).Can be strengthened
Direktorat PPIS and Satgas PPKPT1 item
- SDG 4.3.5Lifelong learning access policyConfirmation of whether Rector's Regulation No. 11 of 2024's non-discrimination clause (Pasal 11 ayat (1)) has been applied, or was intended to apply, to members of the public taking part in UNESA's webinars, open houses, training or outreach, and not only to the academic community defined in Pasal 1 angka 10.Evidence missing
Direktorat Pendidikan dan Transformasi Pembelajaran1 item
- SDG 4.3.5Lifelong learning access policyWhether any non-discrimination clause exists for UNESA's public-facing services (Grownesa, LP3 short courses, public events). The Jalur Disabilitas admission track rests on Rector's Regulation Number 14 of 2024, Article 7(1)(e) and 7(6), which covers degree admissions only.Evidence missing
International Office (Kantor Urusan Internasional)1 item
- SDG 1.4.4Policy addressing povertyAny UNESA role in a global or multilateral poverty policy framework or processCan be strengthened
Scholarship unit1 item
- SDG 5.3.3Women’s access schemesA 2025 or 2026 scholarship reserved for or prioritising women (name, funder, eligibility, recipients)Evidence missing
Student housing (Rusunawa)1 item
- SDG 5.3.3Women’s access schemesAny other 2025 or 2026 provision for women's access, with a dated public source (for example the women-only Rusunawa buildings A-C at Lidah Wetan, with 2025 occupancy)Evidence missing
UPT Perpustakaan (library)1 item
- SDG 4.3.1Public resources (lifelong learning)Any campus facility or equipment (library, laboratory, sports or study space) that people who are not UNESA students can use free of charge on a standing basis in 2025 or 2026, with the access rule.Can be strengthened
Estimates as of 21 October 2026, built from the goal-progress files. Points are each indicator's share of its SDG score; "Ask" names the unit that holds the missing evidence. Greyed goals are not in UNESA's 2027 submission.
